image/svg+xml135XI/2/2020INTERDISCIPLINARIA ARCHAEOLOGICANATURAL SCIENCES IN ARCHAEOLOGYhomepage: http://www.iansa.euEditorial IANSA 2/2020The Second Issue of the Jubilee Volume: Responsive Webpage as a Birthday GiftOndřej MlejnekAs we noted in the last issue, our journal has already crossed the threshold of its frst decade. It is therefore an appropriate opportunity to look back and evaluate the last ten years of the IANSA journal. It is also the right time for a celebration. However, because of the Covid19 restrictions, members of the IANSA Editorial and Advisory Boards could not meet personally and our last meeting had to take place online. Nevertheless, we have decided to give IANSA a birthday gift: a new version of a completely responsive web page (Figure 1). During the next year we will also try to improve our editorial system to make it more intuitive and easier for manipulation. The biggest advantage of the responsive web page is the easy browsing and searching for information. The web page will automatically adapt to the resolution of each particular device being used (whether it’s a computer with wide screen, lap-top, tablet or a cell phone).In this issue, you will fnd three papers written by the IANSA Editorial and Advisory Board members and their teams for the occasion of the IANSA’s tenth anniversary, which did not ft in the last issue. Another three interesting papers and a book review received in the last year have been added to make this issue complete.In the frst paper of this issue, Vladislav Noskevich and Natalia Fedorova present the results of the geophysical investigation of the Bronze Age settlement of Andreevskoye in the Southern Urals in Russia. Micro-magnetic and ground penetrating radar surveys have provided new information on the structure of the settlement fortifcation, its houses, as well as the wells discovered inside houses. The settlement consists of multiple layers and is characterized by a complex confguration formed by three rectangular systems of defensive structures. These results provide archaeologists with reliable data useful for possible future excavations.The second submission written by Zora Bielichová, Mária Hajnalová, Petra Kmeťová and Peter Barta presents the results of animal and plant macro-remains analyses from two cremation graves excavated in Devín-Záhrady in Slovakia. These graves belong to the Kalenderberg Group of the Hallstatt Culture dated back to the Early Iron Age. The results of these analyses have proved that animals constituted an important part of funerary ritual activities. Pigs, fsh, red deer, cattle, sheep and goats were all exploited at Devín-Záhrady. Plant macro-remains were much less common and were not associated with the burials.The third article written by Sergiy Gorbanenko summarizes the fnds of prehistoric and early historic common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) macro-remains from the area of current Ukraine. The frst presented fnd of charred micro-remains comes from the early Medieval hillfort of Bilsk. Two more fnds from Scythian sites are represented by imprints on clay products. The last fnd of charred cocklebur macro-remains comes from the Ancient Rus Manzhelia hillfort. These fndings present an important source of information for restoring the history of the appearance of the cocklebur in Europe.Another paper written by Peter Milo et al.presents the results of the geophysical prospection of the Staré zámky hillfort near Brno-Líšeň in the Czech Republic. Electrical resistivity tomography, georadar survey and large-scale magnetic prospection were all carried out here. The surveys resulted in the fnding of numerous settlement features, an Early Medieval cemetery, and fortifcations of various types. The results of previous archaeological excavations have helped with the interpretation of the geophysical data. Together, these results have provided an important insight into the history of the complex fortifed settlement of Staré zámky, although some questions which cannot be answered by geophysical research alone still remain unanswered.The thematic reviews section in this issue is represented by a paper written by the Chair of the IANSA Advisory Board, Roderick B. Salisbury. In this article, the author provides an overview of archaeological soil chemistry in Central Europe followed by an assessment of future developments in archaeological soil chemistry, molecular biogeochemistry, and the signifcance of geoarchaeology in multi-disciplinary research.The Book Review and the Backstory sections form the last part of this issue. Benjamin Štular has reviewed the monograph written by Jiří Macháček, Petr Milo et al.Volume XI ● Issue 2/2020 ● Pages 135–136
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2020 ● XI/2 ● 135–136Ondřej Mlejnek: The Second Issue of the Jubilee Volume: Responsive Webpage as a Birthday Gift136titled “The Early Medieval Burial Mound Cemetery of Bernhardsthal” (the original is in German). According to him, this book is a demonstration of the good practice of prompt publishing of research results and it can be recommended to all colleagues interested in the Early Medieval Period in Central Europe. In the Backstory section, Sabrina Save and Joseph Kovacik informally describe the founding of the Amélie and Terrascope facilities, a process which was full of hardships, but which has fnally led to two successful French geoarchaeological commercial laboratories. Whereas the older Amélielab is focused on providing paleoenvironmental and archaeometric services to archaeologists with the use of a pXRF device, the Terrascopeis a facility focused on the production of micromorphological thin sections.Although this IANSA issue is somewhat thinner than the last one, we hope that its contents will still attract your attention, as it again contains a series of interesting articles presenting new ideas and interesting fndings.Figure 1.A print screen of the new version of the IANSA journal responsive webpage.