image/svg+xml19XII/1/2021INTERDISCIPLINARIA ARCHAEOLOGICANATURAL SCIENCES IN ARCHAEOLOGYhomepage: http://www.iansa.euAnalysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)Aaron M. de Souza1*, Martina Trognitz21Austrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Franz Klein-Gasse 1, 1190 Vienna, Austria2Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Sonnenfelsgasse 19, 1010 Vienna, Austria1. IntroductionAccording to the existing framework, the Nile Valley of Lower and Upper Nubia (Figure 1) was populated by three so-called Middle Nubian Cultures – the C-Group, Kerma, and Pan-Grave cultures – during a period spanning c. 1850–1500 BCE (Figure 2). Each of the three groups was defned typologically, based on distinct material culture traditions and patterns of distribution following a now outdated culture-historical approach. The C-Group was thought to be confned primarily to Lower Nubia (Bietak, 1968; Säve-Söderbergh, 1989), the Kerma tradition to Upper Nubia (Edwards, 2004, pp.65–84), while the Pan-Grave tradition comprised mobile or partially mobile groups spread across a vast region from Middle Egypt up to the Fourth Nile Cataract and the surrounding desert regions (Bietak, 1966; Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pp.15–19; de Souza, 2019, pp.140–143). For much of the 20thcentury, these three archaeological cultures were viewed as bounded and distinct entities, but recent research has demonstrated that these divisions can no longer be supported. It is now understood that the Nubian cultural landscape was highly complex and interconnected (Edwards, 2004, pp.10–23; Raue, 2019, pp.293–333), but the outdated divisions persist in scholarly discourse. In the absence of any alternative descriptive system, the labels C-Group, Pan-Grave, and Kerma will be used in this paper for reasons of clarity, albeit with the recognition that those labels need to be urgently revised.In order to investigate these interconnections, the current analysis uses the concept of chaîne opératoire (Gosselain, 2012, pp.244–246; Roux, 2016; D’Ercole et al., 2017, p.554; Gosselain, 2018) as a means for understanding the series of choices made by ancient Nubian potters when making these vessels. According to Gosselain (2012, p.246), the concept is also an analytical tool for documenting and interpreting those technological choices in a systematic way. This study applies Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) to Middle Nubian ceramics in order to identify and analyse physical traces of the vessel-forming process that might otherwise be invisible to the unaided eye or difcult to capture using Volume XII ● Issue 1/2021 ● Pages 19–35*Corresponding author. E-mail: aaron.desouza@oeaw.ac.atARTICLE INFOArticle history:Received: 9thSeptember 2020Accepted: 14thApril 2021DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24916/iansa.2021.1.2Key words:Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)documentationpottery technologysecond millennium BCEtechnological heritagematerial cultureKermaPan-GraveC-GroupABSTRACTRefectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) is a photographic technique used to generate digital surrogates of surfaces that can be viewed using virtual lighting coming from interactively set directions, enabling the close structural examination of objects under digital raking light.In this study, RTI was applied to Middle Nubian pottery from sites near the Second Nile Cataract that were excavated by the Scandinavian Joint Expedition to Sudanese Nubia in the early 1960s. The ceramic traditions under investigation are currently known as C-Group, Pan-Grave and Kerma. An overarching aim of the project is to assess the possibility of understanding the relationships between these groups through detailed analyses of their material traditions. Based on the hypothesis that technological traditions may be related to cultural heritage, RTI is applied in this study to observe morphological traces of ceramic vessel forming processes.Two technological groups were identifed, one consistent with paddle-forming, and another consistent with hand-building on a mat-lined surface. These technological groups correspond very closely to cemetery distributions, which suggests that the diferent techniques may be specifc to diferent pottery-making traditions. It is suggested that vessel forming-technology in the so-called C-Group tradition is distinct from that of the so-called Pan-Grave and Kerma traditions, and that the validity of the divisions between Nubian cultural groups should thus be further interrogated.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)20standard photographic processes (see chapter 4). It will be shown that careful observation of the surface features revealed by the RTI process can assist in identifying similarities or diferences in pottery-making technologies that may in turn be linked to cultural heritage and traditions.2. Research objectiveThe goal of the analysis was to test hypotheses regarding ceramic vessel-forming technologies among the Middle Nubian cultures. It has previously been proposed that Nubian pottery was formed using either the coiling or slab-building method (Arnold, 1993, pp.33–36), or by using a percussive process such as paddle forming (Arnold, 1993, pp.17–20). Both of these methods have been cited as primary forming processes (i.e., the processes used to create the overall vessel shape), and it is likely that both slab building and paddle forming (see chapter 6.1) were employed for diferent types of vessels and perhaps even in combination (Nordström, 1972, pp.47–48; Williams, 1983, pp.29–36). RTI was employed on a group of Middle Nubian vessels selected from the Figure 1. Map of Egypt and Nubia showing the locations of the SJE concession and the sites from which samples were taken. Map by A. de Souza.0 200 km0 5 km0 5 km
