image/svg+xml45XII/1/2021InterdIscIplInarIa archaeologIcanatural scIences In archaeologyhomepage: http://www.iansa.euPossibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian BasinViktória Mozgai1*, Eszter Horváth2, Bernadett Bajnóczi11Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Budaörsi út 45, 1112 Budapest, Hungary2Department of Archaeometry and Archaeological Methodology, Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Múzeum körút 4/B, 1088 Budapest, Hungary1. IntroductionThe use of non-destructive and non-invasive analytical methods is widespread in the archaeometric study of metal objects, particularly in the case of precious metal artefacts, from which sampling is not allowed (or only in a very limited way) due to their high value. However, beside the advantage of their non-destructive nature, each analytical method has its own limitations as well, which have to be taken into consideration during data evaluation and interpretation (e.g., precision, accuracy, surface morphology, surface alterations, and object size). The advantages and limitations of non-destructive analytical methods are presented in this paper in connection with the detailed archaeometric study of three cast, silver, rhomboid belt buckles from the second half of the 5thcentury AD (Figure 1).This study aims to determine the elemental composition of the metal alloy and characterise the decoration techniques (gilding, niello and garnet inlays). The diferent character of these four components set diferent opportunities and limitations to the investigation. The analysis of metal alloy has signifcance primarily in the reconstruction of the organisational background of the production; i.e., in revealing the sort of preceding use and application phases, which attests the economic value of the given raw materials in the period, and on the other Volume XII ● Issue 1/2021 ● Pages 45–67*Corresponding author. E-mail: mozgai.viktoria@csfk.orgARtICLE INfoArticle history:Received: 9thSeptember 2020Accepted: 12thApril 2021DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24916/iansa.2021.1.4Key words:polychrome precious metal objectCarpathian Basingarnet provenancegildinghXRFSEM-EDXµ-XRDABStRACtThe use of non-destructive and non-invasive analytical methods is widespread in the archaeometric study of metal objects, particularly in the case of precious metal artefacts, from which sampling is not, or in a limited way, allowed due to their high value. In this study, we highlight the main advantages and limitations of non-destructive analytical methods used on three polychrome animal-style silver buckles from the mid-to-late-5th-century Carpathian Basin. Optical microscopic observations, handheld XRF, SEM-EDX and µ-XRD analyses were performed to determine the chemical composition of the metals and their decoration (gilding, garnet and niello inlays), as well as the microtexture and mineralogical composition of the niello, in order to gain a better understanding of the materials used and reconstruct the manufacturing techniques in detail. The buckles were manufactured from relatively high-quality silver derived from the re-use of gilded silver scrap metal and intentionally alloyed with brass or leaded brass. The presence of mercury indicated the use of fre gilding. The niello inlays are composed of mixed silver-copper sulphides, even reaching the composition of pure copper sulphide; this is the frst time, when copper sulphide niello is observed on a silver object. The almandine garnets most probably originate from Southern India and Sri Lanka.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin46hand, in assessing the presence of any alloying practice and standardisation.From the middle of the 5thcentury AD, silver became a more important raw material than gold. The combination of these two precious metals provided a new opportunity to enhance the polychrome efect. The use of uncoated gold material or gold plates on silver objects, typical for the Hunnic Period, was superseded by the use of (fre)gilding (Horváth et al., 2019; Mozgai et al., 2019b).In the case of niello, a black silver and/or copper sulphide inlaying material, its artifcial, recipe-like character is the key to identify the process of its making and fusing. Dissimilarities in the composition and technology may refect diferent goldsmithing traditions or even workshop practices. Since the discussed buckles have close relations with late Roman military equipment in several aspects (Böhme, 1974), determination of the mineralogical composition and microtexture of niello inlays may provide relevant new results. Analytical data are expected to prove or disprove the continuity of the late Roman niello recipes and technology.In contrast with the silver alloy and niello inlay, the garnet inlays represent a primary raw material of natural origin. During data evaluation, no chemical transformation/alteration or human intervention needs to be considered. Therefore, in the case of garnet, we could target the localisation of potential geological sources or the identifcation of their character (e.g., alluvial or mined garnet). The proportions of major, minor and trace elements, as well as the combination of special inclusions, have proved to be the fngerprint evidence for (certain/particular) garnet Figure 1. The analysed polychrome animal-style rhomboid silver buckles. A: the buckle from Zsibót-Domolospuszta (buckle ZsD) (Janus Pannonius Museum, Pécs); B: the buckle from Bácsordas (Karavukovo) (buckle B/K) (Hungarian National Museum, Budapest); C: the buckle with an unknown provenance (buckle UP) (Hungarian National Museum, Budapest). The tongues associated with the buckle with unknown provenance (buckle UP). D: tongue decorated with a bird’s head; E: tongue decorated with a bird and boar head (photos: E. Horváth).0 10 cm0 10 cm0 10 cm0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin47provenances. Corresponding archaeometric investigations are being performed worldwide, used as a reference for our new measurements (e.g., Greif, 1998; Calligaro et al., 2002; Gilg et al., 2010; Schmetzer et al., 2017; Calligaro and Périn, 2019; Pion et al., 2020; Then-Obłuska et al., 2021). These studies are performed in order to extend our knowledge about the used trade links and the organisational background of supply in the Early Middle Ages, when garnet inlaid jewellery had an unprecedented spread.2. Archaeological background and analysed artefactsThe belt buckles involved in the analysis represent one of the most emblematic metal artefacts in the middle-second half of the 5thcentury AD. Their main characteristics are the silver metal, the rhomboid shape and the decoration in polychrome animal style (Table 1; Figure 1). All of the three examples discussed here are from the Middle Danube Region (Figures 1–2). The frst one is from Zsibót-Domolospuszta Table 1.The analysed polychrome animal-style rhomboid silver buckles, their decoration techniques and the number of garnet inlays. L: length; H: height; W: width.Provenance siteAbbreviated nameSizesDecoration techniquesGarnet inlays(original/missing)Chip-carvingGildingNiello inlaysGarnet inlaysLoopTonguePlateZsibót-Domolospusztabuckle ZsDL: 15.3 cmW: 6.3 cmH: 0.5 cmXXXX–2/014/2unknown(Hungary)buckle UPL: 22.1 cmW: 7.4 cmH: 3.7 cmXXXX4/12/1–4/340/15Bácsordas (Karavukovo)buckle B/KL: 14.7 cmW: 5.9 cmH: 2.7 cmXXXX–2/110/0Figure 2. Distribution of cast silver rhomboid belt buckles with polychrome ornamentation in the Middle Danube Region (after Horváth et al., 2013). 1: Zsibót-Domolospuszta; 2: Bácsordas (Karavukovo); 3: Gáva; 4: Gyula; 5: Kiskunfélegyháza; 6: Dombóvár. Red: analysed in the present study; blue: previously analysed (Horváth et al., 2013); black: not yet analysed. Note that an additional buckle analysed in the present study (buckle UP) is from an unknown Hungarian site.0 10 cm
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin48(hereafter called: buckle ZsD; Baranya county, Hungary; Figure 1A), the second one from Bácsordas (hereafter called: buckle B/K; present-day Karavukovo, West-Bačka District, Serbia; Figure 1B), and the third one from an unknown Hungarian site (hereafter called: buckle UP; Figure 1C). Two of the buckles were unearthed as grave goods (Dombay, 1956; Csallány, 1961; Kiss, 1983), while the third one (buckle UP) is a stray fnd brought to light in the late 19thcentury (Hampel, 1905).These examples have around a dozen close analogies spread around by the Great Migrations (4th–5thcenturies AD) from the Middle Danube Region to Northern Italy and even beyond this main distribution area (Bierbauer, 1975). Only one of them, the buckle from Gáva (Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county, Hungary; Hampel 1911; Figure 2), had been investigated by archaeometric analysis (Horváth et al., 2013). Using the available data, we are focusing on this buckle as a highlighted item of comparison in our study.Besides their common material and technological traits, the polychrome animal-style buckles can be classifed by ornamentation and style. The items discussed here represent three ornamental and stylistic subgroups. Buckles in the frst subgroup (buckles from Bácsordas and Zsibót) are decorated by full-fgure representations of birds with their heads bowed down, and a round or drop-shaped garnet inlay in the middle of the front-plate (Figure 1A–B). In the second subgroup (the buckle of unknown provenance), the front-plate is framed with a bird-head frieze. In the middle of the plate, there are garnet inlays in rhomboid shape cloisonné(cellwork) (Figure 1C). The third subgroup (the buckle from Gáva) represents the so-called mask buckles (Maskenschallen) that are characterised by a mask motif and a plate closing in the shape of a wild animal’s head, fanked by two bird heads (Figure 2).These buckles were unique prestige objects of the mid-to-late 5th-century female aristocracy. They were produced and worn in a short period spanning one or two generations. These approximately ffty years represent a transition period in the history of fne metalwork in the Carpathian Basin, between the Hunnic Period (early-to-mid 5thcentury AD) rich in unique luxury objects and the Langobardic/Gepidic Period (frst two thirds of the 6thcentury AD) in which mass products were more typical. In the Hunnic Period, hammered and soldered gold objects are abundant, whereas the Langobardic/Gepidic Period can be characterised by cast, gilded silver objects (Horváth, 2013). Continuity or changes of the goldsmithing traditions and their organisational background are expected to be manifested on these objects.The studied buckles were constructed of three, separately cast elements and a hammered piece. The former, i.e., the rhomboid-shaped, highly decorated front-plate (body), the round or oval loop and the strongly profled tongue were joined to each other by hinge and hook. The fourth element, an undecorated thin back-plate, which might have served to clamp the belt, was fastened by rivets. Among the analysed objects, the back-plate was preserved only on buckle ZsD (Figure 1A). Broken remains of fastening rivets suggest that originally, similar back-plates might have been attached to the rhomboid body of the other buckles too (Figure 1B–C).The cast parts were manufactured by lost-wax casting, using wax-models (Axboe, 1984). These models were most probably prepared by applying two-part auxiliary moulds, which represented the negative version of the main design: the base form and most of the chip-carving ornamentation. The wax model itself represented the positive, i.e.identical version of the artefact (Genrich, 1977/1978). Further details, such as cavities for inlays, holes for fastening rivets and even some of the punch marks were created at this stage by modelling the wax. The casting resulted in an intermediary design of the artefact; the following post-casting process included the decorative techniques and at the end, the construction of the separately made elements.Figure 3.The diferent decoration techniques used on the buckles resulting in the polychrome efect on the example of buckle B/K: chip-carving (black arrow), gilding (yellow arrows), niello inlaying (blue arrows), garnet inlaying (red arrows) (photo: E. Horváth).
