image/svg+xml53 X/1/2019 InterdIscIplInarIa archaeologIca natural scIences In archaeology homepage: http://www.iansa.eu Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia Kelly Reed a* , Ivana Ožanić Roguljić b , Siniša Radović c , Tatjana Kolak d a Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, 34 Broad St, Oxford OX1 3BD, United Kingdom b Institute of Archaeology, Ljudevita Gaja 32, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia c Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Zrinski trh 11, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia d Museum of Lika, Ivana Bana Karlovića 1, 53 000 Gospić, Croatia 1. Introduction The country villa occupied a privileged place in the ideology of the Roman elite, as shown by texts from Cato, Varro and Columella, who emphasised the moral superiority of farming. Landowning and agriculture were deeply rooted in Roman traditions, symbolising their ancestral past, and was considered an excellent and prestigious source of income for Roman senators (Kehoe, 1997; Rosenstein, 2008). Large volumes of work exist on Roman villas, aiming to classify and make sense of the numerous variety of villas excavated over the past two centuries ( e.g. McKay, 1998; Percival, 1976; Smith, 1997). A villa can mean diferent things at diferent times, from the house of a farm, the house and adjoining buildings within an enclosure, and the entire estate including the buildings and the land, which all range in size, architecture and function (Smith, 1997, p.11; Torrenato, 2001). The “villa system” is typically referred to as a villa with both a pars urbana , for residential purposes, and a pars rustica , which was dedicated to agricultural production (Marzano, 2007, p.125). The term ‘agriculture’ was also not limited to the cultivation of crops and animal husbandry, but to any activity connected to the land and its natural resources, including the production of bricks, pottery, lime, timber and metal (Marzano, 2015). As a result, villas are often considered to be located in areas with agricultural potential, usually near streams or rivers ( e.g. Thomas, 1980, p.285; Oltean, Hanson, 2007). The villa would have therefore had its own complex socioeconomic system, interlinked with the wider Roman economy, where agriculture played a central role.Much of the evidence to date on “villa systems” comes from onsite plans and architectural fndings, literary sources, as well as pottery and other material culture. In contrast to this large body of data, few have explored the villa Volume X ● Issue 1/2019 ● Pages 53–63 *Corresponding author. E-mail: kellyreed@hotmail.co.uk ArtICLe InfO Article history: Received: 12 th November 2018Accepted: 6 th May 2019DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.24916/iansa.2019.1.4 Key words: Dalmatia Likaarchaeobotanyzooarchaeology Roman potteryfooddiet ABStrACt Large volumes of work exist on Roman villas; however, what the inhabitants ate on a daily basis at these sites is frequently overlooked. Here we present archaeobotanical, zooarchaeological and pottery evidence to explore aspects of daily consumption patterns within the rural villa of Lički Ribnik, Croatia. The remains date from the second half of the 2 nd to the frst half of the 3 rd century AD and provide the frst evidence of villa consumption in the Lika region. The discovery of broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum ) grains, domestic cattle ( Bos taurus ) and sheep ( Ovis aries ) bones suggest that they were consumed at the site. Diferent pottery types and fabrics also suggest a range of dishes were cooked, including the Roman dish patina . Although these conclusions are based on very limited data, the study shows the importance of looking at environmental evidence in conjunction with other archaeological material in order to explore local diet and economy in the Roman period.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 54 food system through the analyses of archaeobotanical and zooarchaeological remains. Where examined, the evidence has contributed meaningfully to the reconstruction of Roman villa production, management and supply, the preparation and consumption of foods, as well as exploring aspects of group identity, social status and ritual/religious practices ( e.g. Crabtree, 1990; King, 2001; Šoštarić, Küster, 2001; Olive, 2004; Padrós, Valenzuela Lamas, 2010; McCallum et al. , 2013; Árpád et al. , 2015).In Dalmatia, over 200 villae rusticae have been recognised or excavated and around 350 in regio X Venetia et Histria (Matijašić, 1998). However, few have provided evidence