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)21Scandinavian Joint Expedition (SJE) collection in order to identify physical traces of vessel-forming technologies that might otherwise be invisible to the unaided eye. These new insights might also revise understandings of Middle Nubian ceramic technologies and, by extension, critically reconsider the existing Nubian cultural divisions.3. Samples and sitesThe samples for the analysis were all selected from objects collected by the Scandinavian Joint Expedition to Sudanese Nubia (the “SJE”), the bulk of which are now housed at the Museum Gustavianum, Uppsala University, Sweden (Säve-Söderbergh, 1970, pp.13–18). All objects were exported from Sudan in accordance with the agreed division of fnds, and full permission to document the objects using RTI was granted by the curatorial staf of the Museum Gustavianum. A total of 25 objects drawn from fve cemetery sites were documented using RTI. The 15 objects that yielded meaningful information are summarised in Table 1. The remaining 10 objects that produced inconclusive results are listed in Table 2.As the aim of the analysis is to look for technological variations between pottery-making traditions according to their current defnitions, the sample selection was limited to objects that could be attributed to one of the existing cultural divisions with relative security. Attributions were based on characteristics such as shape, ware and overall style, as well as considerations of the archaeological contexts in which the objects were found. Regarding chronology, at present there is no absolute chronology for the Middle Nubian traditions and, as such, only a relative sequence can be given.All of the samples are undecorated black-top wares with a range of surface treatments including coated and uncoated, burnished and unburnished. In order to capture as much of the vessel surface as possible, complete or intact objects were prioritised for selection. In cases where intact objects were not available, the largest possible sherds that preserved all or most of the vessel profle were selected for analysis.Ten samples came from SJE Site 65, all of which could be attributed to the so-called C-Group tradition based on morphology, ware, and the character of their respective contexts. SJE Site 65 as a whole may also be attributed to the C-Group tradition and is broadly contemporary with the late Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period on the Egyptian timeline (Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pp.174–180). All of the samples are black-topped bowls with red-coated and burnished exteriors (Figures 5a, 5c, 5e and 6a, 6c, 6e).Five samples were taken from SJE Site 170, which has mostly been attributed to the so-called Pan-Grave cultural horizon (de Souza, 2019, pp.150–153) with some evidence for activity related to the Kerma tradition. The site is roughly contemporary with the late Second Intermediate Period in Egypt (Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pp.192–199). Of the fve samples from Site 170, three could be attributed to the Pan-Grave ceramic tradition based on their overall style and morphology (Table 1; Figures 7c, 7e, 8a). The fourth sample, 170/39:3 (Figure 9), is a small shallow bowl with a mat-impressed exterior that strongly suggests a Kerma attribution based on parallels with the same surface treatment from sites in Upper Nubia (for parallels, see: Rufeux, 2012, fg. 28; Figure 2. Comparative timeline of ancient Egypt and Nubia.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)22Table 1. List of RTI samples that yielded meaningful information.Object No.TraditionPreservationSurface features noted in RTI65/0:9C-GroupIntactParallel ripples from base to rim.65/2:1C-GroupSherdAreas of fat zones, some elongated narrow depressions.65/62A:1C-GroupSherdLarge fat areas to exterior.65/63:1C-GroupSherdLarge fat areas to exterior.65/107:2C-GroupSherdFlat marks toward base, some parallel grooves on max diameter.65/239:4C-GroupCompleteFlat areas to exterior.170/2:1Pan-GraveCompleteSmall circular dimples toward base; vertical burnishing and scrape marks to upper body.170/30:1Pan-GraveIntactClusters of small dimples toward base.170/31:2Pan-GraveIntactClusters of small dimples toward base.170/38:2Pan-Grave?SherdParallel ripples from base to rim.170/39:3Kerma?IntactMat impressed; covered with irregular rounded dimples.266/B.1.2KermaIntactMat impressed; entire exterior surface covered in rows of circular dimples.332/33:2Pan-GraveIntactClusters of dimples toward base.410/7:4KermaSherdMat impressed; covered with impressions of herringbone weave.410/21:2Pan-GraveSherdPatches of small dimples and one large fat area.Table 2.List of RTI samples for which the results were inconclusive.Object No.TraditionPreservationReason for exclusion65/21:1(5)C-GroupSherdRTI taken of interior surface only. Comb scraped surface. 65/64:4(3)C-GroupSherdSherd too small, no traces of forming processes observed. 65/246:1C-Group?SherdsNo traces of forming processes observed. 65/311:2C-GroupSherdSherd too small, no traces of forming processes observed. 170/05:1Pan-Grave?SherdSherd too small, no traces of forming processes observed. 170/37:2KermaIntactKerma beaker; surface highly polished, no traces of forming processes observed.170/37:3KermaIntactKerma beaker; burnishing has erased traces of forming processes.170/46:1Pan-Grave?IntactNo traces of forming processes observed. 410/20:1KermaIncompleteKerma beaker; burnishing has erased traces of forming processes.410/23:1KermaIntactKerma beaker; burnishing has erased traces of forming processes.Rose, 2012, pp.18–21, fg. 4–5; Budka, 2017, fg. 67). The attribution of the ffth sample, 170/38:2, is uncertain, but it has been tentatively assigned to the Pan-Grave ceramic tradition by association and by its macroscopic characteristics (Figure 8c). Four additional samples from this site yielded inconclusive results (Table 2).One vessel comes from grave 266B, which is an isolated burial in the vicinity of a larger cemetery that was attributed by the excavators to the C-Group (Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pp.239–240). The vessel is a large globular jar with a mat-impressed exterior surface that is consistent with examples known from the Kerma tradition.A small black-topped bowl (332/33:2), came from SJE Site 332, which was identifed by the excavators as a “Middle Nubian (C-Group?) and Late Nubian cemetery”, with some earlier elements (Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, p.246). The