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin49The characteristic polychrome decoration appears in the colouring efects of the niello- and garnet-inlaid, gilded silver material as well as in the light-shadow efect of the chip-carved ornamentation (Figure 3; Riegl, 1927). Although both niello and garnet inlays occur on fne metalwork in a variety of periods and geographic areas, the combination of these two is a speciality, typical only for the mid-to-late 5th-century Middle Danube Region (Nagy, 2007).Buckles B and ZsD were preserved in their original (in some places incomplete) state during restoration, while the broken hinge of buckle UP was reinforced with a modern supplement (Figure 1C).Two loose tongues were supposed as potential accessories that belonged to buckle UP; one of these has an ornament in the shape of a bird’s head, while the other is decorated with a bird and boar head (Figure 1D–E). As a detailed archaeometric analysis had not been conducted before, it was unclear which of these tongues could originally belong to buckle UP. The tongue with a bird’s head has the richest niello decoration. This artefact has a unique ornamentation, as niello mass was applied irregularly on the inner surface of the tongue in addition to the pre-made (punched, carved) depressions (Figure 1C).3. MethodologyIn accordance with the artefact protection regulations, only non-destructive and non-invasive methods were allowed to be used. In addition, the size of the objects also limited the range of available methods and analytical equipment that could be used, requiring the use of either handheld equipment and/or instruments with a large sample chamber (Table 2). Furthermore, the surface and accessibility of the measurement points were not always optimal either. The polished surface of the fat garnet inlays resulted in a measurement condition similar to that of polished sections, whereas in the case of metal alloys we had to take into consideration the efect of post-burial alteration (e.g., corrosion processes). Post-burial alteration did not modify the mineralogy of the inlays (e.g., Table 2.Advantages and limitations of the analytical methods used in the present study. *after Mass and Matsen, 2013; **after Mozgai et al., 2019a.Analytical methodApplicationProsConshXRF*– chemical composition– simultaneous, multi-element method– full concentration range (Z=12–92)– major, minor, trace elements– fast– cheap– portable– non-destructive– no sampling is needed (non-invasive)– in most cases, no sample preparation is needed– surface method (upper few tens or hundreds of micrometres) (inhomogeneities in the objects due to e.g., phase segregation, corrosion, surface treatments)– geometric limitations (fat surfaces are needed)– standardisationSEM-EDX– chemical composition and microtexture– major and minor elements– elemental mapping– imaging at high magnifcations (tool marks, wear traces, etc.)– fast– cheap– small spot size (1 µm)– non-destructive– no sampling or special sample preparation are needed for conductive materials (non-invasive)– surface method (upper few micrometres) (inhomogeneities in the object and surface treatments)– geometric limitations (fat surfaces are needed)– sample chamber limits the size of the objects to be analysed– in case of non-conductive materials (e.g.garnets, glass inlays) special sample preparation is needed– standardisationµ-XRD**– mineralogical composition (phase identifcation)– fast– non-destructive– no sampling or special sample preparation is needed (non-invasive)– spot size: 10–800 µm– geometric limitations (the object/sample may cover certain areas of the detector, some higher dhklvalues cannot be detected)– the sample/object is neither single crystal, nor represent ideal powder, therefore the measured peak intensities are increased or decreased in specifc hkl crystallographic directions due to preferred orientation– during data evaluation only peak positions can be used– the smaller collimator is used, the longer measurement time is needed– sample size is limited
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin50garnet or niello), only corrosion products of the metal can deposit on their surfaces. However, during the corrosion of precious metal objects (e.g., silver alloys), the base metals (copper, lead) are leached out and silver and gold is enriched towards the surface (Hall, 1961; Lejček et al., 2010).The buckles were at frst thoroughly observed with optical microscopy to characterise the manufacturing techniques, tool marks and garnet inclusions. The chemical composition of the metal alloy and the gilding was analysed by using handheld X-ray fuorescence spectrometry. No surface cleaning was performed prior to the measurements, and we tried to analyse the least corroded parts and as fat surfaces as possible avoiding the contamination/disturbance of gilding and niello inlays. The high value of the objects meant that it was not appropriate to abrade the surface in order to expose the underlying metal over an area of about 3 mm in diameter (~10 mm2); large enough to match the XRF beam, especially on the highly decorated, clearly visible sides; therefore, the reverse, undecorated sides were measured. Each part of the buckles was analysed at 1–2 points. The hXRF is not an ideal method for analysing niello and garnet inlays. The niello inlays are too small and could not be analysed separately from the metal alloy. In addition, due to limitations of the built-in calibrations of hXRF, the exact composition of the garnet inlays could not be determined either. Therefore, SEM-EDX was used to determine the chemical composition and microtexture of the niello inlays as well as the chemical composition of the garnet inlays.As garnets are non-conductive materials, a special sample preparation was needed (Bendő et al., 2013). Garnets were frst cleaned by ethanol or acetone, after the whole object was wrapped by using aluminium foil and carbon tapes. The foil was pierced above the garnets, leaving a small “window” to be carbon coated. After the coating process, the object is unwrapped making it possible to analyse the garnet and niello inlays and the metal alloy simultaneously. As surface treatments (e.g., paraloid B-72) can highly afect the imaging, the analysed area was thoroughly cleaned with acetone or ethanol. Analyses of non-fat surfaces are even more problematic in the case of SEM-EDX than in the case of hXRF; therefore, we tried to analyse surfaces that are as fat as possible. The carbon coating was removed from the polished garnet surfaces immediately after measurements by using ethanol and gentle manual rubbing.The mineralogical composition of the niello inlays of the buckles presumed on account of the SEM-EDX results was verifed with the use of micro-X-ray difractometry.3.1 Optical microscopy (OM)Zeiss SteREO Discovery V12 and V20 modular stereo microscopes and a Zeiss AxioScope A1 upright light microscope equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam MRc5 microscope camera (5MP) were used.3.2 Handheld X-ray fuorescence spectrometry (hXRF)A SPECTRO xSORT Combi handheld X-ray fuorescence spectrometer was used. Analytical conditions: 15–50 kV, 30–120 µA, Rh anode, Peltier cooling SDD detector, “Light Elements” built-in calibration, 3 mm measurement area, 30 sec acquisition time. In the case of gilding, the built-in calibration does not calculate the mercury content; therefore, the presence of mercury can only be determined qualitatively based on the hXRF spectra.3.3 Scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDX)A ZEISS EVO 40XVP scanning electron microscope equipped with Oxford Instruments INCA ISIS energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) was used. Analytical conditions: 20 kV accelerating voltage, 6 nA beam current and 30 sec acquisition time. The results were normalised to 100 wt%. During quantitative analysis, the following built-in factory standards were used: MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, wollastonite, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, FeS2, Cu, Ag, Au, and HgTe. Each garnet was analysed with at least three (in the case of non-ideal surfaces more than three) point (spots 1 µm in diameter) and one area measurements (200 µm×200 µm). The accuracy of the garnet analyses was determined after Locock (2008). Only the “Superior” and “Excellent” results were used for interpretation. The average of the “Good” and/or “Fair” and/or “Poor” results were used in those cases where no better-quality measurements were received. The “poor-quality” data were treated separately.3.4 Micro-X-ray difractometry (µ-XRD)A RIGAKU D/MAX RAPID II micro-X-ray difractometer (μ-XRD), which is a unique combination of a MicroMax-003 third generation microfocus, sealed tube X-ray generator and a curved imaging plate detector, was used. The difractometer was operated with CuKαradiation generated at 50 kV and 0.6 mA. A collimator 100 micrometres in diameter and 20 min measurement time was used for analyses. A built-in CCD camera was used to select the measurement areas. A laser scanning readout system reads the imaging plate detector in about 1 min. RIGAKU 2D Data Processing software 2DP was used to record the difraction image from the laser readout. For each XRD pattern, the interpretable 2Θ region was selected manually. RIGAKU PDXL 1.8 integrated X-ray powder difraction software was used for data processing.4. Results4.1 Silver alloy compositionThe buckles were manufactured from high-quality silver (>80 wt%), intentionally alloyed with copper (Table 3; Figure 4). Beside the typical minor and trace elements (gold, lead, and bismuth), zinc was detected in each of the buckles.The diferent parts (front-plate, loop, tongue, and back-plate) of buckle ZsD(Figure 1A) were manufactured from diferent silver alloys. The back-plate has the highest (95.4 wt%), while the loop has the lowest silver content (87.4 wt%). The gold, lead and zinc contents also vary in the diferent parts. Buckle ZsD has the lowest zinc (0–0.6 wt%)
