image/svg+xml29XIII/1/2022INTERDISCIPLINARIA ARCHAEOLOGICANATURAL SCIENCES IN ARCHAEOLOGYhomepage: http://www.iansa.euThe Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case StudyGeorge Malaperdas1*, Christoflis Maggidis2, Ef Karantzali3, Nikolaos Zacharias11Laboratory of Archaeometry, University of Peloponnese, Old Campus, 241 33 Kalamata, Greece2Mycenaean Foundation, Mycenae Lower Town Excavation, 212 00 Mycenae, Greece3Ephorate of Antiquities of Phthiotida and Eurytania, Castle of Lamia, 351 00, Lamia, Greece1. IntroductionA new fve-year feld project commenced in 2018 under the directorship and auspices of the local Ephorate of Antiquities with the collaboration of Dickinson College, the Geophysics Laboratory of the Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, the Architectural Design and Research Laboratory of the Democritus University of Thrace, the Archaeometry Laboratory of the University of the Peloponnese, and the support of the Mycenaean Foundation, the Municipality of Lamia, and the Prefecture of Central Greece. The Mycenaean Spercheios-valley Archaeological (MY.SPE.AR.) project combines extensive and intensive archaeological survey work, aerial reconnaissance, a geophysical survey, targeted excavation, and digital technology in order to locate, identify, and map all Mycenaean sites in the region of the Spercheios valley.The study area is located in Central Greece and, more specifcally, in the wider area of the Spercheios river valley in the Prefecture of Fthiotida (Figure 1). The Spercheios valley, wedged in-between Thessaly and Boeotia, divides the regions of central and southern Greece allowing only for a narrow shoreline passageway between them. The valley is nearly land-locked, surrounded on three sides by mountain ranges (Mt. Othris, Mt. Oiti, Mt. Timphristos) that delineate clear regional boundaries, while allowing, however, eastward access to the sea (Maliakos Gulf). The Spercheios river fows from the west to the east for some 85 km, meandering toward Volume XIII ● Issue 1/2022 ● Pages 29–39*Corresponding author. E-mail: envcart@yahoo.grARTICLE INFOArticle history:Received: 22ndMarch 2021Accepted: 1stFebruary 2022DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24916/iansa.2022.1.3Key words:MTCpredictive modelGISancient topographyland surveyingSpercheiosABSTRACTThe initial goal of the Mycenaean Spercheios-Valley Archaeological Project (MY.SPE.AR.) is to undertake a systematic archaeogeophysical survey of the Spercheios Valley in central Greece. The extensive and intensive survey focuses on locating, documenting, mapping and analysing environmental features in correlation with the archaeological remains of Mycenaean sites in the region. This documentation and analysis have already commenced and will be further implemented with use of technologies such as Mobile GPS, UAV photography, satellite imagery analysis, remote sensing, spatial analysis with GIS, test pits and trial trenches.The aim of this paper is to examine and compare the results of the standard MTC prediction model method applied in Messenia with another location, that of the valley of Spercheios, in Fthiotida, Greece.In the spatial analysis carried out in Messenia, common features were observed for all the residential places, which in no case could be characterised as random, while the structure of the administration of the society presented characteristics that were compatible with a hierarchical distinction of the functions of each residential ensemble.The key question is whether we can observe these same characteristics that determine a habitation site (geomorphological, climatological, and geological) in another region. This comparison between two major study areas (the regions of Messenia and the wider valley of Spercheios) may contribute to archaeological research generally by posing new questions and methods of examination of the broader landscape in an area of archaeological interest.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study30its delta-shaped outlet in the Maliakos Gulf and dividing its basin into a northern and southern part. The southern part is the one that presents the most intense relief, with the highest elevation (Maggidis et al., 2021; Psomiades, 2010).The diference between the two parts is caused by the fact that the central bed of the river Spercheios lies in a tectonic depression, where the southern part rises while the northern part sinks (Figure 2) due to the earthquake fault of Atalanti (Mariolakos, 1970; Gartzos and Stamatis, 1996; Tzanis et al., 2010; Mentzafou et al.,2020). The hydrologic system of the basin, which includes the river and six main tributaries, forms a well-watered fertile valley with rich alluvial soil (described by Homer as “large-lumped” ΙliadΙ.155, ΙΧ.363) and having its own micro-climates (Efthimiou et al., 2015, Mertzanis et al.,2018, Spyrou et al., 2021).The total size of the Spercheios valley area amounts to 683,225 acres (276,610 ha), while its perimeter is about 165 kilometres. Administratively the area belongs to two municipalities, the Municipality of Lamia (the largest part, 79%), and the Municipality of Makrakomi, the rest (21%) of the total study area (Figure 3a). Regarding the administrative division of the area, it is worth mentioning that the entire study area includes 44 local communities, 33 of which are under the Municipality of Lamia and the other 11 under the Municipality of Makrakomi.The selected boundaries of the study area were chosen such that they are identical and tangential to the already implemented boundaries of the local communities (Figure 3b). This was done for two main reasons: frstly, the use of the already existing boundaries would make the descriptive identifcation of the land easier when determining positions, and for the writing of necessary technical reports to the authorities and institutions involved; secondly, the geographical simplifcation of the boundary design would require no new key of spatial design features to be identifed. Furthermore, there was no restriction on the geographical distribution of space. The extended proposal of the convergence of the geographical boundaries with those of the study area was chosen, even though they are separated from the natural geomorphological characteristics such as rivers, gorges, mountains, etc.(Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2018; Malaperdas, 2019; Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2019). The modern coastal area and the delta of the river Spercheios were not included in the archaeological investigation, since these areas have been largely silted up with alluvial deposits from the river in post-Mycenaean periods.In June 2018, the archaeogeophysical survey commenced in the Lamia Municipality under the directorship and auspices of the local Ephorate of Antiquities, focusing initially on sites documented from publications and previous feld reports (Simpson and Lazenby, 1959; Kase, 1972; Kase, 1973; Chourmouziadis, 1979; Simpson, 1981; Dakoronia, 1991; Dakoronia, 1994; Dakoronia, 1999; Karantzali, 2013; Karantzali and McGeorge, 2013; Karantzali, 2016; Karantzali, 2018; Maggidis et al.,2021). Using DGPS and mobile GPS devices, sites excavated or discovered in the past were located, identifed and recorded along with new sites found throughout the survey area. These coordinates, accompanied by photographs and descriptions, were imported to ArcGIS for further geospatial and geomorphological analysis, and also included aspect, slope, hydrology, geo-seismic evidence, geomorphology and geology of the area.In order to accomplish this, a TOPCON GPS positioning station was utilised to collect archaeological data, spatially integrate data into the area, and record the coordinates of archaeological sites on-site. The phase “kinematic approach” Figure 1.Site location on the map of Greece.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study31(RTK – Real Time Kinematic) was applied by the TOPCON GPS station to precisely calculate a location with a variance of a few millimetres to one centimetre. The Transverse Mercator Projection TM87 of the Greek Geodetic Reference System 1987 (EGSA ‘87) was used to gather coordinates and analyse data. The Greek Geodetic Reference System (GGRS87) is a uniform projection system that is utilised in both the private and public sectors in Greece.In the feld survey, priority was given to visiting sites that had been excavated or located in the past. The research team physically visited all these locations, which have only been mentioned descriptively in the bibliography. Field trips were organised in collaboration with the local Ephorate of Antiquities and with the guidance of local guards and workmen. During these visits, the research team would also inspect the local geomorphology and environment (on foot and with the use of a drone-mounted camera) in order to identify signifcant natural features or essential sources in the vicinity of the located sites (e.g., low hills and water sources for settlements, soft bedrock for cemeteries of rock-cut chamber tombs) as potential diagnostic evidence for inhabitation. As a result, eight new sites, so far unknown, were located and identifed in the process, thus enabling the application of geocumulative geospatial analysis Figure 2.The topographic sections in the basin of Spercheios (edited by Karli, 2013).Figure 3.a) The administrative division of the study area within the boundaries of the municipalities. b) The administrative division of the study area based on the boundaries of the local communities.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study32and frequency/spatial distribution models to explore the interaction between environment and site distribution, trace contact patterns and hierarchical dynamics among sites, and identify second-order centres and possibly a frst-order administrative centre in the region. The use of GPS in the feld was highly efective for recording coordinates and geo-referencing, but also for plotting, positioning, laying out, and measuring equal parallel transects for the systematic feld survey of selected sites by the research team. All the data collected from the feld survey, in combination with the bibliographic references and the pre-existing GIS data, formed the framework for the partial reconstruction of the historical landscape. As the research continues all the new data and the small discrepancies that may occur will be incorporated into the model.2. MethodsThe methodology provided in this work is based on the latest knowledge of the predictive models that we currently use now, with the goal of evolving them and proposing an overall new way of thinking about predictive models in the future. These new models also take into account a crucial factor: the incorporation of critical thinking into each model’s decision-making process. The new model proposed in this study is called the Model Trend Calculation (MTC), and it is based on Popper’s Three Worlds theory (Popper, 1978). Since the idea of critical thinking is a basic principle in epistemology, a theorem based on Popper’s Three Worlds theory was established to defne the new model (MTC) in a decision-making framework and simplify it in terms of future use by researchers. The full analysis of the habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC) has been presented in detail by Malaperdas and Zacharias (Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2019).The MTC prediction model incorporates a number of criteria deemed critical in the selection of a habitation location. The MTC model was also modifed to meet the requirements of research by creating multiple raster fles that were multiplied by their respective weights (Saha, Gupta, and Arora, 2002; Pandey, Dabral, and Chowdary, 2008; Kouli, Loupasakis, and Soupios, 2010).The central idea of a predictive model based on Popper’s Three Worlds theory ofers signifcant advantages over past predictive models, including recent publications (Argyriou et.al, 2017; Oguz-Kirza, 2017; Healey et. al., 2017), and theoretically it can serve as a guide for future Archaeological Sites Prediction models.Unlike all previous prediction models, this one is unique in that it introduces the concept of causality, or the causal relationship between two events (cause and efect), when the second situation emerges with certainty from the frst. With this critical thinking, the researcher not only understands the model’s probable consequences, but also the precise application of each indicator (index) utilised. Furthermore, the indicators can be revalidated utilising physical observations of the investigated items, as well as the viewpoint of crucial social elements of the observer and the studied case, through the model itself. As a result, there is a clear cause-and-efect relationship (Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2019).One