character of the context is undetermined, but the bowl itself could be attributed to the Pan-Grave tradition based on its overall morphology.Four samples were drawn from SJE Site 410, one of the southernmost sites in the SJE concession located in the vicinity of the second Nile Cataract. This site was described by the excavators as a mixed Pan-Grave and Kerma cemetery and most graves were identifed by loose stone rings at the surface (Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pp.251–254, pl. 158–159). One sherd has an obviously mat-impressed surface consistent with examples known from the Kerma tradition (Figure 4). Another bowl with a defned black-top could be attributed to the Pan-Grave tradition on stylistic grounds (Figure 8a). In addition, two Classic Kerma beakers from this site (Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pl. 23) were documented using RTI, but their highly polished surfaces produced unusable results (Table 2).Regarding chronology, all of the graves, and in particular those from SJE Site 65, were at least partially disturbed and easily dateable objects were almost entirely absent. Based on the pottery forms, it was possible to devise a broad relative sequence. The vessels attributed to the C-Group pottery
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)23tradition are all relatively shallow with tapered bases that are characteristic of a relatively early date, most likely Bietak’s Phase IB or IIA (Bietak, 1968, pp.96–105, Taf. 8; Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pp.7–9), which more or less corresponds to the 12thDynasty in Egypt, c. 2000–1800 BCE. The overall style of the vessels attributed to the Pan-Grave and Kerma traditions as well as their fnd contexts suggest a slightly later date in the Second Intermediate Period in Egypt, c. 1650–1550 BCE. For samples attributed to the Pan-Grave tradition, characteristics such as defned and applied black-tops point to a date during the later phases for that tradition (de Souza, 2019, pp.35–37, pp.119–122). For the mat-impressed wares assigned to the Kerma tradition from SJE Sites 170 and 410, well-dated parallels and the presence of well-known beaker forms point towards a date in the Classic Kerma period (c. 1700–1500 BCE). Overall, it would appear that the C-Group samples from SJE Site 65 are earlier than the Pan-Grave and Kerma samples, which are more or less contemporary with one another.4. The RTI methodRefectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) is a photographic technique used to generate digital surrogates of surfaces that can be viewed with light coming from an interactively set direction, enabling the examination of objects under digital raking light. The method involves taking multiple photographs (the “image stack”) of an object with a camera positioned perpendicularly to it, with a moving light source, i.e., the object and camera remain stationary, but the light source is moved around the object and comes from a diferent angle in each picture. Digital relighting is enabled by the use of Polynomial Texture Maps (PTM), a digital image format that does not store a fxed colour value for each pixel, but instead uses a refectance function to calculate the luminosity of the surface, which infuences how a surface is visually perceived: bright, dark, refective or dim. Simply put, the colour is computed depending on the view settings (e.g.incident light angle) and the surface geometry, i.e., the surface normals, of the captured object (Malzbender et al., 2001, p.521; Trognitz, 2016). Surface normals represent points on a three-dimensional object where a normal can be determined along which, according to the law of refection, extant light is refected in the same angle as incident light (Figure 3). The refectance function allows for an accurate representation of the three-dimensional surface’s shape in a two-dimensional PTM.In order to calculate the PTM from the image stack, the position of the light source in each image must be known. This can be achieved in one of two ways: by using a dome-shaped device with fxed mounted lights that surrounds the object (Malzbender et al., 2001, pp.520–521) or by using a hand-held light source for which the origin can be calculated by using refective spheres placed in the image frame (Mudge et al., 2006). The latter method, known as Highlight RTI (H-RTI), is detailed by CHI (Web CHI b) and Historic England (2018, pp.7–23) and was employed for the present analysis. With H-RTI, a virtual “dome” of light around the object is created by manually positioning the light source along imaginary arcs. The current recommended H-RTI workfow, software for building and viewing an RTI fle, and further related methods were developed by Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI), who openly and freely provide their materials and also ofer in-depth, hands-on training classes.The inherently curved surfaces of the vessels in this analysis required certain considerations in capturing the images. In order to compensate for the curvature, the camera was set to capture an increased depth-of-feld using a wide aperture (F18–22) and prolonged exposure time (up to 2 seconds) to ensure that the entirety of the vessel surface was in focus. The prolonged exposure time in turn dictated that a continuous light source was required, in this case, a hand-held LED torch, rather than a conventional fash. A string attached to the light source assisted in maintaining a consistent distance to the object. The torch was moved along a series of twelve imaginary arcs, each of which comprised four individual images. With three additional images in which the light source was held further away from the object, each object was thus captured with a total of 51 photographs. The last three images were optional and used only if additional flling light was required to brighten the fnal image.The captured image stacks were computed into an RTI fle with the RTIBuilder software developed by Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI) (Web CHI a). The fnished RTI fles can only be viewed with specialised software, in this case, the RTIViewer developed by CHI (Web CHI d) was used. RTIViewer Version 1.1 ofers a range of rendering modes, each with further sub modes and settings (Malzbender et al., 2000; Malzbender et al., 2001, pp.525–526; Palma et al., Figure 3. On a three-dimensional surface the surface normals (red dashed) point into diferent directions. The incident light (yellow) is refected (green) along the surface normal. A PTM (Polynomial Texture Map) stores the surface normals and the incident light angle and can visually provide an accurate representation of the three-dimensional surface in a two-dimensional fle. (CC-BY 4.0 M. Trognitz)