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin51Table 3.Elemental composition of the silver buckles and their gilding based on the hXRF measurements. The results are given in wt%. LOD: limit of detection. The presence of mercury in the gilded areas is not calculated, only qualitatively determined (+: mercury is present) – see Figure 8.DescriptionAgCuAuPbBiSnZnAu/AgBi/PbHgthe buckle from Zsibót–Domolospuszta (buckle ZsD)loop87.48.42.11.20.07< LOD0.60.0250.06–tongue90.95.91.80.90.06< LOD0.20.0200.06–back-plate95.42.91.00.40.06< LOD< LOD0.0110.15–front-plate90.65.81.51.50.06< LOD0.60.0160.04–gilding19.90.978.8< LOD< LOD< LOD0.1+the buckle with unknown provenance (buckle UP)loop82.712.90.71.60.05< LOD1.40.0090.03–front-plate87.68.31.00.90.06< LOD1.70.0110.07–tongue with bird-head87.07.31.21.60.05< LOD1.80.0130.03–tongue with bird- and boar-head81.010.31.01.6< LOD< LOD4.00.013–gilding13.91.383.9< LOD< LOD< LOD0.2+the buckle from Bácsordas (buckle B/K)front-plate91.15.70.71.20.05< LOD1.20.0080.04–loop89.95.70.72.50.04< LOD1.10.0070.02–tongue90.55.30.81.80.07< LOD1.20.0080.04–gilding14.41.483.7< LOD< LOD< LOD0.1+
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin52and highest gold content (1.0–2.1 wt%) among the buckles.The diferent parts (front-plate, loop, and tongue) of buckle B/K(Figure 1B) were manufactured from a rather similar silver alloy in terms of its silver (89.9–91.1 wt%), copper (5.3–5.7 wt%), and gold (0.7 wt%) content. This artefact has the lowest gold content among the buckles. In contrast, there is a considerable diference between its parts in terms of lead content: the loop has the highest (2.5 wt%), while the front-plate has the lowest (1.2 wt%) lead content. The zinc content is 1.1–1.2 wt%.The diferent parts (front-plate, loop and tongues) of buckle UP(Figure 1C) were manufactured from diferent low quality silver alloys (81.0–87.6 wt% Ag). The gold and lead contents of its parts difer markedly (0.7–1.2 wt% Au; 0.9–1.6 wt% Pb). This buckle has the highest zinc content among the analysed buckles (1.4–4.0 wt%). The composition of the tongue with the bird’s head is similar to that of the front-plate of the artefact, while the tongue decorated with the bird and boar heads has the lowest silver (81.0 wt%) and highest zinc (4.0 wt%) content among the objects.4.2 Niello inlaysThe buckles were extensively decorated with niello inlays. The design of the niello decoration usually shows coherency on buckles ZsB and B/K. In the case of buckle UP, the ornamentation is mostly smooth and regular on the loop and the tongue, while on the plate it is conceptually defective and deteriorated in several places.The elemental composition of the niello inlays is very heterogeneous (29.8–64.2 at% Cu), even within a single object. It is composed of diferent silver-copper sulphides with diferent Ag:Cu ratios ranging from 1:1 to pure copper sulphide (Table 4; Figure 5). The surface of the niello inlays is not even and fat, indicating that the niello inlays were not polished after application (Figure 6A–B). The microtexture of the niello shows inhomogeneities: lighter and darker phases alternate with each other in the BSE images. In the niello inlays of buckles ZsD and UP the irregular darker phases a few tens of micrometres in size are Ag-Cu sulphides or Cu-sulphides, while lighter phases are metallic silver-copper alloy (irregular shaped, a few tens of micrometres in size) or contamination with mercury and gold (narrow strings along the grain boundaries, a few micrometres in size) (Figure 6C–D). In the niello of buckle B/K the irregular darker phases a few hundreds of micrometres in size are Ag-Cu sulphides with higher copper content, while the irregular, string-like lighter phases a few tens of micrometres in size are Ag-Cu sulphides with higher silver content (Figure 6E).Figure 4.Composition of the three buckles based on the hXRF measurements. Black triangle: tongue with a bird’s head of the buckle UP, white triangle: tongue with a bird and boar heads of the buckle UP. Elemental composition of silver objects from the 5thcentury AD is depicted for comparison (unpublished data).
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin53Table 4.Elemental composition of the niello inlays based on the SEM-EDX measurements. The results are given in wt% and at%.Descriptionwt% →AgCuSAuHgat% →AgCuSAuHgthe buckle from Zsibót-Domolospuszta (buckle ZsD)front-plateniello 1sp5lighter72.113.014.870.621.67.8niello 2sp1lighter82.48.32.10.96.476.713.16.60.53.2sp2darker36.048.915.121.248.929.9niello 3sp2lighter70.76.60.821.973.311.62.912.2sp4lighter79.55.01.114.480.08.63.77.8sp5lighter78.69.71.99.973.715.45.95.0niello 4sp2lighter77.43.00.119.683.05.40.211.3sp3lighter77.87.61.812.875.012.45.96.7loopniello 4sp1lighter50.833.715.631.735.732.7sp2darker5.074.520.52.563.134.5sp3lightest68.27.923.972.114.213.6niello 5sp2darker2.576.620.91.364.234.6sp3lightest57.920.214.746.527.619.56.4sp4lighter50.734.015.331.736.132.2niello 6sp1darker13.566.619.97.058.534.6niello 7sp1darker12.968.97.21.26.962.330.50.3sp2lighter44.539.715.30.527.241.231.50.2niello 9sp2darker56.830.612.737.534.328.2sp3lighter64.718.36.210.952.925.317.14.8niello 10sp1darker21.960.817.312.056.331.7sp3lightest62.824.912.342.928.928.2sp4lighter37.345.916.821.745.432.9niello 13sp1darker3.888.87.52.184.014.0sp2lighter50.230.410.48.935.436.424.83.4sp3lighter39.731.416.612.325.534.336.04.3sp4lightest67.19.62.465.415.97.811.0niello 15sp1darkest8.871.919.34.562.433.1sp2darker29.054.616.416.452.331.3sp3lighter48.431.19.611.034.837.923.14.2tongueniello 1sp3lighter71.621.511.648.724.826.5sp4darker59.921.510.945.027.427.6sp5lighter67.525.813.343.328.128.7niello 3sp2darker70.019.310.750.423.725.9sp3lighter98.61.497.62.4sp4darker74.516.49.156.021.023.0sp5lighter95.83.30.991.75.42.9niello 5sp2lighter98.71.10.297.61.90.6sp3darker57.627.215.237.229.833.0sp4lighter97.42.10.594.83.51.7sp5darker70.518.910.651.023.225.8
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin54Descriptionwt% →AgCuSAuHgat% →AgCuSAuHgthe buckle with unknown provenance (buckle UP)front-plateniello 1sp3lighter30.452.417.217.250.232.6sp4darker21.062.916.011.658.829.7niello 2sp2darker36.846.217.021.345.533.2sp3lighter44.538.816.826.739.533.8sp1lighter60.429.89.742.035.222.8sp2darker53.432.114.634.034.731.3sp4lighter50.936.113.032.639.328.1sp5darker13.668.717.77.261.531.3sp1lighter30.051.318.716.748.434.9sp2lightest71.97.12.110.98.070.912.07.15.94.2sp3lighter41.342.216.624.542.433.1sp5lighter38.446.215.422.846.530.7sp6darker33.547.519.018.845.335.9the buckle from Bácsordas (buckle B/K)plateniello 3sp1darker27.753.818.415.350.534.2sp3lighter82.812.15.068.817.114.1sp1lighter50.336.613.232.139.728.3sp2lightest94.93.91.289.96.23.9sp4darker45.638.316.127.739.432.9niello 4sp1darker39.146.114.823.446.829.8sp2darker35.250.314.520.850.428.8sp3lighter62.926.610.543.931.524.6sp3lightest97.32.795.44.6sp4darker18.962.618.510.156.733.2sp5lighter38.749.911.423.952.323.8niello 5sp1lighter87.89.23.177.213.79.0sp2darker40.843.415.824.344.031.7sp3darkest16.369.114.78.964.127.0niello 4sp1darker39.346.414.323.747.429.0sp2lighter93.74.61.787.47.35.3sp1darker57.529.712.738.233.528.4sp2lighter80.113.66.364.418.517.0niello 6sp1lighter78.614.37.162.019.218.8sp3darker37.247.815.022.048.129.9sp1lighter93.64.42.086.76.96.4sp2darker19.162.918.010.357.332.5sp4darker29.358.612.117.358.724.0sp5lighter39.946.313.824.247.628.2Table 4.Elemental composition of the niello inlays based on the SEM-EDX measurements. The results are given in wt% and at%. (Continuation)
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin55As these pieces are mounted, it proved impossible to analyse the full range of mineral inclusions in the individual garnets. This limited access is a general problem; loose, unmounted pieces are very rarely found (Horváth and Bendő, 2011). The detected inclusions have been identifed based on their morphology. Most of these are accessory minerals (e.g., rutile needles, ilmenite plates, isometric zircon, and xenomorph quartz crystals) that are not indicators for the source rocks. From this aspect, kyanite crystals and curved needles of sillimanite, detected in a group of the slabs, are of greater importance since they indicate medium- to high-grade metamorphism at medium pressure (Figure 9A–B) (Spear, 1995). One typical combination of inclusions occurs extensively in the garnets of buckle ZsD: these are extremely fne, wavy rays of fuid inclusions accompanied by ilmenite plates (Figure 9C–D). Another specifc type of inclusion is the large, clear apatite crystals in the garnets of the tongue with the bird and boar heads, belonging to buckle UP.From among the 55 garnet inlays preserved in the settings of the buckles, 45 pieces were analysed by SEM-EDX. Based on the chemistry, the garnets used for inlays are from the pyralspite (pyrop-almandine-spessartine) series, namely almandine with varying Ca, Mg and Fe contents (Figure 10). Some garnets of buckle B/K exhibit higher Mg concentrations, often referred to as intermediate The results of the µ-XRD measurements proved the presence of stromeyerite (AgCuS), digenite (Cu9S5) and metallic silver in the niello inlays of the buckles (Figure 7A–C). The niello inlay of the tongue with bird and boar heads was studied only by using µ-XRD and revealed that the niello inlay is composed not only of stromeyerite and metallic silver, but also jalpaite (Ag3CuS4) and acanthite (Ag2S) (Figure 7D).4.3 GildingThe buckles were extensively gilded. The gold content of the gilded areas is around or above 80 wt% on each buckle based on the hXRF measurements (Table 3), indicating a rather thick gilding. The thickness of the gilding is estimated to be around several tens of micrometres based on BSE images (Figure 6F). Mercury was detected in the gilded areas by hXRF and SEM-EDX measurements as well (Figure 8).4.4 Garnet inlaysRed garnet inlays played an important role in the decoration of the buckles. Highlighting the eyes and mouth of the bird and boar fgures, they are contrasting with the colours of precious metals and niello (Figure 3). The prevailing shape of the garnet slabs is fat and round, although some triangular, rectangular, lunula- and drop-shaped pieces are also present. Figure 5. Composition of the niello inlays of the buckles based on SEM-EDX measurements. Chemical ranges for diferent silver-copper sulphides are based on Grybeck and Finney (1968) for jalpaite (Ag1.55Cu0.45S-Ag1.5Cu0.5S); Skinner et al.