example of the elevation parameter, which is widely encountered in archaeological publications and prediction models, will be examined in order to better expound on this subject. The elevation quantifcation is usually deemed sufcient when examining a site in terms of its geomorphological data. However, the elevation parameter alone does not provide a complete picture of the investigated location, because a 100-metre-elevated site could be at the top of a small hill, serving as an observatory, or at the edge of a large mountain range, in the centre of a wide plain or between two tight valleys; in each case the archaeological perception and interpretation would be diferent (Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2019).In the MTC model, the precise location is thoroughly stated based on all these geomorphological parameters, in order to study all the elements that will give the whole geomorphology of the site location with the maximum degree of precision. The Hillslope Classifcation index is coupled with the specifc elevation, which examines all probable possibilities for a particular location, ranging from being at the top of a hill to successive subcategories down to ground level (valley foor). Subsequently, the result uses the Topographical Index to determine the accuracy of the position in relation to the site’s broader geomorphology, which answers the question of whether the sites are located in a valley or in a hilly area, and at what degree of terrain inclination. Finally, the parameter of Landform Classifcation is used to determine with absolute accuracy the position under examination, indicating whether a site is located on a hill, mountain, canyon, or on a plain (Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2019).In this way, the question of habitation position in relation to the geomorphology factor examined by the predictive model is fully answered; moreover, not only is a numerical determination of the position provided, but new questions can be generated, creating thoughts and discussions in the archaeological community. The climatic (with the data analysed relating to indexes of Aspect, Solar Radiation, Heat Load and Wind Intensity) and geological factors (with the data analysed relating to Geological Formation, Wetness Index, and Distance from the Hydrographic Network) also lead to similar results (Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2019).3. Theories and reasoningThe Mycenaean world fourished in the 14thand 13thcentury BC (circa 1420/1410–1200/1175 BC). This period (LH IIIA/B) is marked by regional centralisation of power, state formation, and advanced socio-economic organisation, geared towards an efcient surplus, local production and overseas trade, coordinated and regulated by the palace administration and sustained by palatial bureaucracy. In the homeland, the Mycenaean palaces were fortifed into citadels,
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study33public works were carried out, agricultural production and farming were systematised (Shelmerdine, 2001; Shelmerdine and Bennet, 2008); abroad, the Mycenaean’s assumed control over the Minoan colonies and trade outposts in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean, and further expanded to the east and west, thus frmly establishing their own trade network and successfully succeeding the Minoans in overseas trade (Iakovidis, 1974; Kantor, 1997; Maggidis, 2009; Karantzali, 2005). The Mycenaean political geography comprised a network of several Mycenaean palace-states that emerged at key inland, coastal or island locations in the Peloponnese, southern mainland Greece, and Crete, achieving striking cultural homogeneity and uniformity in material culture (palatial architecture, ceramic styles, script and language, burial customs and religion) with regional variations and local traditions, known as Mycenaean koine (14th– 13thcentury BC) (Shelmerdine, 2001; Treuil Rene et al., 1990). Mycenae was the primary centre of this period and was frst to be discovered by Schliemann in 1874. Thus, Aegean prehistory was established with the excavations of Schliemann. His fndings at Mycenae were so impressive that it was considered natural to use the term “Mycenaean” for similar archaeological sites found in the following years at many Aegean sites (Dickinson, 1994; Sprakes, 2002).In the course of the 12thcentury BC, the cumulative efect of combined, rapid and dramatic changes in several socio-economic, political, and environmental variables, triggered by events-catalysts, afected a fragile balance, thus resulting in catastrophic systems collapse which caused the decline and fall of several interconnected states and empires in the Mediterranean (Knapp and Manning, 2016; Cline, 2014; Maggidis, 2009). In Mycenaean Greece, the deterioration of the same system that had supported central palatial authority resulted inevitably in the rapid dissolution of palatial power, and the decentralisation and fragmentation of the Mycenaean palace states (Lemos and Kotsonas, 2020; Knapp and Manning, 2016; Middleton, 2010; Maggidis, 2009; Shelmerdine, 2001).The collapse of the palatial system was accelerated by internal conficts, which brought either the Mycenaean states against each other or diferent classes of the population (Hooker, 1976). It was the Mycenaean elite and its diagnostic elements (palatial administration and writing, foreign contacts and luxury goods, monumental art and architecture, representational arts and crafts) that sufered the most from the system meltdown, whereas at the lower level the impact was less direct; despite poverty, isolation, and depopulation on the mainland, the remaining core of Mycenaean society changed more gradually in terms of basic material culture and cultural practices, evolving organically into the Early Iron Age Greece (Karouzou, 2020; Livieratou, 2020; Maggidis, 2019; Knapp and Manning, 2016; Livieratou, 2012; Maggidis, 2009; Lemos, 2002; Shelmerdine, 2001).The region of the Spercheios valley features certain environmental, geomorphological, agrarian, and geopolitical parameters that, if considered collectively, may be construed as diagnostic formative elements of Mycenaean palace states. Due to its key geopolitical location at the crossroads between powerful Mycenaean palace states on either side (Iolkos in the north; Orchomenos, Thebes, and Glas in the south) and other adjacent areas with strong Mycenaean presence (Lokris, Euboea), this region could exert control on land routes and regulate local and interregional trade (Simpson and Lazenby, 1959; Kase, 1972; Kase, 1973; Kase et al.1991; Karantzali, 2013, p.151; Maggidis et al., 2021). Furthermore, the Spercheios valley is agronomically ideal for large-scale agriculture in terms of land size, irrigation, soil quality, and its potential for intensifcation of cultivation and extensifcation of arable land, thus securing local autonomy, self-sufciency, and probably surplus (Maggidis et al., 2021).Paradoxically, however, the archaeological map of the Spercheios region is incompatible with its geopolitical importance and economic potential. In the last two centuries, archaeological feldwork has been carried out sporadically in the Spercheios valley (Marinatos, 1940) with rather poor results, partially because feld research often aimed not at the surrounding hills (habitual location of Mycenaean settlements), but at the modern valley foor; it was therefore being hindered by local geological processes (deep silting from the river and the sinking of the southern part of the valley foor by 10–20 metres). Recent work by the local archaeological Ephorate (Chourmouziadis, 1979; Dakoronia, 1991; Dakoronia, 1994; Dakoronia, 1999; Papakonstantinou and Sakkas, 2010; Karantzali, 2013; Karantzali, 2016; Karantzali, 2020, pp.906–907) has located and partially excavated a few Mycenaean sites and cemeteries, such as the important cemetery at Kompotades, that has yielded large chamber tombs with exquisite fnds, imported luxury goods, and artifacts of high social status – thus indicating a region that may be moderately secluded but not isolated, combining local autonomy and self-sufciency with interregional contacts (Karantzali, 2013; Karantzali and McGeorge, 2013; Karantzali, 2018; Karantzali, 2021).Dickinson states that “The climate, the landscape, and the natural resources of Greece must always be considered in every historical study because they are directly related to the possibilities of the evolution of societies”(Dickinson, 1994). The same point of view is also shared by other researchers. Nowadays, we know that the ancient Greeks, at least from the classical era onwards, had special knowledge of the bioclimatic conditions prevailing in a place and tried to exploit them (Hughes, 1994; Bradshaw and Sykes, 2014; Solari, 2019). In Xenophon’s memoirs (Apomnemoneumata III.8.8-10), Socrates speaks of the ideal solar house (Pantelakis, 1937). At the same time, Hippocrates (On Airs, Waters and Places, I.1.1-16), prefgured the principles of modern bioclimatic architecture (Barrois, 1816). The core of all the theories developed at that time was to ensure a harmonious relationship between man and his environment. Aristotle (Politics A.1) remarks that ensuring the right climatic conditions is the overriding priority for the establishment of the ideal city, since, in addition to the issue of public health, climatic conditions will also play an enormous role
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study34in the self-sufciency of food by determining the crop of the felds (Tzioka-Evangelou, 2009). In particular, the climate, soil quality, and irrigation potential are key factors for the success of a crop and therefore the welfare of the inhabitants.Of the total study area in Messenia and on the basis of the residential classifcation, as presented in their paper (Malaperdas and Zacharias, 2019), the two hierarchically most important categories of settlements were selected to be examined. These constitute thirty (30) of the one hundred and forty (140) Mycenaean settlements of Messenia and characterising classes of Centres and Large Villages. The rationale for this choice is that these two categories, apart from the importance of the sites themselves (based on the archaeological fnds, the area occupied by the number of sherds found, the existence of vaulted tombs in association with the sites, and the bibliographic references), are at the same time the clearest example of correlations.These correlations cannot be random for two main reasons: (a) the factorisation criteria are sufcient in number (twelve, to be randomly identifed in such a large and diverse area as the one occupied by the prefecture of Messenia), and (b) the close values of the sample in the Ideal Valueof conditions of the model horizon (closed sets) verify that specifc conditions prevail in the choice of place of residence by the Mycenaeans in Messenia. Consequently, as the categories decrease hierarchically, there is a gradual corresponding departure from the Ideal Value.It should be noted that the number of Mycenaean settlements found in the valley of Spercheios is much smaller. For this reason, and in order to reduce as much as possible Figure 4.A GIS cartographic composition of the Examining Factors.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study35the inequality of the number of places between these two study areas, we decided to fnally focus on the frst two and most powerful habitation categories.4. Results: Applying the model; the case study of FthiotidaIn the second study case, in the Prefecture of Fthiotida, new characteristic data were observed which difer from the frst case study, that of the Prefecture of Messenia. For this reason, the MTC model was adapted and reconfgured based on the new conditions we encountered in Fthiotida. After analysing the data for each habitation site, the weight of the factors was redefned and the factors were recalibrated, giving the fnal classes of the model (Figure 4).More specifcally, for the creation of the fnal prediction map of the MTC model, all the parameters with the corresponding weighting factor were used. The three factors (Geomorphological, Climatological, and Geological) operated together to give an aggregate of the fnal result and more specifcally, the following equation was used:MTC = 0.372 * FMr + 0.274 * FCl + 0.354 * FGl1Likewise, these parameters in the MTC model that were developed for the prefecture of Messenia, were classifed into fve fnal categories, ranked from those with the lowest satisfaction rates of the model’s criteria to those with higher values, which are also the areas with the highest probability of habitation (Figure 5).There were ten places considered residential sites. Based on the predictive map, six of them were classifed in category 4 (moderate to high probability), three in category 5 (high probability), and only one, in category 3 (moderate probability).The initial observation is that the model gave satisfactory results as nine of the ten residential sites were classifed in the highest settlement probability categories of the model (Categories 4 and 5) while only one of them was in the immediately lower one (Category 3).It is also noteworthy that for the frst two categories of the model (Category 1: low probability and Category 2: low to moderate probability) and despite the fact that they occupy a signifcant percentage (37%) of the total study area, none of the examining sites are located in such areas.One of the main criticisms of the prediction models is the fact that most of the time researchers are satisfed with a computer image, which is extracted by the model, without the possibility of matching this data with the necessary archaeological research and feld examination, at least for those selected sites that have a higher probability of prediction.This is mainly because the frst site prediction models were developed for environmental, ecological and spatial studies. When, for example, a waste treatment plant had to be sited, with specifc conditions and constraints, the scientists examined the locations derived from the model, without the need for on-site investigation and autopsy, which is not the case for archaeological research.1Where ΜTC represents the residential suitability index, FMr represents the Factor GeoMorphology, FCl stands for the Factor Climate and FGl represents the Factor Geology.MTC = 0.045 * Elvindex + 0.088 * Slpindex + 0.118 * HClindex + 0.066 * LFrindex + 0.055 * TPIindex + 0.105 * Aspindex + 0.054 * Solindex + 0.052 * Htlindex + 0.063 * Wndindex + 0.149 0.079 Wetindex + 0.126 * Hydindex - where Elvindex = Elevation Index, Slpindex = Slope Index, HClindex = Hillslope Classifcation Index, LFrindex = Landform Classifcation Index, TPiindex = Terrain Position Index, Aspindex = Aspect Index, Solindex = Solar Radiation Index, Ht Load Index, Wndindex = Wind Intensity Index, Glfndex = Geological Formation Index, Wetindex = Wetness Index, Hydindex = Hydrographic approximate Index.Figure 5.Predictive map of the MTC model applied in the Spercheios Valley case study.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study36For this reason, and following the completion of the MTC model prediction results, two in situ surveys, were carried out on indicative, high probability sites (Category 5) suggested by the model in collaboration with the project archaeologists in charge of the MY.SPE.AR. Project (Figure 6). Sites were selected in areas of high-density concentration and where there is potential for feldwork, avoiding private land as far as possible. Sites that yielded archaeological material (shells, pottery, stone tools) during the surveys were reported to the competent authorities for further investigation.Finally, the required surveying were conducted, a list of eight (8) new sites was created, derived from the model and presented visually on the Google Earth map (Figure 7). Again, all the locations relate to high probability areas based on the prediction model. As part of the MY.SPE.AR. Project, surface surveys are planned to be carried out at some or all of the new locations.5. DiscussionIf we compare the same features between the two diferent study areas examined in this paper, signifcant diferences are observed. This is only logical, considering the geomorphological area of the Spercheios Valley is very diferent from the landscape in Messenia.The valley of Spercheios is surrounded on three sides by high mountains. The highest elevations are found at its southern and western boundaries, namely, the mountain range of Vardousia (2,437 m), the mountain of Oiti (2,152 m), and the ridge of Timfristos (2,316 m). The south-eastern part of the valley, which exits into the sea, is delineated by Mount Kallidromo (1,372 m). To the north, Mount Othris (1,727 m) completes the geomorphology of the area.The valley of Spercheios is essentially the fat part of the basin, surrounded by high ridges. Small hills, with Figure 6.(a) Field survey in suggested site 1 (b) Archaeological Section after survey in suggested site 2.Figure 7.Suggested sites for surveying based on the MTC model.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study37a maximum elevation of about 200 metres, compose the landscape of the valley. Regarding the slopes of the terrain, the whole northern part defned by Mount Othris presents small and gentle slopes in a smooth relief in contrast to the southern one, which is formed by the mountain range of Oiti and has steep morphological slopes in an intense relief with deep ravines that feed the river Spercheios.In order to better understand the diference in terms of the geomorphology we observe that in Messenia the highest mountain is Mount Taygetos, which is located in the eastern part of the prefecture (2,407 m). According to Higgins, Mount Taygetos regulates the climatic conditions for the whole prefecture; as a result, the rainfall in the Messenia Prefecture is twice than in the neighbouring Laconia Prefecture, making the Messenia soils more fertile (Higgins, 1996, p.51). Examining the study area in terms of climatic factors, no signifcant diferences are observed with those presented in Messenia, although in Fthiotida the climate is colder, especially in the winter months. In general, the climate of the valley of Spercheios belongs to the subtropical Mediterranean zone, with hot, dry summers and wet, mild winters, while the areas with elevations above 500 m are characterised by a mountainous continental climate with cold winters (Efthymiou et al., 2005).In terms of geological factors, it should be noted that almost the entire plain and semi-mountainous part of the Spercheios valley is composed of Quaternary deposits, alluvial deposits, ridge cones, lateral ridges, erythrocyte deposits of the Neolithic age, and sedimentary deposits of the Pleistocene (Karli, 2013). In other words, porous rocks are also found here, in extensive and high-yield aquifers suitable for both cultivation and construction material.The main diferences and similarities regarding the main factors and between the two examined areas are summarised in the Table 1.6. ConclusionsIn summary, the results obtained after the examination of the factors between the data for the two study areas display small diferences, mainly in the frst two factors, those