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)242010, pp.6:5–6:7; CHI, 2013, pp.13–23; Schroer, 2014). These rendering algorithms help in enhancing the visual perception of shape and surface detail by, for example, changing material properties of objects or enhancing shape cues provided by shading (Malzbender et al., 2000). Figure 4 serves as an example of the efects that diferent rendering algorithms have on the perception of the object’s shape and surface textures for sample SJE 410/7:4. Of all of the available viewing modes, specular enhancement proved most useful for the current analysis in that it best Figure 4. Sample SJE 410/7:4 rendered using diferent visualisation modes under the same lighting conditions. Each mode enhances the visual perception of shape and surface detail in diferent ways.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)25aided in the visualisation of often very subtle manufacturing traces preserved on the surface of the vessels (Figure 4h; Malzbender et al., 2000; 2001, pp.525). This viewing mode also enables the image to be desaturated and hence brings focus to the structure of the object without the distraction of colour.For archaeological purposes, the RTI process is a versatile, mobile, and relatively low-cost method of documenting objects for detailed digital analysis both in the feld and in a museum or laboratory setting. The mobile equipment enables working in a variety of indoor and outdoor settings, including remote areas and even underwater settings (Historic England, 2018, pp.52–54). Virtually any material can be captured (Earl et al., 2010; Earl et al., 2011), with object sizes ranging from the microscopic (Historic England, 2018, pp.45–48) up to larger objects or even to complete sites (Historic England, 2018, pp.49–51). The samples of the RTI Systems for Ancient Documentary Artefacts project (AHRC RTISAD) include materials such as ceramic, wood, metal, stone or bone (Earl et al., 2011, pp.151) with surface fnishes ranging from matte to shiny. The diferent rendering methods provide extended tools for analysis beyond what is visible with the unaided eye or difcult to capture using traditional photographic methods, while still clearly representing 3D shape characteristics. Finally, RTI-fles provide a perfectly lit and location-independent means for the study of an object’s surface, thus providing “access to colour and texture in a way hitherto largely restricted to those in direct contact with the material culture” (Earl et al., 2010, pp.2049). For its application to Nubian-style pottery specifcally, RTI has also been used to analyse pottery that combines Nubian and Egyptian technologies at the sites of Wadi el-Hudi (Brand, 2018, pp.36–37, fg. 9–10) and at Tell Edfu (de Souza, 2020, p.316, fg. 6).Like every documentation method, besides its advantages, RTI also has disadvantages that may limit its applicability to archaeology, largely dictated by the shape, size, or location of the object to be documented.Ideally, the surface being photographed should be as fat as possible. Curved objects, for example, the interior of a vessel, can be difcult or impossible to photograph using RTI due to extensive self-shadowing. Objects with a less pronounced curvature might still be viable for RTI if the camera’s depth of feld can be adjusted accordingly, as was the case for this analysis. Curved objects or objects with multiple sides can be documented, but photographing the entire object requires multiple image stacks taken from diferent angles. 3D scanning may be a more viable option for these kinds of objects.Although the process is portable, sufcient space around the object being documented is needed. The object should be positioned in the centre of the real or virtual dome, which itself should have a radius of at least two times the diameter of the object. Therefore, particularly large objects require an accordingly large surrounding space. The viability of RTI can also be limited in confned spaces such as a tomb, a cave, or a museum storeroom. The equipment itself can also pose challenges, for example, the legs of a tripod, which can cast shadows over the object when using the H-RTI method.Ambient light and especially daylight must also be considered, as the artifcial light source should ideally be the only light source in the captured images. However, it is possible to conduct RTI outdoors in a shaded location provided that the light conditions are consistent and the exposure time and aperture are adjusted to reduce natural ambient light in the digital images.5. ResultsThe results relating to the 15 samples that yielded meaningful information are summarised in Table 1. The RTI fles and data are accessible via ARCHE (A Resource Centre for the HumanitiEs): http://hdl.handle.net/21.11115/0000-000D-FEA5-B.All but one of the samples from Site 65 displayed large fattened facets on their exterior surfaces, especially towards the base (Figures 5 and 6). Sample 65/2:1 (Figures 5a–b) also displays elongated depressions. Sample 65/0:9 does not have any obvious fattened facets at the base but does display parallel ripples running from the base to the rim (Figures 5e–f).Of the fve samples from Site 170, three specimens (Table 1; Figures 7c/e, 8a) each display clusters of small rounded dimples towards the base that have been partially diminished by the burnishing process (Figure 7d/f, 8b). The dimples are approximately 5–7 mm in diameter. The mat-impressed surface of the shallow bowl assigned to the Kerma ceramic tradition, (170/39:3, Figure 9), can be easily discerned with the unaided eye, and while RTI signifcantly enhances the visualisation of the surface texture, the weave pattern of the mat could not be easily discerned. It appears to have been tightly woven with small rounded loops, similar to the three aforementioned samples. The cultural attribution of a fourth sample from the site, 170/38:2, is uncertain, but it has been tentatively attributed to the Pan-Grave ceramic tradition based on its context (Figure 8c). This sherd does not display the clusters of dimples but rather shows parallel ripples running vertically between the base and the now-missing rim (Figure 8d).The mat-impressed surface of the large jar 266/B.1.2 (Figure 10) was visible with the unaided eye, but enhancement through the RTI process revealed a weave pattern comprising parallel rows of small circular impressions. The size of the impressions (approx. 