(1966) and Kolitsch (2010) for mckinstryite (Ag1.18Cu0.82S-Ag1.25Cu0.75S), and Frueh (1955) and Tokuhara et al.(2009) for stromeyerite (Ag0.9Cu1.1S-Ag1.0Cu1.0S), respectively.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin56Figure 6.Backscattered electron images of the niello inlays and gilding of the buckles. A–B: niello inlays were put in previously carved recesses, the surface of the niello is not fat, polished or even on buckles B/K and ZsD; C: heterogeneous niello of the loop of buckle ZsD; D: heterogeneous niello of the tongue of buckle ZsD; E: niello inlay of buckle B/K; F: rather thick gilding on the plate of buckle ZsD.pyrope-almandine crystals (Gilg et al., 2010). No ugrandite (uvarovite-grossular-andradite) series garnet was identifed on the buckles.5. Discussion5.1. Silver alloy compositionThe buckles were manufactured from relatively high-quality silver (82.7–95.4 wt% Ag), which corresponds well with the general trend that during the 5th-century AD a gradual debasement of silver alloys occurred towards the end of the century (Figure 4) (Horváth et al., 2019; Mozgai et al., 2019b). The beginning of the 5thcentury AD is characterised with high-quality silver alloys with low Au, Pb and Zn and varying Bi content similar to late Roman silver alloys (Hughes and Hall, 1979; Lang et al., 1984; Feugère, 1988; Lang, 2002; Cowell and Hook, 2010; Hook and Callewaert, 2013; Doračić et al., 2015; Lang and Hughes, 2016; Greif, 2017; Mozgai et al., 2017; Vulić et al., 2017; Mozgai et al.,
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin57Figure 7. Typical µ-XRD patterns of the niello from the buckles. A: tongue of buckle ZsD; B: loop of buckle ZsD; C: tongue with a bird’s head of buckle UP; D: tongue with a bird and boar heads of buckle UP. Abbreviations: ac = acanthite (JCPDS 14-0072); jp = jalpaite (JCPDS 12-0207); str = stromeyerite (JCPDS 75-0890); dig = digenite (JCPDS 84-1770); Ag = metallic silver (JCPDS 87-0598).
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin58Figure 8.Typical XRF spectra of the gilded areas of the buckles.Figure 9.Typical mineral inclusions in the garnets of the buckles. A: buckle B/K; B: buckle UP; C–D: buckle ZsD (photos: E. Horváth).
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin59Figure 10.Ternary plots showing the composition of the garnets from the buckles based on the cation occupancy of the X site in the garnet structure calculated from the SEM-EDX data (after Grew et al., 2013). Black triangle: tongue with a bird’s head of buckle UP, white triangle: tongue with a bird and boar heads of buckle UP.2020; Mozgai et al.2021). In contrast, lower quality silver alloys with high Cu, Pb, Zn and Sn content, reaching even the 1:1 Ag:Cu ratio (Figure 4), are more typical for the end of the 5thcentury AD (Horváth et al., 2019; Mozgai et al., 2019b).Pure silver is too soft for making silver objects of use, because they would have a tendency to sufer dents, and bend and wear easily. The most common alloying metal in silver is copper, which improves the mechanical properties of soft silver (e.g., increases strength and durability). During silver extraction, the copper content could be reduced to even 0.2–1 %; therefore, higher copper concentration indicates intentional alloying (Hughes and Hall, 1979).The measured elements other than silver and copper are naturally occurring, unintentionally or intentionally added elements, deriving from the silver ore or from the copper (bronze, brass) used for alloying (Hughes and Hall, 1979).In antiquity, the main source of silver was silver-bearing lead ores (Tylecote, 1962; Forbes, 1971). The silver ores were roasted, melted and cupelled during silver extraction. Cupellation separates silver very efciently from impurities (mainly from antimony, arsenic, tin, iron, and zinc; less well from copper, gold and bismuth). The volatile elements (antimony, arsenic, mercury, tin and zinc) disappear from molten silver during cupellation (Pernicka, 2014; L’Héritier et al., 2015). Therefore, the elevated zinc content (0.2–4.0 wt% Zn) of the buckles indicates that not pure copper, but brass was added to the silver as an alloying metal. The most important beneft of alloying is that it lowers the melting point. The more copper is added to molten silver; the more yellowish tint the alloy will have. This can be overcome by adding zinc to the alloy, which will act as a sort of “whitener” upgrading the colour (Greif, 2012). The addition of zinc also prevents molten silver from oxidation and bubbling, and enhances tarnish-proofness resulting in a much nicer polish (Greif, 2012). The addition of tin has a similar efect on colour and tarnish-proofness. Moreover, it enhances ductility making tin-enriched silver alloys more ideal for sheet production (Greif, 2012). It is uncertain whether 5th-century goldsmiths were aware of these efects and intentionally alloyed the silver with Zn (or Sn), beside copper.If silver originates from silver-bearing lead ores (galena, anglesite or cerussite), the lead content in the silver alloy ranges between 0.001% and 3% (Moorey, 1985). The lead content of cupelled silver is typically between 0.5 and 1.2 wt% (Greif, 2012). The lead content of the buckles shows generally higher concentrations (0.4–2.8 wt% Pb), indicating that leaded copper or leaded brass was used for alloying.Bismuth is a good geochemical indicator that helps identifying the provenance of silver objects, as its concentration remains relatively constant during cupellation (Pernicka and Bachmann, 1983; Pernicka, 2014; L’Héritier et al., 2015). Based on experiments, bismuth is oxidised only in the very last stages of cupellation and, therefore, bismuth in silver objects is correlated with the degree of cupellation. However, the fnal Bi/Pb ratio of the cupelled silver depends on the initial Bi content of the silver-bearing lead ores (L’Héritier et al., 2015). The Bi/Pb ratio of the buckles is rather low and consistent, except the back-plate of buckle ZsD (Figure 4), which is typical for the silver alloys from the middle and end of the 5thcentury AD (Horváth et al., 2019; Mozgai et al., 2019b), in contrast with silver alloys from the beginning of the 5thcentury AD and from late Roman times. The latter usually have more varied Bi/Pb ratios, indicating the use of silver from diferent ore sources (Cowell and Hook, 2010; Doračić et al., 2015; Greif, 2017; Mozgai et al., 2017; Vulić et al., 2017; Mozgai et al., 2020; Mozgai et al.2021). The more constant Bi/Pb ratio in silver objects from the middle and end of the
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin60Table 5. Chemical composition of the garnet inlays based on the SEM-EDX measurements. The results are given in wt%. The accuracy of the garnet analyses was determined after Locock (2008). Only the “Superior” and “Excellent” results were used and their average and std. deviation were calculated. The average and std. deviation of the “Good” and/or “Fair” and/or “Poor” results were used in those cases where no better-quality data were received. No.: number of analyses used to calculate the average and std. deviation values after Locock (2008).DescriptionNo.SiO2Al2O3MgOCaOMnOFeOthe buckle from Zsibót-Domolospuszta (buckle ZsD)front-plategrt 1334.5±0.318.0±0.23.6±0.13.7±0.20.4±0.331.5±1.4grt 2132.717.33.32.01.031.4grt 3238.620.64.83.134.7grt 4436.6±3.019.0±1.74.2±0.51.9±0.434.0±2.3grt 5536.2±1.719.2±1.06.7±0.52.9±0.30.5±0.327.3±1.2grt 6147.925.95.82.20.443.4grt 7342.0±1.122.1±0.53.9±0.22.6±0.22.1±0.438.3±0.7grt 8446.5±1.524.3±0.94.2±0.42.8±0.34.2±0.641.1±1.5grt 10140.822.05.42.30.137.8grt 11446.2±1.325.1±0.46.9±0.31.3±0.33.5±0.334.4±0.5grt 12241.822.37.83.30.531.4tonguegrt 1235.319.63.12.41.633.2grt 2139.621.34.41.40.532.9the buckle with unknown provenance (buckle UP)front-plategrt 1138.915.86.40.540.2grt 2438.0±0.319.4±0.25.8±0.11.6±0.11.8±0.433.5±0.7grt 3135.817.95.31.62.137.4grt 4140.020.47.81.00.629.9grt 5137.220.95.41.42.032.9grt 6439.7±0.521.0±0.96.7±0.41.2±0.51.2±0.230.1±0.6grt 7138.017.96.51.31.234.9grt 8139.020.47.51.60.331.5grt 9340.3±1.019.1±2.88.5±0.70.9±0.831.0±2.9grt 10238.520.27.21.60.831.7grt 11140.520.86.91.00.330.3grt 12840.1±0.520.8±0.86.3±0.31.3±0.21.7±0.329.7±0.7grt 13139.718.811.032.1grt 14138.921.66.41.42.329.3grt 15138.021.16.11.63.329.7grt 17438.1±0.819.8±1.06.6±1.11.8±0.51.2±0.132.6±2.5grt 19437.8±0.320.0±0.36.0±0.21.5±0.21.1±0.233.3±0.3grt 20238.820.38.11.631.4grt 21140.021.56.81.41.229.5grt 22337.2±0.519.5±0.25.2±0.22.8±0.235.4±0.1grt 23337.6±0.519.9±0.46.5±0.21.5±0.21.2±0.233.3±0.4