on diet and subsistence. Published deposits of archaeobotanical and zooarchaeological remains dating to the Roman period (1 st –5 th Century AD) in Croatia are still relatively rare. For example, only 12 sites have published archaeobotanical remains (see Reed, 2016 for summary; Essert et al. , 2018; Reed, Leleković, 2019; Reed et al. , 2019) and only three of these are from villa sites: the 3 rd –4 th century AD rural villa at Danilo, Dalmatia (Šoštarić, 2003), the 1 st –5 th century AD rural villa at Veli Brijun, Istria (Šoštarić, Küster, 2001), and the 2 nd –4 th century AD urban villa of Osijek-Silos (Reed et al. , 2019). Faunal data are even more underrepresented and only fve Roman period sites being published in Croatia (Alvàs-Marion, 2001; Brajković, Paunović, 2001; Campadelli, 2007; Miculinić, 2018; Šimić-Kanaet et al. , 2005; Šoštarić et al. , 2015). Of these, only two are from villa sites: the 1 st –2 nd century rural estate of Crikvenica – Igralište, Vinodol area (Miculinić, 2018) and the maritime villa, villae maritimae , of Loron, Istria (Brajković, Paunović, 2001). This paper therefore presents the frst evidence of Roman rural villa consumption in the Lika region of Dalmatia, examining the archaeobotanical, zooarchaelogical and pottery remains excavated from Lički Ribnik, Croatia. 2. The villa at Lički Ribnik Lički Ribnik is located in the meander of the river Lika, 6 km south of Gospić, in the Lika municipality (Figure 1). As a region, it can be characterized as a mountain plateau at altitudes between 450–700 m (Kokotović Kanazir et al. , 2016). The region has a humid continental climate, but experiences high diurnal ranges, especially in summer, and frost has been recorded in every month except for July, with strong blizzards in the winter. Today, grain yields of feld crops in the mountainous Lika region are considerably lower than in lowland areas of Croatia, mainly due to the poor soils and climatic limitations (Kovačević, Buzaši, 2005). In addition, the region sufers from a comparatively short growing period, due to the occurrence of late spring and early autumn frosts.Excavations began in 2012 after the discovery of tesserae from the Ribnik peninsula in the previous year. During the three-day trial excavation, architectural remains of a building were discovered along with fragments of a mosaic (Kolak, Figure 1. Location of Lički Ribnik and the other 12 sites with archaeobotanical remains dating to the Roman period. (1) Danilo, (2) Nadin-Gradina, (3) Port of Aenona/Zaton, (4) Caska, (5) Flacius Street, Pula (6) Veli Brijun, (7) Poreč, (8) Sčitarjevo, (9) Vitrovitica Kiškorija – jug, (10) Osijek – Silos, and Osijek – Park kraljice Katarine Kosače (11) Illok. 0 100 km
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 55 Figure 2. Plan of the Roman Villa at Lički Ribnik. Figure 3. Plan of the villa’s northern building at Lički Ribnik highlighting the stove within the villa kitchen where the archaeobotancial sample was collected. 0 40 m 0 4 m
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 56 Figure 4. Illustrations of the pottery recovered from Lički Ribnik. (1) amphora Dr 6b (2) amphora Dr 6b (3) bottom of pot (4) bottom of pot (5) rim of a bowl (6) bottom of a bowl (7) bottom of Pannonian plate (8) terra sigillata Consp. 27.1; 10 (9) Shard of Sarius cup (10) Shard of thin-walled pottery. 2013, p.163; 2015). The following year a geophysical survey revealed the remains of a large set of buildings (Mušič, 2014), 200 m 2 of which was revealed during excavations in 2014 and 2015 (Figure 2). The site represents a typical Roman villa rustica that operated as a farm or country-house with commercial ( pars rustica ) and household facilities ( pars urbana ) ( e.g. Buchi, 1987, p.109; Matijašić, 1998, p.115–145; Suić, 2003, p.323). The excavations so far suggest that the site was inhabited from the 1 st to 4 th Centuries AD.Within the northern part of the site (Zone A), the commercial part of the villa was identifed from a forge or smelting area and a possible ‘kitchen’ area to the east. The kitchen contained two stoves, one that was rectangular and one that was smaller and circular in shape. Within the forge, a large amount of slag, or waste from iron smelting was found. The geophysical survey suggests that the forge and kitchen were separated by a large room, which likely represents an open-air atrium. Other fnds include a loom weight and worn coins possibly dating to Marcus Aurelius (121–180 AD) or Verus Lucius (139–169 AD).Within the southern part of the site (Zone B), the stratigraphy was particularly challenging, but