5 mm diameter) is consistent with those observed on the samples from SJE Site 170.Sample 332/33:2 is a small bowl attributed to the Pan-Grave ceramic tradition based on its overall morphology (Figure 7a–b). This bowl displayed the same clusters of small circular dimples as those observed the examples from Site 170.Clusters of larger dimples were observed on the base of SJE 410/21:2, a small Pan-Grave style bowl (Figure 8e–f).No informative surface details were observed on the 10 samples that have been excluded in ensuing discussions
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)26Figure 5. Samples from SJE Site 65:(a) 65/2:1 photograph (b) 65/2:1 RTI in specular enhancement mode; (c) 65/107:2 photograph (d) 65/107:2 RTI in specular enhancement mode; (e) 65/0:9 photograph (f) 65/0:9 RTI in specular enhancement mode.0 10 cm0 10 cm0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)27Figure 6. Samples from SJE Site 65:(a) 65/62A:1 photograph (b) 65/62:1 RTI in specular enhancement mode; (c) 65/63:1 photograph (d) 65/63:1 RTI in specular enhancement mode; (e) 65/239:4 photograph (f) 65/239:4 RTI in specular enhancement mode.0 10 cm0 10 cm0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)28Figure 7. Samples of Pan-Grave style vessels showing possible matting impressions: (a) 332/33:2 photograph (b) 332/33:2 RTI in specular enhancement mode; (c) 170/30:1 photograph (d) 170/30:1 RTI in specular enhancement mode; (e) 170/31:1 photograph (f) 170/31:1 RTI in specular enhancement mode.0 10 cm0 10 cm0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)29Figure 8. Samples of Pan-Grave style vessels showing possible matting impressions: (a) 170/2:1 photograph (b) 170/2:1 RTI in specular enhancement mode (dimples marked by red arrows; (c) 170/38:2 photograph (d) 170/38:2 RTI in specular enhancement mode; (e) 410/21:2 photograph (f) 410/21:2 RTI in specular enhancement mode.0 10 cm0 10 cm0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)30(Table 2). In all of these cases, the surfaces of the vessels appeared entirely smooth.6. Discussion and conclusionsBased on the traces observed on the vessel surfaces, the analysed samples could be divided into two technological groups, namely paddle-forming and building on a mat, which will be discussed in detail below. These technological groups correspond very closely to the cemetery groups and, by extension, it is suggested that they correspond also to pottery-making traditions and potentially also to cultural traditions.6.1 Paddle formingThe frst technological group displays fattened facets on the vessel exterior, which were observed exclusively on the samples from SJE Site 65 (Figures 5 and 6). This type of facetting is hypothesised as being consistent with the paddle-and-anvil process, whereby a vessel is formed by beating the clay into shape using a fat implement (a “paddle”) with or without a supporting device on the interior side (an “anvil”). The clay may also be beaten over a mould (Arnold, 1993, pp.17–20; Shepard, 1954, pp.59–60). In order to confrm that these facets are products of the paddling process, RTI was applied to a modern experimental vessel produced by Georgia Kordatzaki (Figure 11). Although the resulting vessel is not Nubian in style, it presented a useful opportunity to observe and document the physical traces left on a vessel’s surface by the paddle-forming process. G. Kordatzaki’s vessel was built using two processes. Coiling was employed as the primary shaping process to build the body of the vessel. The vessel was subsequently refned by paddling as the secondary shaping process, which involved gently beating the vessel into its fnal shape from the exterior using a fat wooden tool (the “paddle”). As a fnal step, the vessel exterior was burnished with a polished stone. The RTI process clearly captured the fattened facets on the exterior of the experimental jug left by the paddling process, and which remained visible even after the burnishing process. These fattened marks were analogous to the marks observed on the vessels from SJE Site 65, strongly suggesting that they are also traces of the paddle-forming process.The analysed vessels from SJE Site 65 correspond morphologically with the C-Group ceramic tradition according to current defnitions (Säve-Söderbergh, 1989, pp.44–52, pl. 16–19), and it is therefore suggested that these vessels from this site were built using paddling as either a primary or secondary-forming process, possibly in combination with coil- or slab-building. Coil-building was likely to have been practiced by Middle Nubian potters as it was already applied in much earlier times (D’Ercole et al., 2017, pp.560–61). Thus, a two-stage forming process is highly probable. It is worth noting that the facets left by the paddling process remain visible using RTI even after the vessels were burnished, which was also evident on the experimental vessel.The parallel ripples seen on the exterior of three vessels from Site 65 are likely a result of scraping the vessel with a toothed implement to refne and thin the vessel walls. The same marks were observed on the interior of vessels from the same site, and it is possible that the scraping process would have removed traces of coiling. The ripples observed on exteriors of burnished vessels from Site 65 suggest that the scraping marks were diminished