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin61DescriptionNo.SiO2Al2O3MgOCaOMnOFeOtongue with bird- and boar-headgrt 1140.621.08.74.50.824.6tongue with bird-headgrt 1139.121.36.81.41.030.7the buckle from Bácsordas (buckle B/K)front-plategrt 2438.1±0.620.1±0.26.4±0.20.8±0.21.3±0.233.1±0.7grt 3342.5±0.222.6±0.416.3±0.20.5±0.010.2±0.118.0±0.2grt 4140.821.412.33.30.321.7grt 5340.8±0.221.5±0.110.5±0.42.3±0.20.5±0.0324.2±0.4grt 6237.719.95.91.30.734.6grt 7240.021.07.61.329.9grt 8138.420.76.01.61.531.6grt 9241.121.711.32.10.523.2grt 10437.9±0.620.0±0.76.6±0.30.8±0.10.8±0.233.6±0.8Table 5. Chemical composition of the garnet inlays based on the SEM-EDX measurements. The results are given in wt%. The accuracy of the garnet analyses was determined after Locock (2008). Only the “Superior” and “Excellent” results were used and their average and std. deviation were calculated. The average and std. deviation of the “Good” and/or “Fair” and/or “Poor” results were used in those cases where no better-quality data were received. No.: number of analyses used to calculate the average and std. deviation values after Locock (2008). (Continuation)5thcentury AD may be the result of gradual recycling and mixing of diferent silver alloys, and therefore, in our case, the Bi/Pb ratio is not indicative of provenance.Gold is completely miscible with silver. During metallurgical processes, the gold content of the silver does not change radically (L’Héritier et al., 2015), and as a consequence, the Au/Ag ratio remains constant during cupellation (Pernicka, 2014). The buckles show elevated concentrations of gold (0.7–2.1 wt% Au), and, as a result, elevated Au/Ag ratios (Figure 4). Various interpretations are possible for higher gold concentrations, e.g., remnants of former gilding, the re-use of scrap gilded silver, or the use of gold-silver ores. In the case of buckles, as recycling was proven by other elements as well, it is safe to say that most probably re-used scrap gilded silver was utilised for manufacturing.The polychrome animal-style silver buckle from Gáva, previously analysed by Horváth et al.(2013), exhibits slightly lower silver (81.5–82.5 wt%) and higher lead content (1.9–2.8 wt%) than the three buckles discussed in this study. The gold content is, however, similar (0.8–1.0 wt%). The main diference is that beside zinc (1.9–2.5 wt%), elevated tin content (5.5–5.8 wt%) was also detected in the buckle from Gáva, indicating the use of leaded bronze or gunmetal for alloying.The diferences in the elemental composition of the silver alloys indicate the use of diferent silver alloys in manufacture. The shortage of raw materials towards the end of the 5thcentury AD resulted in the re-use and recycling of more diverse materials. Furthermore, the diferences in alloy compositions, even within one single object, indicate that there was no conscious or standardised alloying practice adopted by 5th-century AD goldsmiths.The only undecorated back-plate that was analysed in the study, used for fastening the strap/belt, belongs to buckle ZsD. Its composition difers completely from the other parts of the buckle and shows similarities to late Roman silver alloys (high silver content, relatively low gold, lead and copper content, and no zinc) (Figure 4). It may have been manufactured by melting Roman silver objects directly, without further alloying.5.2 Niello inlaysThe bluish-black niello has been widely used to decorate silver, gold and copper-based alloy objects. Chemically, niello is composed of the sulphide of one or more metals, fused or inlaid into a recess carved into the metal surface. The composition of niello changed over the course of time depending on what type of metal it decorated (Rosenberg, 1908; Moss, 1953; Dennis, 1979; Newman et al., 1982; La Niece, 1983; Oddy et al., 1983; Schweizer, 1993; Northover and La Niece, 2009).Niello technique was much used in the early Middle Ages, but there are still uncertainties concerning the niello technique (exact composition, preparation and application) used in this particular period. It has been widely accepted that during the Roman period niello was generally composed
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin62of the sulphide of only one metal, namely the same as the metal it decorates: silver sulphide (acanthite Ag2S) for silver objects and mixtures of copper sulphides (chalcocite Cu2S, digenite Cu9S5and covellite CuS) for copper-based alloy objects. Intentional use of binary silver-copper sulphide niello (stromeyerite AgCuS) is assumed to have started only at the end of the 5thcentury AD (Moss, 1953; Dennis, 1979; Newman et al., 1982; La Niece, 1983; Oddy et al., 1983; Schweizer, 1993; Northover and La Niece, 2009). Recent studies have proved that silver-copper sulphide niello (reaching the composition of stromeyerite) was already being used in Roman times (Mozgai et al., 2019c).The studied buckles were decorated with silver-copper sulphides of various Cu content (29.8–64.2 wt%), and the µ-XRD measurements proved the presence of stromeyerite (AgCuS), digenite (Cu9S5) and metallic silver. The niello inlays of the buckle from Gáva are also silver-copper sulphides with sporadically detected lead and tin contents, which was interpreted as niello prepared from debased silver (Horváth et al., 2013). Previous studies on niello-inlaid objects from the 5thcentury AD proved the presence of mixed silver-copper sulphides (La Niece, 1983; Craddock et al., 2010; Horváth et al., 2013), but niello inlays with very high copper content on silver objects, reaching even the composition of pure copper sulphide, has not yet been described.The use of silver-copper sulphide niello by the craftsmen can be threefold (Mozgai et al., 2019c): (i) unintentional use, when the goldsmith was not aware of the copper content of the silver alloy used for the preparation of the niello; (ii) intentional use, when the silversmith was aware of the variable copper content of the silver alloy available to him, but did not care; and (iii) technological innovation, when the silversmith intentionally prepared a starting silver-copper alloy using a recipe to gain either technological or economic benefts.The short supply of metals in the period could have led to a wider use of cheaper materials and also to a more frequent re-use of scrap metals. As there are no serious diferences either in the preparation, or in the application of the diferent niello types, the fnal products, the diferent silver-copper sulphides look exactly the same. The craftsman clearly felt no need to distinguish between them and he did not bother to refne recycled materials: he just used them.The presence of metallic silver in the niello inlays can be interpreted as not all the silver metal reacted with sulphur during preparation or the niello decomposed at elevated temperatures, as silver-copper sulphides start to decompose to elemental silver in an oxidising atmosphere before reaching their melting point (~680–860 °C) (Skinner, 1966; Allan, 1979; La Niece, 1983; Stemann-Petersen, 1995; 2003; Živković et al., 2013).Previous studies on objects decorated with silver-copper sulphide niello from the early medieval ages (5th–10thcentury) were interpreted as their niello not being applied in molten form (La Niece, 1983; Stemann-Petersen, 1995; 2003). Silver-copper sulphides are malleable at room temperature, and even more when heated; experiments proved that it is possible to inlay niello in solid form, softening them a little by heating to be compacted (La Niece, 1983; Stemann-Petersen, 1995; 2003). There are two usual methods described in the literature for the application of silver-copper sulphide niello in solid form: either in powder form or as compact strips. In the case of the powder form the craftsman has to grind up the niello, fll the engraved cavities with the black powder, and after that heat the silver over a fame and rub the powder with a burnisher repeatedly to fx it in place and to reach a compact polishable surface (Moss, 1953; Dennis, 1979; Newman et al., 1982; Oddy et al., 1983; La Niece, 1983; Schweizer, 1993). Even early descriptions report the difculties of grinding niello as it is not brittle enough. Recent experiments confrm these observations (Stemann-Petersen, 1995; 2003). Furthermore, rubbing heated niello particles into the recesses during experiments was difcult to control: the powder did not become completely compacted together and did not leave a homogeneous sulphide inlay (Stemann-Petersen, 1995; 2003). This can be the reason why the niello inlays of the buckles do not look even and compact enough.The patches of mercury and gold on the surface of the niello inlays are the remnants of gilding, during which mercury or gold amalgam spread over the surface of the niello, as well as reacting with the material of the niello forming silver amalgam.5.3 GildingThe buckles were extensively gilded with a relatively thick gold layer. Mercury was detected in the gilding of the buckles indicating the use of fre gilding. Previous studies on objects from the 5thcentury AD have also proved the use of fre gilding (Craddock et al., 2010; Horváth, 2013). The buckle from Gáva was also decorated with this type of gilding (Horváth et al., 2013).Fire gilding was most probably invented in China in the 4thcentury BC (Lechtman, 1971; Lins and Oddy, 1975; Oddy, 1981; 1988; 1991; 1993; 2000). Gold was dissolved in hot mercury and the resulting gold amalgam was rubbed on to the cleaned metal surface, after the object was heated for a few minutes at 250–300 °C (below the boiling point of mercury, 357 °C) until it turns from grey to yellow. It is important to avoid any overheating of the object: if silver is overheated, the gold will discolour or even disappear into the substrate. This phenomenon restricts the maximum fring temperatures to approx. 350 °C. Given this proviso, a frmly bonded, but porous, matte gilded layer will form, which then needs to be burnished. This technique is still used in Nepal (Oddy, 2000; Anheuser, 1997). In the Roman world, fre gilding is mentioned as a rare and costly method by Pliny in the 1stcentury AD, but became the standard method of gilding in the 3rd–4thcenturies AD and continued in use throughout the Migration Period and medieval Europe until the invention of electroplating in the mid-19thcentury (Lechtman, 1971; Lins and Oddy, 1975; Oddy, 1981; 1988; 1991; 1993; 2000). Another method of fre gilding is to apply a layer of mercury