it is suggested that this was the residential area of the villa. Fragments of a foor mosaic were discovered under a wall aligned north-south. The fragments (dimensions 90 (120 cm) × 50 cm) show polychromatic geometrical motifs made in opus tesselatum , with two borders of a black and white meander with an integrated swastika and a black, white and red braid. The borders probably formed a frame around a feld of black rhombus shapes on a white foundation that could surround a small rhomboid or square panel with a decoration inside. A similar decoration is found in Valbadon, Istria (Meder, 2003, p.49, T XV: 2). The pattern of a mainly black and white geometrical foor mosaic with a double braid can be dated to the 2 nd Century AD (Meder, 2003, pp.19–20, 92–93), while the wall overlaying it likely dates to the 4 th Century AD. Other fnds included small copper coins of Theodosius I (383–388 AD) and sestertius of Gordian III (241–243 AD) and tubuli , indicating that the site had a hypocaust. 3. The remains recovered in the villa’s kitchen An archaeobotanical sample was collected from the large stove in the kitchen (Zone A; Figure 3). The sample, which was foated using bucket fotation and a 300μm sieve, contained over 300 broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum ) grains (Table 1), along with a possible pea and ten weed seeds, including large grasses, a corn cockle ( Agrostemma githago ) and two seeds from the buckwheat/knotgrass family ( Polygonum sp. and rumex sp.). Charcoal collected from the stove dated the layer to the second half of the 2 nd and frst half of the 3 rd century AD.The cultural layer above the stove contained 54 shards of Roman pottery that could be broadly grouped into kitchen ware, tableware and amphora (Figure 4). However, this was
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 57 a thin layer above the feature and may have been disturbed by ploughing or other agricultural activities. The most frequent pottery was coarse ware, mostly associated with cooking, storage or preparation, and these items were represented by three pottery fabric types that are believed to have slightly diferent uses (Figure 5). Fabric group 1 is represented by pots that are preserved only by their bottoms (Figure 4: 3, 4) and Fabric group 2 by a rim shard and the bottom of two cooking bowls (casseroles) of Aegean origin or imitating the Aegean cooking ware (Figure 4: 5, 6). Forms similar to these fnds can be dated to the 2 nd to 3 rd centuries AD (Parica, 2008, p.87; Taras, 2015). Fabric group 3 includes 16 shards of pots whose form could not be identifed, but they may belong to the typical Roman ovoid pots. In addition, the bottom of a red slipped baking pan (or plate) was found, possibly Pannonian in origin, dating from the 2 nd to 3 rd centuries AD (Ožanić Roguljić, 2016, pp.49–51).Fragments of tableware were also found and seemed to date to the earlier occupation of the site. In particular, a shard of a Sarius cup with a fragment of relief of a pillar with a capital holding another motif, maybe a bucranium, was recovered (Figure 4: 9). This kind of decoration is connected to the potter HILARUS, who dates from the early 1 st century AD (Augustus to Tiberius), or was made in his style. Similar examples of this decoration can be seen in Osor, Northern Liburnia (Makjanić, 1982, p.52; Brusić, 1999, p.182, Figure 50; Mantovani, 2011, p.173, Figure 7: 7). Further fnds included: one rim of North Italian sigillata (Padana) (Figure 4: 9) that could belong to the cylindrical cup Consp. Form 27.2 dated from 15–100 AD (Ettlinger et al. , 1990, p.100; Mazzeo Saracino, 1985, p.201), and one shard of thin-walled pottery with roulette decoration (Figure 4: 10) that shows elements of possible eastern Adriatic origin dating to the 1 st century AD (Ožanić Roguljić, 2011, pp.31–38). Table 1. Archaeobotanical remains from Lički Ribnik. Sample Ku. K-9: SJ26 & SJ18, U-1 Number Cereals Panicum miliaceum [grain]279cf. Panicum miliaceum [grain]49cf. triticum monococcum [grain]1 Cerealia [grain]1 Pulses cf. Pisum sativum 1Wild/Weedy species Agrostemma githago 1 Gramineae [large fragments]7cf. Polygonum sp.1 rumex sp.1 Paniceae 2Total343Indeterminate [fragments]6 Figure 5. Coarse pottery fabric groups: 1) Clay: reddish brown; hard; white irregular non-dissolvable inclusions (quartz), and white irregular dissolvable (limestone), grog, small irregular voids; 2) Clay: dark reddish brown; hard, white irregular non-dissolvable inclusions (quartz), big irregular voids; 3) Clay: black- greyish; hard, white irregular non-dissolvable inclusions (quartz).