by the burnishing process to a point that they only became visible using RTI. The possibility of combining processes was raised by Nordström, who suggested that the C-Group potters combined coiling and paddling (Nordström, 1972, pp.47–48), which is the same process used for the experimental jug described above.6.2 Building on a matThe second technological group comprises pottery that displays traces of having been built on a mat-lined surface that leaves distinct impressions on the vessel exterior. The interiors of these vessels are almost invariably smooth and compacted, but not burnished. The mat-impressions on the exterior and the smooth, compacted interior surfaces strongly suggest that the wet clay mass was placed on a mat-lined surface and the pressure used to form the vessel was applied from the interior side. This type of technology appears to be absent from SJE Site 65, but was observed at Figure 9. SJE 170/39:3. (a) photograph; (b) RTI image of vessel base showing matting impressions in specular enhancement mode.0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)31Figure 10. SJE 266/1.B.2 (a) photograph; (b) RTI image in specular enhancement mode (zoom 1.5×); (c) RTI image in specular enhancement Mode (zoom 1.8×).Figure 11. Experimental jug with cutaway neck, made by Dr. G. Kordatzaki. Top: Photograph of the vessel by A. de Souza. Bottom: RTI images of base (left) and shoulder (right) in specular enhancement mode showing fattened areas resulting from the paddling process.0 10 cm0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)32all of the other sites in this study. The mat-impressions occur as a herringbone weave (Figure 4) or as rows and clusters of small rounded dimples across the vessel surface. Dense coverings of such dimples are easily discerned on sample 170/39:3 (Figure 9) and the large jar 266/1.B.2 (Figure 10), both of which can be attributed to the Kerma ceramic tradition based on their style and available parallels. In these cases, the mat-impressions have been left almost entirely unaltered, and no coating or slip has been applied to the exterior. The frequency with which mat-impressions occur indicates that it was a conscious choice by the potter and hence it can be identifed as a surface treatment in its own right.Clusters of circular impressions towards the vessel base were revealed by RTI on vessels 170/30:1 (Figure 7c–d), 170/31:1 (Figure 7e–f), 170/2:1 (Figure 8a–b), and also on 332/33:2 (Figure 7a–b), all of which can be attributed morphologically to the Pan-Grave tradition according to current defnitions. It is suggested that these marks are remnants of mat-impressions based on their resemblance to the marks observed on the Kerma-style vessels 170/39:3 and 266/1.B.2. Both of those vessels are uncoated and unburnished, but on the Pan-Grave style examples, the mat-impressions have been mostly diminished by a red slip coating and intensive burnishing. The dimples were faintly evident to the touch, but became easily visible through RTI.It is therefore suggested that the vessels in this second technological group can be further divided into two subgroups, one in which the matting impressions were deliberately left as a surface treatment in their own right, and one in which the marks were diminished through subsequent surface treatment processes, e.g., coating, burnishing. The former subgroup correlates well with the pottery assigned to the Kerma ceramic tradition, and the latter with that attributed to the Pan-Grave ceramic tradition.6.3 Chaînes opératoires and cultural heritagePercussive processes such as the paddle-and-anvil method were likely known to ancient Nubian potters. An ostracon now in Berlin has been interpreted as showing two female Nubian potters making a large jar using this process (Brunner-Traut, 1956, pp.58–9, pl. 50–51; Arnold, 1993, fg. 15A). Arnold tentatively interprets the depiction, which was presumably created by an Egyptian, as an indication that this method of making pottery may have been perceived as an unusual Nubian (i.e., not Egyptian) activity and was hence worthy of documentation, even if only informally (Arnold, 1993, pp.17–20). Whilst there are some clear and problematic assumptions about ethnicity in the interpretation of this ostracon, it nevertheless demonstrates that this vessel-forming technique was not unknown in the ancient Nile Valley. The process of beating clay into shape was also postulated by Williams (1983) in his analysis of the Nubian pottery from Adindan (Figure 12), for which he suggests that clay was pounded into shape from the inside on either the fat Figure 12. Schematic diagrams showing the process of shaping a pot by beating the clay from the inside into a depression on the ground. (After Williams, 1983, fgs. 4–6).
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)33ground or in a shallow depression, which may or may not be lined with a mat (Williams, 1983, pp.29–36, fgs. 4–6). The same process of building pottery on a mat-lined surface was observed by Reisner at modern Kerma (Reisner, 1966), where he also recorded mats with a closely-spaced rounded weave pattern from ancient Kerma burials (Reisner, 1923, pl. 69.1).Despite the small sample size in this analysis, the technological diferences observed between the samples from each of the sites point towards diferent material traditions that might, in turn, correspond with diferent cultural traditions. At least three diferent chaînes opératoires could be identifed based on the forming technologies, which are illustrated in Figure 13. The process is broken down into three manufacturing stages as defned by Roux (2016, pp.5–6), namely roughout, preform, and fnishing.The samples from SJE Site 65, attributed to the C-Group tradition and characterised by the use of the paddling technique, utilise all three of these stages. The roughout stage involves the initial forming of the vessel, most likely using coiling and/or pinching. During the preform stage, the rough form was refned by scraping to thin the walls, and then by paddling of the exterior surface. Both of those processes were done whilst the clay was still wet. When the vessel was leather hard, the fnishing processes