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin63to the metal surface to be gilded and then lay pieces of gold leaf on top. The gold leaf dissolves in mercury creating a gold amalgam in situ, after which the object is heated and burnished. This method is still used in Japan (Oddy, 2000; Anheuser, 1997). During fre gilding, 8–25 % of mercury is retained – and thus can be later detected (Anheuser, 1997).Fire gilding superseded gold-plating during the second half of the 5thcentury AD (Mozgai et al., 2019b; Horváth et al., 2019). This can be interpreted as less gold is needed for fre gilding and given the shortage of raw materials, or alternatively, fre gilding is a more complicated and sophisticated gilding method indicating the development of goldsmithing skills during the 5thcentury AD.5.4 Garnet inlaysMetalwork objects with red gemstones, identifed mostly as garnets, were widespread during the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Medieval times (Arrhenius, 1985; Adams, 2011). In the archaeological material of the Carpathian Basin, garnet inlay decoration was a characteristic feature over around three centuries, from the Hunnic Period through the age of the Gepidic and Langobardic Kingdoms until the Avar Period (Horváth, 2013). Provenance studies of the tiny garnet inlays have come into focus since the end of the last century. Thousands of analyses and many feld trips in present-day, or at one-time, mine districts facilitated their increasingly detailed geochemical characterisation (recently: Schmetzer et al., 2017; Calligaro and Périn, 2019; Then-Obłuska et al., 2021). The identifcation and comparison of (mineral and fuid) inclusions and chemical compositions (major, minor and trace elements) with similar datasets of recent geological samples has proved to be the key to the localisation of potential geological sources.The garnets in the buckles are almandine, and on rare occasions intermediate pyrope-almandine, from the pyralspite series. The chemical composition of the garnet slabs was compared to the chemical composition of garnets from those deposits which were certainly known and used in the Migration Period, as attested by the analyses of other contemporaneous objects. The chemical composition and the characteristic inclusion assemblages revealed that European deposits can be excluded as possible sources (Figure 11). Our data are classifed into two sets: to one of the clusters (Cluster A) and to a heterogeneous group (Group X) requiring further division (Gilg et al., 2010). The inlays on the buckles B/K and UP are mainly Cluster A garnets and only a few garnets belong to Group X. Contrarily, the inlays on buckle ZsD are mainly Group X garnets and only a few Cluster A garnets are present (Figure 11). The garnet inlays on the buckle from Gáva belong to both Cluster A and Group X (Horváth et al., 2013).Cluster A garnets, generally comprised of chromium-bearing almandines originating most probably from Southern India (Greif, 1998; Calligaro et al., 2008; Gilg et al., 2010; 2018), are the earliest ones in use in the Migration Period Carpathian Basin, applied from the beginning of the Hunnic Period (Horváth et al., 2019). Group X garnets, almandines with a higher magnesium content, originate from the placer Figure 11.CaO-MgO plot showing the composition of the garnets based on the SEM-EDX measurements. The classifcation of possible provenances is based on Greif (1998), Quast and Schüssler (2000), Mannerstrand and Lundqvist (2003), Calligaro et al.(2008), Gilg et al.(2010; 2018). The grey area represents garnets with variable chemical and gemmological characteristics that derive from various, unknown deposits and cover possible new clusters: blue circle: Sri Lanka (Ratnapura?); yellow circle: Sri Lanka (Elahera?) (Calligaro and Périn, 2019); red circle: new cluster? Poor quality measurements: based on Locock (2008). Black triangle: tongue with a bird’s head of buckle UP, white triangle: tongue with a bird and boar heads of buckle UP.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin64deposits of Sri Lanka (Greif, 1998; Calligaro et al., 2008, Gilg et al., 2010; 2018). These are very diverse chemically, suggesting that a number of primary sources may be involved, and the group comprises, most probably, several clusters (Gilg et al., 2010). Recent studies have further classifed Group X based on the chemical composition and mineral inclusions of the garnets (Périn and Calligaro, 2016; Calligaro and Périn, 2019; Gilg et al., 2019; Horváth et al., in preparation). Based on the chemistry, garnets from Ratnapura (Sri Lanka) and Elahera (Sri Lanka) deposits might be such potential sources (Calligaro and Périn, 2019). Further investigations are in progress on the mineral inclusions of the garnets of these two deposits and further potential source materials (Gilg, personal communication). Most of the garnets from buckle ZsD may originate from a third cluster based on the chemical composition and especially on the characteristic mineral inclusions (Figure 9C–D; Figure 11), but investigations on geological samples are required to prove this hypothesis. Prospective measurements of the trace elements and mineral inclusions in the future may confrm the classifcation presented here based on the major and minor element compositions.Group X and Cluster A garnets were predominant all over Europe during the 5thcentury AD. As Sri Lanka and Southern India are close to each other geographically, most probably their garnets were transported via common long-distance maritime trade routes (Roth, 1980). No Cluster B garnets, originating from Northern India, were observed on the buckles. Northern Indian garnets became commonly used only from the beginning of the 6thcentury AD (Gilg et al., 2010).6. ConclusionThree polychrome animal style silver buckles, dated to the second half of the 5thcentury AD, were analysed in order to determine the elemental composition of their metal alloys and to explore techniques of their manufacture and decoration (gilding, niello and garnet inlays). Non-destructive and non-invasive analytical methods, such as handheld XRF, SEM-EDX and µ-XRD, were successfully used, while their limitations – such as using a special preparation technique needed for the SEM-EDX analysis of mounted garnets; in situmicrotextural and mineralogical analysis of the niello inlays, and geometric and calibration limitations – were also kept in mind.The buckles were manufactured from high-quality silver, but a gradual decrease in the silver quality is evident towards the end of the 5thcentury AD. The elevated lead and zinc contents indicate that silver was intentionally alloyed with brass and leaded brass instead of pure copper. The diferent parts of the buckles have diferent chemical compositions, suggesting the use of diferent silver alloys. The elevated gold content implies the re-use/recycling of gilded silver scrap metal. Re-use/recycling was made necessary by the shortage of raw material caused mainly by the decrease of primary mining.Each buckle is richly decorated by chip-carving, gilding, niello and garnet inlaying. The presence of mercury indicates the use of fre gilding. The niello inlays of the buckles are composed of mixed silver-copper sulphides with relatively high copper contents, even reaching the composition of pure copper sulphide. Copper sulphide niello on a silver object has not yet been reported before. The presence of metallic silver in the niello, the lack of fnal polishing, and the unevenness of the niello’s surface suggest that it was made by an unskilled craftsman. Based on their chemistry and mineral inclusions, the almandine garnets of the buckles most probably derive from Southern India and Sri Lanka.It is unequivocal from the similarity of the elemental composition of its silver alloy and garnet inlays to the other parts of the buckle that the tongue with bird’s head belonged to buckle UP originally. The tongue with bird and boar heads could have been the accessory of another buckle.The buckles could not be related to the work of a single goldsmith, or workshop; it is much more likely that these are products from workshops that operated in the same region and followed, more or less, similar practices. The localisation of the workshops remains an open question, but the late Roman metalwork in the provinces along the limes must have had an impact. Based on the prevalence of the fnds and the currently available research results, one can hypothetically localise the workshops near the centres of barbaric power (Germanic tribal kingdoms) in the former Roman provinces, although a more precise identifcation yet remains to be done in the light of further evidence.AcknowledgementsThe research was supported by the Hungarian Scientifc Research Fund granted to Eszter Horváth (OTKA/NKFIH-PD109234). The authors are thankful for their help to Mária Tóth (IGGR RCAES ELRN), Máté Szabó (IGGR RCAES ELRN), Péter Németh (IMEC RCNS ELRN), Zsuzsanna Hajnal ((Hungarian National Museum, Budapest), Gergely Kovaliczky (Janus Pannonius Museum, Pécs) and Marianna Dági (Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest).ReferencesADAMS, N., 2011. The Garnet Millennium: The Role of Seal Stones in Garnet Studies. In: Ch. Entwistle and N. Adams, eds. “Gems of Heaven”: Recent Research on Engraved Gemstones in Late Antiquity c. AD 200–600.British Museum Research Publication, 177. London: Trustees of the British Museum, pp. 10–24.ALLAN, J. W., 1979. Persian Metal technology 700–1300 AD. London: Ithaca Press.ANHEUSER, K., 1997. The Practice and Characterization of Historic Fire Gilding Techniques. the Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 49, 58–62.ARRHENIUS, B., 1985. Merovingian Garnet Jewellery. Emergence and Social Implications. Stockholm: Kungliga Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, Almqvist & Wiksell International.AXBOE, M., 1984. Positive and Negative Versions in the Making of Chip-carving Ornament. Universitetets oldsaksamlings Skrifter, 5, 31–42.