image/svg+xml3XII/1/2021INTERDISCIPLINARIA ARCHAEOLOGICANATURAL SCIENCES IN ARCHAEOLOGYhomepage: http://www.iansa.euEditorial IANSA 1/2021“Archaeological Finds and Analytical Methods” Workshop in the Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna (Austria)Irmgard HeinOn December 12–13th2019, a two-day workshop entitled “Archaeological Finds and Analytical Methods” was organised in Vienna (Figure 1). The aim of this workshop was to assess the diverse applications of analytical methods for diferent groups of inorganic fnd materials. The intention was to provide a discussion forum for archaeological researchers from Central Europe working in interdisciplinary felds to discuss the applicability of analytical methods.Given the rapid development of technology in recent years, the knowledge gained through practical application should be subjected to thorough discourse in a specialised circle: exchanging experiences from diferent geographical areas, and making critical observations.Within the workshop’s context, inorganic materials were a particular focus: ceramics, earth materials, stone and metal. Participation was also open to archaeologists from the felds of Egyptology, Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology, Classical Archaeology and Oriental Studies, all of whom were, at that time, undertaking interdisciplinary studies in materials analysis. An additional goal was that young researchers should receive some motivation for further project developments and be encouraged to establish information networks between Austria and the surrounding European countries. In addition to Austria, participants also came from the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Slovakia, Hungary and Denmark.The workshop emphasized that individual contributions should not only present results, but also focus on the applicability of the methods used and on any recent progress within individual methodological developments. Three key questions were addressed in the contributions: Which methods of analysis are applicable to individual groups of materials in diferent regions?Which potential new interpretations are enabled by the methods?What further developmental steps should be taken in the analytical techniques in order to obtain target-oriented results?In the course of the two-day workshop, a total of ffteen papers were presented and discussed in detail. Ten of them dealt with ceramics research, one with soil analysis in the residential sector, one with chipped stone, and three with metal analysis.Two keynote lectures introduced the presentations on both days. Claudio Capelli from the Universita di Genova (Italy) gave an overview of petrographic investigations on ceramics on the frst day, which introduced the topic of investigations on ceramics and earth materials, followed by ten other lectures and one lecture on soil investigations. Three of these topics are included in this volume:Susanne Cereda and Pamela Fragnoli are developing an investigation of two sediment samples from Arslantepe in Anatolia by looking at burnt earthen materials from two diferent points of view – micromorphology and petrography. The result of these diferent approaches to analysing the same samples is contrasted in discourse form.Aaron de Souza and Martina Trognitz provided an overview of the applicability of a photographic technique, Refectance Transformation Imaging (RTI), which was used to analyse the surface structures of handmade Middle Nubian pottery, dating from the 2ndmillennium BC (today southern Egypt and Sudan). This non-destructive technique allows conclusions to be drawn about the manufacturing processes.Laura Rembart and Lisa Betina are investigating the origin of Aswan pink clay, which from the 2ndcentury BCE onwards served as a raw material for pottery production that spread throughout Egypt. For this purpose, samples from clay deposits in the vicinity of Aswan (Egypt) were compared with those from the ceramics of the area.On the second day, Ernst Pernicka, senior director of the Curt Engelhorn-Centre (Mannheim, Germany) introduced the thematic group of metal analyses, from which two papers (Bühler and Schwarcz; Mozgai et al.) are included in this volume. Both papers deal with the analysis of precious metals, applying diferent methods.Victória Mozgai, Eszter Horváth, and Bernadett Bajnóczi studied silver buckles from the 5thcentury AD with non-Volume XII ● Issue 1/2021 ● Pages 3–5
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 3–5Irmgard Hein: “Archaeological Finds and Analytical Methods” Workshop in the Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna (Austria)4invasive methods. For example, niello decoration was examined for the frst time on such objects, and the garnet inlays were analysed with regard to the origin of these gemstones.The contribution of Birgit Bühler and David Z. Schwarcz investigates technological details on gold plates of the Avar culture from the 7th–8thcentury AD. By comparing the tool marks of the punching instruments used, they reveal which instruments were used and whether diferent goldsmiths were involved in the production.In the fnal discussion, several participants also expressed the wish for the development of fexible and transportable equipment to enable its increased use in the feld, as well as the wish for a more open handling practice with samples and specimens. Since the conditions for working with samples vary greatly in the diferent countries, it would be desirable to Figure 1.Workshop poster.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2021 ● XII/1 ● 3–5Irmgard Hein: “Archaeological Finds and Analytical Methods” Workshop in the Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna (Austria)5be able to standardise them, which could be possible through the fexible use of equipment. In addition, it was noted that there is a need for increased publication of thin sections in standardised form to enable the comparability of samples.The increasing importance of the use of LA-ICP-MS as an analytical method should be emphasised, as it is considered promising in its application for almost all material groups. Additionally, more attention should be paid to digital image analyses of materials; this methodology is still relatively underdeveloped in archaeology.The initiative and organisation for the workshop was carried out by Irmgard Hein, from the Institute for Egyptology and the Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science (VIAS). Financial support was provided by the Institute of Egyptology, VIAS, and the Material Cultures Research Focus,all at the Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies of the University of Vienna. We thank the heads of the above-mentioned institutions at the time of December 2019 so the workshop could be realised: E. Christiana Köhler, Tim Taylor and Günther Schörner, as well as the Dean’s Ofce of the Faculty, under Dean Sebastian Schütze.We are especially grateful to the head of the Prehistoric Department of the Natural History Museum Vienna, Anton Kern, who kindly made the premises available for the workshop and provided a very wonderful ambience for the participants. Sandra Müller is to be thanked for her active support in the preparations for the conference, as well as Irene Kaplan (Institute for Egyptology) and Gabriele Sentall (VIAS) for their administrative help.Unfortunately, the year 2020 and the worldwide outbreak of the Corona pandemic has also had an impact on the publication of the contributions. One planned contribution had to be postponed due to the lockdown in spring 2020, as access to the material for a review of the analyses was not possible.Finally, I would like to thank Jaromír Beneš and the editorial board, as well as Roderick B. Salisbury, for the opportunity to place the contributions of the workshop in a special issue of the journal IANSA, and to subject the articles to peer review. In particular, I would like to thank Ondřej Mlejnek, the executive editor for his patient supervision of the issue.Link to the Workshop program:https://egyptology.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_egyptology/news_events/Workshop_Programm_FINAL_2__Wiederhergestellt_.pdf
image/svg+xml