of coating and burnishing were executed in that order.Vessels attributed to the Pan-Grave ceramic tradition seem to have followed only a two-stage process. The RTI results support the roughout being made by pressing or beating the wet clay mass into shape from the interioron a mat-lined surface. When the vessel was leather hard, it was fnished by coating and burnishing, in that order. The preform stage seems to have been omitted.Mat-impressed vessels attributed to the Kerma ceramic tradition were apparently subjected to only one stage in the vessel-forming process, namely the roughout stage. The RTI results strongly suggest that the wet clay mass was beaten into shape from the interioron a mat-lined surface. The vessels do not appear to have been further processed in any way, and in all cases, they are uncoated and unburnished.It therefore appears that the vessels attributed to the C-Group ceramic tradition are technologically distinct from those attributed to Pan-Grave and Kerma traditions, while the latter two appear to have certain features in common. The most fundamental diference is based on the methods by which the wet clay was shaped into the vessel. While the primary shaping processes employed in the C-Group tradition remain unclear, the RTI analysis strongly suggests that paddle forming was used at least as a secondary process. By contrast, the mat-impressed exteriors of pottery attributed to the Pan-Grave and Kerma traditions indicate that the clay was shaped by applying pressure from the interior. The mat-impressed wares attributed to the Kerma tradition are distinct from others in the analysis in that they are not coated or burnished and their uneven surfaces have not been treated by any preforming or fnishing processes. Nevertheless, the traces left by forming the vessels on a mat are analogous to the marks observed on vessels from the Pan-Grave tradition, but are entirely absent from the C-Group vessels in this analysis. It is possible that chronological diferences may be a factor (see chapter 3), and of course a sample of this size should not be taken as being wholly representative, but the consistency of the results suggests the possibility of fundamentally diferent technological traditions.This RTI analysis has provided evidence that the Pan-Grave and Kerma pottery traditions are technologically more closely related to one another than they are to the C-Group tradition. That being said, caution must be exercised when attempting to link this to “cultural” relatedness as our Figure 13. Châine opératoirefow-chart showing the main technological steps for each of the forming techniques identifed in the analysis.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)34understanding of ancient Nubian groups is in a state of fux. The in-depth study of material technologies, in this case by using RTI, has revealed distinct diferences between assemblages, but also showed common features that connect groups that were hitherto treated as separate cultural units. This observation lends weight to the push for an overhaul of the existing culture-historical framework for ancient Nubia, and encourages more detailed analyses of material technologies on the full range of available evidence, of which ceramics is just one aspect.AcknowledgementsThis research was conducted as part of the frst author’s InBetweenproject, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 796050. Thank you to the curatorial staf of the Museum Gustavianum, Uppsala University for their permission to work with and publish these objects. Thanks also go to Georgia Kordatzaki (experimental archaeologist & ceramic petrographer) for permission to use her experimental jug as part of this analysis (facebook.com/JasperHandmadeCeramics) and to Adam Grubner for his photographic assistance. The application of RTI would not have been possible without the materials provided by Cultural Heritage Imaging (http://culturalheritageimaging.org).ReferencesARNOLD, D., 1993. Techniques and Traditions of Manufacture in the Pottery of Ancient Egypt. In: D. Arnold and J. Bourriau, eds. An Introduction to Ancient Egyptian Pottery. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, pp. 9–137.BIETAK, M., 1966. Ausgrabungen in Sayala-Nubien 1961–1965. Denkmäler der C-Gruppe und der Pan-Gräber-Kultur, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.BIETAK, M., 1968. Studien zur Chronologie der nubischen C-Gruppe. Ein Beitrag zur Frühgeschichte Unternubiens zwischen 2200 und 1550 vor. Chr. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.BOURDIEU, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice.Trans. R. Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.BRAND, M., 2018. Early Middle Kingdom Imitation Wares at Wadi el-Hudi. Cahiers de la céramique Égyptienne, 11,29–46.BRUNNER-TRAUT, E., 1956. Die altägyptischen Scherbenbilder (Bildostraka) der deutschen Museen und Sammlungen.Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.BUDKA, B., 2017. Pottery from SAV1 North. In: J. Budka, ed. Across Borders I. The New Kingdom Town of Sai Island, Sector SAV1 North. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences, pp. 119–156.CULTURAL HERITAGE IMAGING (CHI), 2013. Guide to RTIViewer v 1.1. [online]. Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI). [25/04/2020]. Available from: http://culturalheritageimaging.org/What_We_Ofer/Downloads/rtiviewer/RTIViewer_Guide_v1_1.pdfD’ERCOLE, G., GARCEA, E.A.A., ERAMO, G., and MUNTONI, I., 2017. Variability and continuity of ceramic manufacturing of prehistoric pottery from Upper Nubia, Sudan: An ethnographic comparison. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports,16,553–563.DE SOUZA, A.M., 2019. New Horizons: The Pan-Grave ceramic tradition in context. London: Golden House.DE SOUZA, A.M., 2020. Pots, Gold, and Viceroys: Shifting dynamics of Egyptian-Nubian relations at the transition to the New Kingdom, from the viewpoint of Middle Nubian pottery at Tell Edfu,Ägypten & Levante, 30, 313–343.DE SOUZA, A.M., OWNBY, M.F., in preparation. Petrographic Analysis of Middle Nubian Pottery from the Second Nile Cataract, Sudan.EARL, G., MARTINEZ, K., MALZBENDER, T., 2010. Archaeological applications of polynomial texture mapping: analysis, conservation and representation. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(8), 2040–2050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.03.009EARL, G., BASFORD, P., BISCHOFF, A., BOWMAN, A., CROWTHER, C., DAHL, J., HODGSON, M., ISAKSEN, L., KOTOULA, E., MARTINEZ, K., PAGI, H., PIQUETTE, K.E., 2011. Refectance transformation imaging systems for ancient documentary artefacts. In: J. P. Bowen, S. Dunn, and K. Ng, eds. EVA London 2011: Electronic Visualisation and the Arts. Science Open, pp. 147–154. DOI: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2011.27EDWARD, D., 2004.The Nubian Past. London: Routledge.GOSSELAIN, O.P. 2012. Technology. In: T. Insoll, ed. Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 243–260.GOSSELAIN, O.P., 2018. Pottery chaînes opératoires as Historical Documents. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History.DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.208HISTORIC ENGLAND, 2018. Multi-light Imaging for Cultural Heritage. [online]. [25/04/2020]. Available from: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/multi-light-imaging-heritage-applications/MALZBENDER, T., GELB, D., WOLTERS, H., ZUCKERMAN, B., 2000. Enhancement of Shape Perception by Surface Refectance Transformation, Hewlett-Packard Technical Report HPL-2000-38. [online]. [25/04/2020]. Available from: http://www.academia.edu/download/49215561/Enhancement_of_Shape_Perception_by_Surfa20160929-18736-71vuyz.pdfMALZBENDER, T., GELB, D., WOLTERS, H., 2001. Polynomial texture maps. In: Proceedings of the 28thannual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques(SIGGRAPH ’01), pp. 519–528. DOI: 10.1145/383259.383320MUDGE, M., MALZBENDER, T., SCHROER, C., LUM, M., 2006. New Refection Transformation Imaging Methods for Rock Art and Multiple-Viewpoint Display. In: M. Ioannides, D. Arnold, F. Niccolucci, K. Mania, eds. VAST: International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association, pp. 195–202. DOI:10.2312/VAST/VAST06/195-202NORDSTRÖM, H-Å., 1972. Neolithic and A-Group Sites.Uppsala: Scandinavian University Books.PALMA, G., CORSINI, M., CIGNONI, P., SCOPIGNO, R., MUDGE, M., 2010. Dynamic shading enhancement for refectance transformation imaging. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 3(2), Article 6. DOI: 10.1145/1841317.1841321PIQUETTE, K.E., 2013. “It Is Written”?: Making, remaking and unmaking early “writing” in the lower Nile Valley. In: K.E. Piquette and R.D. Whitehouse, eds. Writing as Material Practice: Substance, surface and medium. London: Ubiquity Press, pp. 213–238. DOI: 10.5334/bai.kRAUE, D. 2019. Cultural Diversity of Nubia in the Later 3rd–Mid2ndMillennium BC. In: D. Raue, ed. Handbook of Ancient Nubia. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 293–334.REISNER, G.A., 1923. Excavations at Kerma. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.REISNER, G.A., 1966. Black-Topped Pottery. Journal of the American Research Centre in Egypt, 5, 7–10.ROSE, P., 2012. Early 18thDynasty Nubian Pottery from the Site of Sesebi, Sudan. In: I. Forstner-Müller and P. Rose, eds. Nubian Pottery from
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 19–35Aaron M. de Souza, Martina Trognitz: Analysis of Middle Nubian Vessel-forming Technology Using Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI)35Egyptian Cultural Contexts of the Middle and Early New Kingdom. Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Austrian Archaeological Institute at Cairo. 1–12 December 2010. Vienna: Austrian Archaeological Institute, pp. 13–29.ROUX, V., 2016. Ceramic Manufacture: The chaîne opératoire Approach. In: A. Hunt, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Ceramic Analysis.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 101–113.RUFFIEUX, P., 2012. The Pottery of Dukki Gel (2011–2012 Campaign). In: M. Honegger et al., eds.Kerma 2011–2012, Soudan. Documents de la mission archéologique Suisse au Soudan, 4, pp. 37–40.SÄVE-SÖDERBERGH, T., 1970. Introduction. In: P. Hellström (with H. Langballe): The Rock Drawings. The Scandinavian Joint Expedition to Sudanese Nubia, 1. Copenhagen: Scandinavian University Books, pp. 13–24.SÄVE-SÖDERBERGH, T., 1989. Middle Nubian Sites. Partille: Paul Åström Editions.SCHROER, C., 2014. Geeky details about the “Normals Visualization” available in the new viewer. [online] [viewed 26/04/2020]. Available from: http://forums.culturalheritageimaging.org/topic/302-geeky-details-about-the-normals-visualization-available-in-the-new-viewerSHEPARD, A.O. 1985. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. 5thed. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.TROGNITZ, M., 2016. Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI). [online] In: M. Heinrich, F. Schäfer, and M. Trognitz, eds. IT-Empfehlungen für den nachhaltigen Umgang mit digitalen Daten in den Altertumswissenschaften. [viewed 18/04/2020]. DOI: 10.13149/000.111000-aWEB CHI 2020a. Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI).[online]. Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI). [19/04/2020]. Available from: http://culturalheritageimaging.org/Technologies/RTI/index.htmlWEB CHI 2020b. RTI Capture.[online]. Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI). [25/04/2020]. Available from:http://culturalheritageimaging.org/What_We_Ofer/Downloads/Capture/index.htmlWEB CHI 2020c. Process: RTIBuilder Download.[online]. Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI). [25/04/2020]. Available from: http://culturalheritageimaging.org/What_We_Ofer/Downloads/Process/index.htmlWEB CHI 2020d. View: RTIViewer Download Version 1.1.[online]. Cultural Heritage Imaging (CHI). [25/04/2020]. Available from: http://culturalheritageimaging.org/What_We_Ofer/Downloads/View/index.htmlWEB CNR-ISTI 2020. Palma, G. WebRTIViewer.[online]. Visual Computing Laboratory at CNR-ISTI in Pisa. [18/04/2020]. Available from: http://vcg.isti.cnr.it/rti/webviewer.phpWILLIAMS, B.B., 1983. Excavations Between Abu Simbel and the Sudan Frontier. C-Group, Pan-Grave, and Kerma remains at Adindan Cemeteries T, K, U, and J. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
image/svg+xml