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin65BENDő, ZS., OLáH, I., PéTERDI, B., SZAKMáNy, Gy., HORVáTH, E., 2013. Csiszolt kőeszközök és ékkövek roncsolásmentes SEM-EDX vizsgálata: lehetőségek és korlátok. Non-destructive SEM-EDX analytical method for polished stone tools and gems: opportunities and limitations. Archeometriai Műhely, 10(1), 51–61.BIERBRAUER, V., 1975. Die ostgotischen Grab- und Schatzfunde in Italien. Biblioteca degli Studi medievali, 7. Spoleto: Fondazione CISAM.BöHME, H. W.,1974. Germanische Grabfunde des 4. und 5. Jahrhunderts zwischen unterer Elbe und Loire. Studien zur Chronologie und Bevölkerungsgeschichte. Münchner Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte, 19. München: Beck.CALLIGARO, T., COLINART, S., POIROT, J.-P., SUDRES, C., 2002.Combined external-beam PIXE and µ-Raman characterisation of garnets used in Merovingian jewellery. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B – Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 189, 320–327.CALLIGARO, T., PéRIN, P., VALLET, F., POIROT, J.-P., 2008. Contribution à l’étude des grenats mérovingiens (Basilique de Saint-Denis et autres collections du musée d’Archéologie nationale, diverses collections publiques et objects fouilles récentes). Antiquités Nationales, 38(2006–2007), 111–144.CALLIGARO, T., PéRIN, P., 2019.Le commerce des grenats à l’époque mérovingienne. Archéopages, 5. Les archéologues face à l’économie, 109–120.COWELL, M., HOOK, D., 2010. The analysis of the metal artefacts. In: C. Johns, ed. the Hoxne Late Roman Silver treasure: gold jewellery and silver plate.London: British Museum Press, pp. 175–183.CRADDOCK, P., COWELL, M., HOOK, D., HUGHES, M., LA NIECE, S., MEEKS, N.,2010. Change and stasis: the technology of Dark Age metalwork from the Carpathian Basin. the British Museum technical Research Bulletin, 4, 55–65.CSALLáNy, D., 1961. Archäologische Denkmäler der Gepiden in Mitteldonaubecken. Archaeologia Hungarica, 38, Budapest: Hungarian National Museum.DENNIS, J. R., 1979.Niello: a technological study. In: Papers presented by trainees at the Art Conservation training programs conference. Manchester, Massachusetts: The Cricket Press, pp. 83–95.DOMBAy, J., 1956. Die gotische Grabfund von Domolospuszta. A Janus Pannonius Múzeum Évkönyve,1956(1), 104–131.DORAčIć, D., LANG, J., FLETCHER, P., 2015. Late Roman silver hoard from Vinkovci, Croatia – a preliminary technological overview. Historical Metallurgy, 49(2), 87–95.FEUGèRE, M., 1988.Le trésor d’argenterie gallo-romaine de Thil (Haute-Garonne) dit « Trésor de Caubiac. In: F. Baratte and N. Duval, eds. Argenterie romaine et byzantine: actes de la table ronde, Paris 11–13 octobre 1983 Archéologie de l’antiquité tardive. Paris: De Boccard, pp. 63–80.FORBES, R. J.,1971. Studies in Ancient technology. Volume VIII. – Metallurgy in Antiquity Part 1: Early metallurgy; the smith and his tools; gold, silver and lead, zinc and brass. Leiden: Brill Ltd.FRUEH, A. J., 1955. The Crystal Structure of Stromeyerite, AgCuS: A Possible Defect Structure. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie,106, 299–307.GENRICH, A., 1977/1978. Zur Herstellungstechnik kerbschnittverzierter Schmuckstücke der Völkerwanderungszeit aus Niedersachen. Kunde (Neue folge), 28/29, 105–110.GILG, H. A., GAST, N., CALLIGARO, T., 2010.Vom Karfunkelstein. In: L. Wamser, ed. Karfunkelstein und Seide. Neue Schätze aus Bayerns frühzeit.Ausstellungskataloge der Archäologischen Staatssammlung, 37. München: F. Pustet, pp. 87–100.GILG, H. A., SCHMETZER, K., SCHüSSLER, U., 2018. An Early Byzantine Engraved Almandine from the Garibpet Deposit, Telangana State, India: Evidence for Garnet Trade along the Ancient Maritime Silk Road. Gems & Gemology, 54(2), 149–165.GILG, H. A., SCHüSSLER, U., KRAUSE. J., SCHULZ, B.,2019. The use of phosphate inclusions in origin determination of ancient and medieval garnets. In: 36thInternational Gemmological Conference – Book of Abstracts, Nantes, pp. 41–43.GREIFF, S., 1998. Naturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zur Frage der Rohstein-quellen für frümittelalterlichen Almandingranatschmuck rheinfrankischer Provenienz. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuesum,45(2), 599–646.GREIFF, S., 2012. Silver Grave Goods from Early Hungarian Contexts: Technological Implications of Debased Alloy Compositions with Zinc, Tin and Lead. In: B. Tobias, ed. Die Archäologie der frühen Ungarn Chronologie, technologie und Methodik. Internationaler Workshop des Archäologischen Instituts der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz in Budapest am 4. und 5. Dezember 2009.RGZM – Tagungen Band, 17, Mainz: Forschungsinstitut für Archäologie Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, pp. 241–260.GREIFF, S.,2017. Chemisch-analytische Untersuchungen der Trierer Silberkanne. In: A. Kaufmann-Heinimann and M. Martin, eds. Die Apostelkanne und das tafelsilber im Hortfund von 1628. trierer Silberschätze des 5. Jahrhunderts.Trier: Rheinisches Landesmuseum, pp. 158–170.GREW, E. S., LOCOCK, A. J., MILLS, S. J., GALUSKINA, I. O., GALUSKIN, E. V., HåLENIUS, U.,2013. IMA Report: Nomenclature of the garnet supergroup. American Mineralogist, 98, 785–811.GRyBECK, D., FINNEy, J. J., 1968. New occurrences and data for jalpaite. the American Mineralogist, 53, 1530–1542.HALL, E. T.,1961. Surface enrichment of buried metals. Archaeometry,4, 62–66.HAMPEL, J., 1905.Alterthümer des frühen Mittelalters in Ungarn I–III.Braunschweig: F. Vieweg und Sohn.HAMPEL, J., 1911. A gávai sírlelet. Archaeologiai Értesítő, 31, 135–147.HOOK, D., CALLEWAERT, M.,2013. Appendix 2: The scientifc examination and analysis of some of the Roman silver artefacts from the Coleraine treasure. In: F. Hunter and K. Painter, eds. Late Roman Silver: the traprain treasure in Context.Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, pp. 184–187.HORVáTH, E., 2013. Gemstone and glass inlaid fne metalwork from the Carpathian Basin: the Hunnic and Early Merovingian Periods. Dissertationes Archaeologicae ex Instituto Archaeologico Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae, 3(1), 275–302.HORVáTH, E., BENDő, ZS., 2011.Provenance study on a collection of loose garnet from a Gepidic period grave in Northeast Hungary. Archeometriai Műhely, 8(1), 17–32.HORVáTH, E., BENDő, ZS., MAy, Z., 2013. One hundred year later. Characteristics of materials technology and workshop afnities of the polychrome metalwork from Gáva (North-East Hungary). In: M. Hardt and O. Heinrich-Tamáska, eds. Macht des Goldes, Gold der Macht. Herrschafts- und Jenseitsrepräsentationen zwischen Antike und frühmittelalter im mittleren Donauraum. Weinstadt: Forschungen zu Spätantike und Mittelalter, 2, pp. 251–280.HORVáTH, E., MOZGAI, V., TOPA, B., SZABó, M., BAJNóCZI, B., 2019. Fine metalwork between two periods: tracing changes in goldsmithing tradition and craft organisation in the mid-to-late 5thcentury Carpathian Basin by the investigation of polychrome goldsmiths’ works. In: 5thInternational Conference Archaeometallurgy in Europe 2019 – Book of Abstracts. Miskolc, p. 23.HORVáTH, E., BENDő, ZS., VáCZI, T.,in preparation. Avar Period Garnet Jewellery from the Carpathian Basin – the Case of the Garnet Raw Material. In: S. Greif, A. Hilgner andD. Quast, eds. Universal Framework – Changes in the cultural signifcance of early medieval gemstone jewellery considered against the background of economic history and the transfer of ideas and technologies.HUGHES, M. J., HALL, J. A., 1979. X-ray fuorescence analysis of Late Roman and Sassanian silver plate. Journal of Archaeological Science, 6, 321–344.KISS, A., 1983.Die Skiren im Karpatenbecken, ihre Wohnsitze und ihre materielle Hinterlassenschaft. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae,35, 95–131.KOLITSCH, U.,2010. The crystal structure and compositional range of mckinstryite. Mineralogical Magazine,74(1), 73–84.LANG, J.,2002. Le Trésor de Carthage. étude technique. In: F. Baratte, J. Lang, S. La Niece and C. Metzger, eds. Le trésor de Carthage: contribution à l’étude de l’orfévrerie de l’antiquité tardive. Paris: CNRS éditions, pp. 89–105.LANG, J., HUGHES, M.,2016. The Mildenhall Treasure: Technical Aspects of Construction and Decoration. In: R. Hobbs, ed. the Mildenhall treasure: Late Roman Silver Plate from East Anglia. London: British