of geomorphology and climatology. The diferent geomorphology of the two regions contributes to this. The valley of Spercheios is a lowland area, surrounded by high mountains that defne the terrain and regulate the climatic conditions of the entire valley. The region of Messenia presents a greater diversity in terms of its relief and the area under examination is much larger. Despite the diferentiation of the geological layers between the two areas, it is observed that the habitation sites in both case studies are located in geological formations suitable for soil fexibility and their likely usage as building materials for all kinds of construction by the ancient societies, but also for agricultural exploitation.However, as mentioned above, it is important to emphasise the fact that in the case of the Spercheios River valley, the number of habitation sites is signifcantly reduced compared to those of the region of Messenia. The data examined appear to have some common characteristics, but will require new as well as further data to be able to draw more reliable conclusions.On the other hand, the results of the implementation of the MTC Predictive Model in the region of Fthiotida are clearer and particularly encouraging. The model appears to be highly accurate, recognising nine out of ten habitation sites in the highest occupancy probability categories 4 and 5. It is worth mentioning here, that, in general, for the forecast model to be considered satisfactory, the frst two hierarchically residential categories are expected to be in those categories of the model: (5) High probability; and (4) Moderate to High probability.The important advantages of the MTC prediction model that apply in the case of the Spercheios valley are the following:a) It can be easily adapted to questions of interest to the researcher, incorporating and creating more complex and critical thinking in the fnal prediction model.b) It is not just another computer-aided model of predictive results, but a model that can be a useful guide to feld archaeological research.c) Based on the methodology developed for the creation of the MTC model, access to interdisciplinary Table 1.Similarities and diferences between the two cases (Messenia and Fthiotida)FactorMain Diferences and Similarities GeomorphologyThe valley of Spercheios, which is essentially the lowland part of the basin, is a fat area surrounded by high ridges. Small hills with maximum altitudes of around 200 metres make up the landscape of the valley. In contrast to Messenia, the highest mountain in the valley is Mount Taygetos, located in the eastern part of the prefecture, while its geomorphology is varied throughout the western part of the prefecture. Smaller mountains and hills emerge in the landscape forming many geomorphological variations that during the Mycenaean period were more favourable to the places of habitation.ClimateRegarding climatic factors, there are no signifcant diferences between Fthiotida and Messenia, although in Fthiotida the climate is colder, especially in the winter months.Regarding the aspect that was the most important climatic factor in the case of Messenia, it is observed that here too the majority of places are located in lands of a southern orientation in general (Malaperdas and Panagiotidis, 2017).GeologyIn terms of geological factors, it is observed in both cases that the geological formations around the vast majority of sites are suitable for both cultivation and construction material.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study38questions is easier and faster; to some extent, this is because the factors are already standardised and can give a better evaluation of the results.We will continue this research, as – with the completion of the fve-year project and following the processing and categorisation of the new sites produced by the project’s team of archaeologists – we hope to have a new list of more settlement sites and can review their characteristics and possible variations. This will be particularly useful, as it will provide a new insight into the pattern of features; we will be able to know the sample size that our model will need in order to work to a satisfactory degree. Finally, with the planned feldwork at eight (8) more potential sites produced by the predictive model, we will always be able, with the help of archaeological feldwork, to test and evaluate the efectiveness of the predictive model.AcknowledgementsThis project was implemented within the scope of the “Exceptional Laboratory Practices in Cultural Heritage: Upgrading Infrastructure and Extending Research Perspectives of the Laboratory of Archaeometry”, co-fnanced by Greece and the European Union project under the auspices of the program “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” NSRF 2014–2020.ReferencesARGYRIOU, A.V., TEEUW, R.M., SARRIS, A., 2017. “GIS-based landform classifcation of Bronze Age archaeological sites on Crete Island.” PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0170727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170727BARROIS, P.T., 1816. Traite d’ Hippocrate des airs, des eaux et des lieux.Paris: Théophile Barrois.BRADSHAW, R.H.W., and SYKES, M.T., 2014. Ecosystem dynamics: from the past to the future.Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.CHOURMOUZIADIS, G., 1979. Anaskafkesereunes: Kastro Lamias. Archaeologikon Deltion, 29 (1973–74), 519–520.CLINE, E., 2014. 1177 BC: The Year Civilization Collapsed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.DAKORONIA, F., 1991. Late Helladic III, Submycenaean and Protogeometric fnds in the Specheios valley. In: E.W. Kase, G.J. Szemler, N.C. Wilkie, P.W. Wallace, eds. The Great Isthmus Corridor Route: Explorations of the Phokis-Doris Expedition. Publications in Ancient Studies, 3, Vol. I. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall / Hunt, pp. 70–73.DAKORONIA, F., 1994. The Spercheios Valley and adjacent area in the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age. In: Thessaly: Dekapente Chronia Archaeologikis Ereunas, 1975–1990. Apotelesmata kai Prooptikes, Praktika Diethnous Synedrioy Lyon, 17–22 April 1990. Vol. Α-Β, Athens: Hypourgeio Politismou / Ekdoseis Kapon, pp. 233–242.DAKORONIA, F., 1999. Nomos Phtiotidas: meros tou Mykinaikou Kosmou i tis Peripheriastou. In: I Periphereia tou Mykinaikou Kosmou, Praktika A΄ Diepistimonikou Symposiou, 25–29 September 1994. Lamia, Ministry of Culture Editions, pp. 181–186.DICKINSON, O. 1994. The Aegean Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.EFTHYMIOU, G., MERTZANIS, A., SAPOUNTZIS, M., and ZAKYNTHINOS, G., 2005. Anthropogenic infuences in the Specheios Delta; Measures for protection, promotion and management of natural ecosystems.International exhibition and conference on environmental technology. Athens: HELECO.EFTHYMIOU, G., TSIREKIS, E., MERTZANIS, A., and SAKELLARAKIS, F.N., 2015. Riparian forest ecosystems and anthropogenic efects: The case of the middle course of the Sperchios River (GR2440002), Central Greece. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning & Economics, Mykonos Island, Greece, June 14–18, 2015, pp. 698–705.GARTZOS, E., and STAMATIS, G., 1996. Genesis of the thermal springs of the Sperchios graben, Greece. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie – Abhandlungen, 2, 91–115.HEALEY, A., LIPPITT, C.D., PHILLIPS, D., and LANE, M., 2017. A comparison of suitability models to identify prehistoric agricultural felds in western New Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 11, 427–434.HIGGINS, C.G., 1966. Possible Disappearance of Mycenaean Coastal Settlements of the Messenian Peninsula. American Journal of Archaeology, 70(1), 23–29.HOOKER, J.T., 1976. Mycenaean Greece. Berkley: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Incorporated, University of California.HUGHES, D., 1994. Environmental Problems of the Greek and Romans: Ecology of the Ancient Mediterranean.2nded. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.IAKOVIDIS, S., 1974. The Centuries of Achaian Sovereignty: Expansion. In: G. Phylaktopoulos, ed. History of the Hellenic World. Prehistory and Protohistory.Vol. I. Athens: Penn State University Press, pp. 268–302.KANTOR, H.J., 1997. The Aegean and the Orient in the Second Millennium B.C.Boston: Archaeological Institute of America.KARANTZALI, E., 2005. The Mycenaeans at Ialysos: Trading station or Colony? In: R. Lafneur, and E. Greco, eds. Emporia. Aegeans in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean. Aegaeum, 25. Proceedings of the 10thInternational Aegean Conference, Athens 2004. Liège: Université de Liège, pp. 141–150.KARANTZALI, E., 2013. Mycenaeans within the Spercheios Valley: The Inhabitations at Frantzis and Lygaria. In: G.R. Graziado, V. Gyglielmino, V. Lenuzza, S. Vitale, eds.Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology for Mario Benzi. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 139–153.KARANTZALI, E., 2016. A Middle Helladic apsidal house at Frantzi in the Spercheios valley. Stratigraphic evidence of the MH III-LH I period. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts Athenische Abteilung, 129/130 (2014/2015), 37–75.KARANTZALI, E., 2018. I prwti chrisi tou nekrotafeiou ston Profti Ilia stis Kompotades Phiotidas kata tin Ysteroelladiki periodo. In: M.-F. Papakwnstantinou, C. Kritzas, and I.P. Tourasoglou, eds. Pyrra – Meletes gia tin archailogia stin Kentriki Ellada pros timin tis Fanouria Dakorwnia. Athens: Proistorikoi Chronoi, pp. 93–133.KARANTZALI, E., 2020. Taytopoiisi kai xaraktirismos tis prwimis Mykinaikis periodou ston oikismo Frantzi stin koilada tou Spercheiou. In: Praktika Epistimonikis Synantisis gia to Arxaiologiko Ergo Thessaliaskai Stereas Elladas Proceedings 2012–2014.5οAEUSE. Central Greece. Volos 2020, Vol. II, 901–920.KARANTZALI, E., 2021. H Mykinaiki taftotita tis koiladas tou Spercheiou: koinonia kai diaxronia. In: E. Karantzali, ed. Proceedings of the 3rdInternational Interdisciplinary Colloquium. The Periphery of the Mycenaean World: Recent Discoveries and Research Results, Lamia 2018. Athens: Ministry of Culture and Sports, pp. 175–192.KARANTZALI, E., and T. McGEORGE, 2013. I diachroniki chrisi tou nekrotafeiou ston Profti Ilia stis Kompotades Pthiotidas: Mia prwti proseggisi me vasei ta eurimata tou tafou IV. In: Phtiotiki Istoria – Praktika 5thSynedriou Phtiotikis Istorias (Istoria, Archaeologia, Laografa), 16–18 April 2010. Almiros, pp. 51–93.KAROUZOU, E., 2020. Thessaly. In: I. Lemos, and A. Kotsonas, eds. A Companion to the Archaeology of Early Greece and the Mediterranean. Blackwell companions to the ancient world 1. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 883–912.KARLI, A., 2013. Hydrogeological and hydrochemical conditions of the aquifers of the Spercheios river basin. MSc Thesis, Department of Geology, University of Patras.KASE, W., 1972. A Surface Exploration in Search of Mycenaean Roads in Nomos Fokidhos and Nomos Fthiatidhos. Unpublished thesis (PhD.), Loyola University, Chicago.KASE, W., 1973. Mycenaean Roads in Phokis. American Journal of
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2022 ● XIII/1 ● 29–39George Malaperdas, Christoflis Maggidis, Ef Karantzali, Nikolaos Zacharias: The Habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): Ancient Topography – The Mycenaean Spercheios Valley Case Study39Archaeology, 77, 74–77.KASE, W., and SZEMLER, G.J., 1991. The Isthmus corridor road system from the Valley of Spercheios to Kirrha on the Krisaian Gulf. In: N.C. Wilkie, and P.W. Wallace, eds. The Great Isthmus Corridor Route: Explorations of the Phokis-Doris Expedition. Publications in Ancient Studies, 3. Vol. I, pp. 21–45.KNAPP, A.B., and MANNING, S.W., 2016. Crisis in context: the end of the Late Bronze Age in the eastern Mediterranean. American Journal of Archaeology, 120(1), 99–149.KOULI, M., LOUPASAKIS, C., SOUPIOS, P., 2010. Landslide Hazard Zonation in High-Risk Areas of Rethymno Prefecture, Crete Island, Greece. Natural Hazards, 52(3), 599–621. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-009-9403-2LEMOS, I.S., 2002. The Protogeometric Aegean: The Archaeology of the Late Eleventh and Tenth Centuries BC.Oxford Monographs on Classical Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.LEMOS, L.S., and KOTSONAS, A., 2020. A Companion to The Archaeology of Early Greece and the Mediterranean.Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.LIVIERATOU, A., 2012. Phokis and East Lokris in the Light of Interregional Contacts at the Transition from the Late Bronze to the Early Iron Age. In: M. Iacovou, ed. Cyprus and the Aegean in the Early Iron Age: The Legacy of Nicolas Coldstream.Nicosia: Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation, pp. 77– 127.LIVIERATOU, A., 2020. “East Locris and Phocis” In: Lemos, I. and Kotsonas, A. eds., A Companion to the Archaeology of Early Greece and the Mediterranean. Blackwell companions to the ancient world 1. Hoboken, U.S.: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 815–835.MAGGIDIS, C., 2009. Mycenaean Palatial Overextension and the Dynamics of the Systems Collapse of the Mycenaean World. In: D. Danielidou, ed. Doron. Studies in Honor of Professor Sp. Iakovidis.Academy of Athens Monographs, 6, Athens: Academy of Athens, pp. 397–418.MAGGIDIS, C., 2019. Glas and Boeotia. In: G. Middleton, ed. Collapse and Transformation: The Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age in the Aegean. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 107–120.MAGGIDIS, C., KARANTZALI, E., PSYCHAS, A., 2021. Reassessing a Peripheral Geopolitical Vacuum: The Case for a Mycenaean Palace State in the Spercheios Valley Region. In: K. Żebrowska, A. Ulanowska, K. Lewartowski eds., 7thConference in Aegean Archaeology (University of Warsaw, Poland, June 6–7, 2019). Sympozjum Egejskie, Papers in Aegean Archaeology 4, University of Warsaw Press, pp. 120–128.MALAPERDAS, G., 2019. Practical Methods of GIS for Archaeologists: Spatial Division in a Large Area. International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science, 6(1), 1–6. DOI: 10.14445/23939206/IJGGS-V6I1P101.MALAPERDAS, G., and ZACHARIAS, N., 2018. A Geospatial Analysis of Mycenaean Habitation Sites Using a Geocumulative versus Habitation Approach. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 6, 111–131.MALAPERDAS, G., and PANAGIOTIDIS, V., 2018. The aspects of aspect: Understanding land exposure and its part in GIS analysis. Energy and Environment, 29(6), 1022–1037. DOI: 10.1177/0958305X18766322.MALAPERDAS, G., and ZACHARIAS, N., 2019. The habitation Model Trend Calculation (MTC): A new efective tool for predictive modelling in archaeology. Geo-spatial Information Science. DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2019.1634320MARINATOS, S., 1940. Forschungen in Thermopylai. In: M. Wenger, ed. Berichtüber den VI Internationalen Congress für Archäologie. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 333–341.MARIOLAKOS, H., 1976. Thoughts and opinions about some problems of Geology and tectonics of the Peloponnese. Annual Geological Pays Hellenistic, 27, 215–313.MENTZAFOU, A., MARKOGIANNI, V., PAPADOPOULOS, A., PAVLIDOU, A., TZIAVOS, C., DIMITRIOU, E., 2020. The Impacts of Anthropogenic and Climatic Factors on the Interaction of Spercheios River and Maliakos Gulf, the Aegean Sea. In: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.MERTZANIS, A., EFTHYMIOU, G., FYKA, I., MERTZANI, A., and KALAMIDAS, S., 2018. Human-induced pressures and eco-environmental impacts on the salt and freshwater wetlands in Phthiotis prefecture (Central Greece). In: L. Cremonini, A. Mertzanis, and G. Efthymiou, eds. Development and Management of the Coastal Area – Scientifc Meeting between Greece and Italy.Bologna: Institute of Biometeorology IBIMET-CNR, pp. 25–35.MIDDLETON, G.D., 2010. The Collapse of Palatial Society in LBA Greece and the Postpalatial Period.Oxford: Archaeopress.OGUZ-KIRCA, E.D., and LIRITZIS, I., 2017. Searching Ancient Territorium of Hygassos in Anatolia: Settlement Patterns and Spatio-Temporal Investigations through Aerial and GIS application. Geojournal, 83, 441–464. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-017-9779-6PANDEY, A., DABRAL, P.P., CHOWDARY, V.M., 2008. Landslide Hazard Zonation Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Case Study of Dikrong River Basin, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Environmental Geology, 54(7), 1517–1529. DOI:10.1007/s00254-007-0933-1PANTELAKIS, E., 1937. Xenophon Memoirs: The life and philosophy of Socrates (ancient text, introduction, translation, notes).Athens: Papyrus Publications.PAPAKONSTANTINOU, M.F., and SAKKAS, D., 2010. Middle Helladic Pottery from Amouri in the Spercheios Valley. In: A. Phillipa-Touchais, G. Touchais, S. Voutsaki, and J. Wright, eds. Mesohelladika. The Greek Mainland in the Middle Bronze Age.Proceedings of the International Conference, Athens 8–12 March 2006, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Suppl. 52, pp. 583–590.POPPER, K., 1978. Three Worlds, The Tanner Lecture on Human Values.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.PSOMIADES, E., 2010. Research of geomorphological and environmental changes in the hydrological basin of the Spercheios river with the use of new technologies.Unpublished thesis (PhD.), Agricultural University of Athens.SAHA, A.K., GUPTA, R.P., ARORA, M.K., 2002. GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bagirathi (Ganga) Valley Himalayas. International Journal of Remote Sensing,23(2), 357–369.SHELMERDINE, C., 2001. Review of Aegean Prehistory VI: The Palatial Bronze Age of the Southern and Central Greek Mainland. In: T. Cullen, ed. Aegean Prehistory. A Review, American Journal of Archaeology, Supplement1. Boston, pp.329–381.SHELMERDINE, C., and BENNET, J., 2008. Mycenaean States and Economy and Administration. In: C. Shelmerdine, ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Aegean Bronze Age.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 289–309.SIMPSON, H.R., and LAZENBY, J.F., 1959. The Kingdom of Peleus and Achilles. Antiquity,3, 102–105.SIMPSON, H.R., 1981. Mycenaean Greece. New Jersey: Park Ridge, Noyes Press.SOLARI, G., 2019. Wind Science and Engineering. Origins, Developments, Fundamentals and Advancements.Springer.SPRAKES, B., 2002. Greek Civilization. Translated in Greek by Leventopoulos. Athens: Kardamitsas.SPYROU, C., LOUPIS, M., CHARIZOPOULOS, Ν., APOSTOLIDOU, I., MENTZAFOU, A., VARLAS, G., PAPADOPOULOS, A., DIMITRIOU, E., PANGA, D., GKEKA, L., BOWYER, P., PFEIFER, S., DEBELE, S.E., and KUMAR, P., 2021. Evaluating Nature-Based Solution for Flood Reduction in Spercheios River Basin under Current and Future Climate Conditions. Sustainability, 13(7), 3885. DOI : 10.3390/su13073885TREUIL, R., DARCQUE, P., POURSAT, J.C., TOUCHAIS, G., 1990. Les civilisations égéennes du Néolithique et de l’Âge du Bronze. L’antiquité Classique, 59, 468–473.TZANIS, A., KRANIS, H., and CHAILAS, S., 2010. An investigation of the active tectonics in central-eastern mainland Greece with imaging and decomposition of topographic and aeromagnetic data. Journal of Geodynamics, 49(2), 55–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.042.TZIOKA-EVANGELOU, P., 2009.Aristotle Politics. Vol. 4. Thessaloniki: Zitros Publications.
image/svg+xml