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 58 4. The remains recovered in the villa’s southern building Animal bones were collected from two pits near the mosaic within the southern part of the site (Zone B; Figure 6). In total there were only eleven fragments. The identifed taxa include two common domestic animals: sheep ( Ovis aries ) and cattle ( Bos taurus ).Four skeletal fragments were recovered from one pit (SJ2). Three of them are assigned to a sheep ( Ovis aries ): small horn fragment, fused proximal end of a left humerus, and a complete right metacarpal. In addition to these fragments, an unfused proximal epiphysis of a sheep or goat ( Ovis/Capra ) right tibia was also found. The lack of diagnostic features prevents an accurate identifcation of this bone (see Zeder and Lapham, 2010, for summarised list of criteria), however, its presence with other positively identifed sheep bones would suggest that this element belongs to the same taxon, bearing in mind that this does not exclude the presence of goats within the villa. These remains came from at least two diferent animals, one young (unfused tibia) and one adult. Except for some light weathering present on the surface, these fragments show very little bone modifcations and exhibit no cut marks or any breakage patterns typical for butchery. However, three humeri and metacarpal fragments have traces of burning that are irregularly shaped and reddish-brown in colour. They are partially burnt on their proximal end (across articulated surface) suggesting that the remainder of the bone was probably still covered with soft tissue (muscle and/or skin). Such patterns of bone modifcation are typical for intentional food preparation by roasting or boiling (Lyman, 1994, pp.385–386). The horn fragment is completely burnt (partially carbonised with dominant dark grey colour). As this fragment comes from a non-edible body part it is probably butchery waste and its burning accidental, i.e. unrelated to food preparation.From another pit (SJ7) there are seven skeletal fragments, six originating from domestic cattle ( Bos taurus ): a fragment of a scapula blade, a left distal humerus (fused), two right distal humeri shafts, a left tibia shaft, and a small fragment of a right calcaneus. A small fragment of indeterminate fat bone of a large-sized animal was also discovered, which could have belonged to the aforementioned cattle scapula, but it lacks characteristic morphological features for a positive identifcation. These cattle remains belonged to three diferent individual animals of indeterminate age. Unlike the sheep remains, none of these bones had traces of burning. However, the presence of butchery marks is identifed on all three humeri fragments and a calcaneus, as well as on the indeterminate fat bone fragment. There are two distinctive types: chop or hack marks, likely from a heavy knife or a cleaver (Seetah, 2004), and cut marks. The former have been recognised on humeri shafts at other Figure 6. Plan of the villa’s southern building at Lički Ribnik showing the location of the animal remains. 0 2 m
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 59 sites indicating that these bones were transversally chopped into segments, either for easier food preparation or to extract bone marrow (Maltby, 2007). Regular cut marks can be seen on articular ends and across shafts and most likely came from meat removal. In addition, one humerus fragment is gnawed on the distal end, probably by dogs, suggesting that at least some of these remains were to a certain degree exposed to outside factors before being deposited into the pit.Two rims of Dressel 6b amphorae of Istrian origin (Figure 4: 1, 2) are found in this part of the site (SU 2, Kv M, N-7,8) belonging to the 2 nd half of the 2 nd or 1 st half of the 3 rd century AD. 5. Millet consumption at Lički Ribnik Ancient sources suggest that before the establishment of the Roman province of Dalmatia, the Iapodians inhabited the Lika region and lived for the most part on spelt and millet (Strabo VII, 4, 10). Later during the late 2 nd and early 3 rd century, AD historian Cassius Dio, in mentioning Augustus’s campaign against the Pannonians (the neighbouring province to Dalmatia) in 35 BC, states of these people ‘they do not cultivate [that is, make] wine, except for a little bit which is bad, since they spend most of the time in a very harsh winter [climate], but rather eat and drink both barley and millet’ (Dio Cassius 49.36, 2–4). Beer was not popular with the Romans and beer drinking was considered barbaric and a custom of the poor (Miličević Bradač, 1999–2000, pp.69–70). The absence of sprouting grains (either millet or barley), which indicate grain-based fermented beverages, makes it impossible to