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin66Museum Press, pp. 240–249.LANG, J. HUGHES, M.J., ODDy, W.A., 1984. Report on the Scientifc Examination of the Sea City Dish 62, the Achilles Dish 63 and some other Items. In: H.A. Cahn and A. Kaufmann-Heinimann, eds. Der spätrömische Silberschatz von Kaiseraugst. Derendingen: Basler Beiträge zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte, 19, pp. 375–381.LA NIECE, S.,1983. Niello: an historical and technical survey. the Antiquaries Journal, 58(2), 279–297.LECHTMAN, H. N.,1971. Ancient Methods of Gilding Silver: Examples from the Old and the New Worlds. In: R. H. Brill, ed. Science and Archaeology, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 2–30.LEJčEK, P., KOVAč, J., VANíčKOVá, J., DěD, J., SAMARDŽIJA, Z., ZALAR, A.,2010. Copper surface enrichment of Ag-Cu alloys. Surface and Interface Analysis, 42, 662–665.L’HéRITIER, M., BARON, S., CASSAyRE, L., TéREyGEOL, F.,2015. Bismuth behaviour during ancient processes of silver-lead production. Journal of Archaeological Science,57, 56–68.LINS, P. A., ODDy, W. A., 1975. The Origins of Mercury Gilding. Journal of Archaeological Science,2, 365–373.LOCOCK, A. J.,2008. An Excel spreadsheet to recast analyses of garnet into end-member components, and a synopsis of the crystal chemistry of natural silicate garnets. Computers & Geosciences, 34, 1769–1780.MANNERSTRAND, M., LUNDQVIST, L., 2013. Garnet chemistryfrom the Slöinge Excavation, Halland and additional Swedish and Danish excavations – comparisons with Garnet Occurring in a Rock Context. Journal of Archaeological Sciences,30(2), 169–183.MASS, J., MATSEN, C.,2013. Quantitative non-destructive analysis of historic silver alloys: X-ray fuorescence approaches and challenges. In: A.N. Shugar and J.L. Mass, eds. Handheld XRf for art and archaeology. Studies in Archaeological Sciences,3. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 215–247.MOOREy, P. R. S., 1985. Materials and Manufacture in Ancient Mesopotamia. Oxford: The Evidence of Archaeology and Art, BAR International Series, 237.MOSS, A. A., 1953. Niello. Studies in Conservation,1(2), 49–62.MOZGAI, V., BAJNóCZI, B., FóRIZS, I., MAy, Z., HATVANI, I. G., DáGI, M., MRáV, ZS., TóTH, M., 2017. Handheld XRF mapping of elemental composition of Roman silver artefacts: preliminary results. In: I. Montero-Ruiz and A. Perea, eds. Archaeometallurgy in Europe IV.Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científcas, pp. 237–247.MOZGAI, V., BAJNóCZI, B., MRáV, ZS., KOVACSóCZy, B., TóTH, M., 2019a. Application of a laboratory micro-X-ray difractometer (RIGAKU DMAX RAPID II) in the archaeometric analysis of archaeological artefacts – Case studies of metal objects. Archeometriai Műhely, 16(1), 29–42.MOZGAI, V., HORVáTH, E., MIHáCZI-PáLFI, A., HAJNAL, ZS., BAJNóCZI, B., 2019b. Metal composition and decoration techniques of polychrome gold and gilded silver brooches from the 5thcentury AD Carpathian Basin. In: YRA 2019Paris: Maison Archéologie-Ethnologie (MAE, Nanterre), p. 1.MOZGAI, V., TOPA, B. A., WEISZBURG, T. G., MRáV, ZS., BAJNóCZI B., 2019c. SEM–EDS and μ-XRD study of the niello inlays of a unique late Roman silver augur staf (lituus) from Brigetio, Pannonia (Hungary). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(4), 1599–1610.MOZGAI, V., BAJNóCZI, B., MAy, Z., MRáV, ZS., 2020. A hordozható XRF alkalmazási lehetőségei és korlátai római ezüsttálak archeometriai vizsgálatában. Possibilities and limitations of the use of handheld XRF in the archaeometric study of Roman silver platters. Archeometriai Műhely, 17(3), 253–270.MOZGAI, V., BAJNóCZI, B., MAy, Z., MRáV, ZS., 2021. Non-destructive handheld XRF study of archaeological composite silver objects – the case study of the late Roman Seuso Treasure. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 13, 83.NAGy, M., 2007.tierdarstellungen und der germanische tierstil I im Gebiet der Mittleren Donau (3.–6. Jahrhundert n. Chr.). Állatábrázolások és az I. germán állatstílus a Közép-Duna-vidéken. (Kr. u. 3–6. század).Monumenta Germanorum Archaeologica Hungariae, 5, Budapest: Hungarian National Museum.NEWMAN, R., DENNIS, J. R., FARREL, E., 1982. A technical note on niello. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 21(2), 80–85.NORTHOVER, P., LA NIECE, S.,2009. New thoughts on niello. In: A.I. Shortland, I. Freestone and T. Rehren., eds. from Mine to Microscope: Advances in the Study of Ancient technology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 145–154.ODDy, A., 1981. Gilding Through the Ages – An Outline History of the Process in the Old World. Gold Bulletin, 14(2), 75–79.ODDy, W. A., 1988. The gilding of Roman silver plate. In: F. Baratte and N. Duval, eds. Argenterie romaine et byzantine: actes de la table ronde, Paris 11–13 octobre 1983 Archéologie de l’antiquité tardive. Paris: De Boccard, pp. 9–21.ODDy W. A.,1991. Gilding: an outline of the technological history of the plating of gold on to silver or copper in the Old World. Endeavour, New Series, 15(1), 29–33.ODDy, A., 1993. Gilding of metals in the Old World. In: S. La Niece, P. Craddock, eds. Metal Plating and Patination – Cultural, technical and Historical Developments. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., pp. 171–181.ODDy, A., 2000.A History of Gilding with Particular Reference to Statuary. In: T. Drayman-Weisser, ed. Gilded Metals – History, technology and Conservation. London: Archetype Publications, pp. 1–19.ODDy, W. A., BIMSON, M., LA NIECE, S., 1983. The Composition of Niello Decoration on Gold, Silver and Bronze in the Antique and Mediaeval Periods. Studies in Conservation, 28(1), 29–35.PéRIN, P., CALLIGARO, T., 2016.Note sur l’origine des grenats utilisés par les orfèvres du haut Moyen Âge occidental européen. In: A. Bollók, G. Csíky and T. Vida, eds. Between Byzantium and the steppe: archaeological and historical studies in honour of Csanád Bálint on the occasion of his 70thbirthday. Budapest: Institute of Archaeology, Research Center for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp. 75–86.PERNICKA, E.,2014. Possibilities and limitations of provenance studies of ancient silver and gold. In: H.H. Meller, R. Rish and E. Pernicka, eds. Metals of power – Early gold and silver – Part 1.Halle (Saale): Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle, pp. 153–164.PERNICKA, E., BACHMANN, H. G., 1983. Archäometallurgische Untersuchungen zur antiken Silbergewinnung in Laurion – III. Das Verhalten einigen Spurenelemente beim Abtreiben des Bleis. Erzmetall, 36, 592–597.PION, C., GRATUZE, B., PéRIN, P., CALLIGARO, T., 2020. Chapter 36. Bead and garnet trade between the Merovingian, Mediterranean, and Indian Worlds. In: B. Efros and I. Moreira, eds. the oxford Handbook of the Merovingian World. New york: Oxford University Press, pp. 819–859.QUAST, D., SCHüSSLER, U., 2000.Mineralogische Untersuchungen zur Herkunft der Granate merovingzeitlicher Cloisonnéarbeiten. Germania,78, 75–96.RIEGL, A., 1927. Spätrömische Kunstindustrie.Wien. österreichische Staatsdruckerei.ROSENBERG, M., 1908. Niello. In: M. Rosenberg, ed. Geschichte der Goldschmiedekunst auf technischer Grundlage. Frankfurt a. M.: Verlag von Heinrich Keller, pp 1–36.ROTH, H., 1980. Almandinhandel und -verarbeitung im Bereich des Mittelmeeres. Zum archäologischen Befund und der schriftlichen überlieferung in der Spätantike und in frühen Mittelaltern. Beiträge zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Archäologie, 2, 309–335.SCHMETZER, K., GILG, H. A., SCHüSSLER, U., PANJIKAR, J., CALLIGARO, T., PéRIN, P., 2017. The linkage between garnets found in India at the Arikamedu historical site and their source at the Garibpet deposit. the Journal of Gemmology, 35(7), 589–627.SKINNER, B.J., 1966. The System Cu-Ag-S. Economic Geology, 61(1), 1–26.SKINNER, B.J., JAMBOR, J.L., ROSS, M., 1966. Mckinstryite, a new copper-silver sulfde. Economic Geology, 61(8), 1383–1389.SPEAR, F. S., 1995. Metamorphic Phase Equilibria and Pressure-temperature-time Paths. Washington: Mineralogical Society of America.STEMANN-PETERSEN, K., 1995. Danish niello inlays from the Iron Age – A technological investigation. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 12, 133–149.STEMANN-PETERSEN, K., 2003. Technology of 3rdto 12thcentury niello inlays found in Denmark. In: Archaeometallurgy in Europe: International Conference: 24–25–26 September 2003 Milan, Italy: Proceedings Vol. 1.,
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 45–67Viktória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, Bernadett Bajnóczi: Possibilities and Limitations of Non-Invasive Analytical Methods in the Examination of Garnet- and Niello-Inlaid Precious Metal Objects – Case Study of Three Polychrome Animal-Style Silver Buckles from the 5th-Century Carpathian Basin67Milan: Associazione Italiana di Metallurgia, pp. 351–360.SCHWEIZER, F., 1993. Nielle byzantine: étude de son evolution. Geneva, 41, 67–82.THEN-OBŁUSKA, J., GILG, H.A., SCHüSSLER, U., WAGNER, B., 2021. Western connections of Northeast Africa. The garnet evidence from late antique Nubia, Sudan. Archaeometry, 63(2), 227–246.TOKUHARA, y., TEZUKA, K., SHAN, y.J., IMOTO, H., 2009. Syntheses of complex sulfdes AgCuS and Ag3CuS2from the elements under hydrothermal conditions. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 117(3), 359–362.TyLECOTE, R. F., 1962. Metallurgy in Archaeology. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.VULIć, H., DORAčIć, D., HOBBS, R., LANG, J., 2017. The Vinkovci treasure of Late Roman silver plate: preliminary report. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 30, 127–150.ŽIVKOVIć, D., SOKIć, M., ŽIVKOVIć, Ž., MANASIJEVIć, D., BALANOVIć, L.J., ŠTRBAC, N., ćOSOVIć, V., BOyANOV, B., 2013. Thermal study and mechanism of Ag2S oxidation in air. Journal of thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 111, 1173–1176.
image/svg+xml