confrm whether brewing was conducted at the villa.In Dalmatia, millet is rarely found in Roman contexts, although very few sites have been sampled. Of the villa sites, only eight grains of broomcorn millet were recovered from Veli Brijun, four from Osijek-Silos (Reed et al. , 2019), and no millet from Danilo (Šoštarić, Küster, 2001; Šoštarić, 2003). Small quantities of millet ( Panicum miliaceum ) have also been found at the Dalmatian hillfort of Nadin-Gradina (Nye, 1996), the port of Aenona (Gluščević et al. , 2006), the pannonian village at Vitrovitica Kiškorija (Šoštarić et al. , 2015), and the graves at Ilok and Sćitarjevo (Šoštarić et al. , 2006) (Figure 1). Nonetheless, this does not mean that millet was regularly consumed in the region. From stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses of Iron Age, Roman, and Early Medieval human bone collagen recovered from sites just south of Lički Ribnik, there is little evidence of signifcant C4 foodstuf being eaten, whether directly consumed by humans or eating animals that were fed on millet, until the end of the Roman period (Lightfoot et al. , 2012).Millet has been discovered at other villa sites across the empire, but similarly in small quantities. Finds in Hungary are sporadic with only Sopron-Beloiannisz tér 6, a 4 th –5 th century AD building, yielding 1,000 broomcorn millet grains (Gyulai, 2010). Even in Italy very few millet fnds are noted (Murphy, 2016, Figure 2). So its discovery at Lički Ribnik, within a kitchen stove, may indicate that the grains were intended for human consumption. Ancient texts support this, suggesting that millet was consumed either for food or as medicine in Italy and was grown, according to Pliny (N.H. XVIII.xxiv-xxv), in Campania and on the banks of the Po. Columella (Col. II.ix.19) notes that bread made of millet “may be eaten without distaste before it cools. Panic, when ground and freed from bran, and millet as well, makes a porridge which, especially with milk, is not to be despised even in time of plenty.” The 4 th century AD medical writer Oribasius (I.15.1–3) writes that “on occasion bread is made from [millet], whenever there occurs a shortage of those grains useful for food”, while “countryside people boil meal made from millet and then eat it after mixing in lard or olive-oil”, “millet is better than panic in every respect: for it is more pleasant in taste, not so difcult to digest, constipates the stomach less, and is more nutritious”. In these texts it is generally agreed that millet or Milium refers to broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum ), while panic refers to foxtail millet ( Setaria italica ).Many of the ancient agricultural writers refer to millet; however, it is important to note that these texts are generally biased towards elite audiences with large-scale agricultural farms located in fertile plains of the Po valley, Campania, and surrounding Rome (MacKinnon, 2004, p.16). What types of soil best suited millet cultivation is debated in the texts: Columella (II.ix.17) recommends light loose soil, Cato (VI.1) rich soil in areas where fog is prevalent, while Pliny (N.H. 18.xxv.101) suggests millet should receive very little water. Columella (II.ix.18) notes that “[Panic and millet] cannot be sown before spring, for they are fond of warm weather above all; but they are entrusted to the earth to best advantage in the latter part of March”. Pliny (N.H. 18.10) too states that millet was sown both in the spring and summer. Today’s millets, including broomcorn millet, ofer a modest yield under marginal farming conditions, with poor soils, short growing seasons and with low to no input, making them an attractive crop option in mountain, hill and tribal agricultural areas (Padulosi et al. , 2009). The mountainous region surrounding Lički Ribnik would have likely suited millet cultivation, especially as it too is afected with poor soils and a relatively short growing season. Other advantages of millet cultivation mentioned by ancient authors include the small volume of sowing seed required (Col. II.ix.18), as well as the fact that it can be stored within the husks for longer periods than other grains (Col. II.ix.18; Pliny XVIII.x.60-xi). Strabo (5.i.12) also remarks that in the Po valley millet was a sure protector against famine when other crops failed. Other notes on millet cultivation include the necessity to manure and plant legumes to replenish the soil (Col.II.xiii.3), and the need to repeatedly weed (Col. II.ix.18). 6. Animal husbandry and meat consumption at Lički Ribnik Focus on the relative proportions of the three main domestic species, cattle, sheep/goat, and pig, in zooarchaeological
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 60 assemblages from the Roman Empire has been comparatively high. King (1999) noted very generally that the inhabitants of Italy enjoyed a heavily pig-dominated diet, whereas assemblages from Roman Britain were generally dominated by cattle and sheep/goat, from Roman Germany by both pig and cattle, and in Roman Provence by sheep/goat. In Hungary, cattle are overwhelmingly dominant in faunal assemblages, especially from military sites, while caprines and pig vary across the region (Bartosiewicz, 1990–1991; Choyke, 2003, p.212). These variations are said to emphasise, along with environmental and economic considerations, the role of cultural choice in explaining to what degree cattle, pig and sheep were exploited in a region (King, 1999).In Croatia, most of the zooarchaeological remains from Roman sites represent relatively low numbers of animals, which prevents any conclusions regarding any preference for certain species. For example, at Crikvenica – Igralište 467 bones identifed to genus/species represented fve cattle (2 adults and 3 juvenile), six sheep/goat (3 adults, 2 juvenile and 1 indet age), fve pigs (4 juveniles and 1 adult) and one juvenile chicken, along with horse, dog, red deer, wild boar and badger (Miculinić, 2018, p.84). At Lički Ribnik only three cattle and two sheep (1 juvenile and 1 adult) are represented. Thus, these small assemblages are unlikely to be representative of the frequency of cattle, sheep/goat and pig in the region. However, today the inhabitants of the Lika region use the nearby mountains for grazing sheep during the summer months (Vukelić, 2002), and so sheep herding could have been practised as part of the Lički Ribnik villa system.Most of the information we have about animal husbandry for the Roman period comes from the Roman agronomists Cato, Varro and Columella. They suggest that cattle were exploited for ploughing, caprines for wool and milk and pigs for meat and manure. In particular, Cato (RR 76–81), Varro RR (2.2 f,) and Columella (VII. 2.1) mention the importance of sheep and goat milk, especially in relation to the making of cheese (Columella XII.13). In terms of meat processing, it is suggested that animals were generally slaughtered in winter; due to the lower temperatures allowing the meat to be better preserved (Palladius, Op. agric . 13:6). Once slaughtered, the animals would have been butchered, likely with a cleaver, a large butcher’s knife used for intensive slicing and dismemberment (Dobney et al. , 2002; Seetah, 2012). These types of cut marks, from a heavy knife, were identifed on the cattle bones recovered from Lički Ribnik. In addition, long bones ( i.e. humerus and tibia) dominate the assemblage. These are typically identifed as parts of the animal that are higher in meat. It is therefore likely that the majority of the remains recovered from the pits at Lički Ribnik represent butchered sections of meat. Once the animal was processed, the meat portions obtained were prepared to be preserved or to be cooked. A number of techniques may have been employed to preserve foodstufs, for example, salt-curation, smoking, marinating and drying (Leguilloux, 2002). If cooked, the meat could have been grilled, roasted, boiled, stewed or fried (Varro R.R. 5.109). At Lički Ribnik, evidence of burning on some of the sheep bones and three distal humeri of cattle may be indicative of cooking and consumption activities at the villa. 7. Food preparation in Dalmatia Although over 200 villas have been identifed and excavated in the Roman province of Dalmatia, only the villa at Danilo Šematorij provides evidence of an oven that is probably part of a kitchen (Pedišić, 2000, p.523). Even within urban settlements only one kitchen feature has been identifed from Nadin (Nedinum), while possible kitchen waste was recently identifed from Bribir (Varavaria) (Pers. comm. Martina Čelhar and Igor Borzić). Thus, the kitchen discovered at Lički Ribnik provides a unique glimpse of a Roman villa kitchen in the Dalmatia region. The size and function of a Roman “kitchen” varied from house to house depending on many factors such as social status and the size of the property ( e.g. Foss, 1994, pp.71–73, p.173; Varro Vita Populi Romani, frg. 28 (Non. p. 55M); Varro RR 1.13.2). Small households may simply have a cooking area using a brazier to cook food or no cooking facilities at all, while large urban and rural villas would have the space for specifc rooms for cooking and storage, although portable braziers are also mentioned ( e.g. McKay, 1998, p.94; Packer, 1971). As at Lički Ribnik, kitchens at many of the larger properties were generally located far away from the dining area and near a water source (Foss, 1994, pp.172–173).In Pompeii, kitchens had large masonry installations, with a stove leaning against the wall (Alfonso et al. , 2013, pp.71–92; Bonini, 2011; Bonini, Dal Porto, 2003). Yet at Lički Ribnik a round and a rectangular stove were discovered placed in the middle of the room (Figure 7). The rectangular stove, made from stone and daub, was likely raised on a structure several feet above the foor and cooking would have taken place on top, where pots were placed over the ashes of small fres (Jelinčić Vučković, 2015, p.70). The archaeobotanical samples discussed here were recovered from the rectangular stove. The round stove was likely a small clay oven of the ‘beehive type’ used to bake bread and bakery goods, but also other foods like meat, fsh, cereals, legumes and vegetables could be roasted, dried or baked in it (Foss, 1994, pp.66–67; Apicius 5.3.2, 5.4.6, 6.5.6, 7.2.1, 7.4.1–2, 7.5.1, 7.9.1, 7.10, 7.13.2, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.6.8–10, 8.7.1, 8.7.5, 8.7.7–9, 8.7.14, 8.8.1, 8.8.3, 8.8.12, 10.1.4.).As well as the structures in the kitchen, the study of vessels associated with culinary practices can provide important information on how utensils may have been used to process, cook and serve food at the villa. Each meal would have required certain cooking wares adapted to the diferent heat intensities to which the food product had to be exposed. For example, Fabric 1 pots found at Lički Ribnik are believed to be used for cooking food for long periods, such as for stewing (Arthur, 2007, pp.18–19) and brewing. Fabric 2 bowls were suitable for cooking cereals and pulses, as well as meat like goat, mutton or lamb. Cooking in these open vessels enabled the liquid to evaporate, resulting in a dry or thick dish which
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 61 could be accompanied by some sort of sauce (Arthur, 2007, p.18). The discovery of Dressel 6b amphoras may suggest the importation of olive oil to the villa, although its later smaller variants could also be used for wine, fruit or garum (Marion, Starac, 2001).The discovery of a shard of a red slipped baking pan could suggest that the dish patina (a Roman dish including various ingredients mixed with eggs) or bread was also being made and eaten at the villa. Because of the design of the Italic pan, with its broad, shallow body, straight walls and fat bottom, food baked in it would have taken on a defned form, such as savoury or sweet pies, or quiches. In De re conquinaria by Apicius the Roman taste for such preparations is seen, where these pans are specifcally called for in 53 of the recipes. The most popular type of dish described by Apicius is the patina, to which an entire chapter with 37 recipes is devoted. It is important to note, however, that this cook book was likely directed towards an elite audience in Rome, but recipes probably fltered through society and may have been cooked at the villa site in Lika. 8. Conclusion Archaeobotanical, zooarchaeological and pottery evidence was collected from the rural villa of Lički Ribnik, Croatia. The remains date from the second half of the 2 nd to the frst half of the 3 rd century and provide the frst evidence of villa consumption in the Lika region. The data is particularly limited and is not representative of the diet at the villa, but does provide a glimpse of some items that could have been consumed at the site. The discovery of broomcorn millet ( Panicum miliaceum ) within the large rectangular stove in the presumed villa kitchen suggests that millet was eaten at Figure 7. Picture of the two stoves within the villa’s kitchen at Lički Ribnik. the villa, although possibly as a minor crop. The discovery of broomcorn millet is also particularly important as millet is not regularly mentioned in ancient agrarian texts and is not often identifed in archaeobotanical or isotopic studies across the Roman Empire. Evidence of cut marks on the cattle bones and burning on the sheep bones, found in the southern part of the villa, probably indicate evidence of butchery and cooking techniques at the site. The pottery fragments recovered indicate that a range of dishes could have been cooked at the villa, including the Roman dish patina . Unfortunately, further conclusions about who may have been eating these items or how they were consumed is not possible from the limited evidence presented here. Nevertheless, the study does show the importance of collecting and examining environmental evidence in conjunction with other archaeological material in order to understand local diet and economy at Roman period sites. Acknowledgements This paper is part of the project “Life on the Roman Road” (LRR – UIP-05-2017-9768, Croatian science foundation). Many thanks to the two referees, who provided valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Ancient sources Apicius . Apicius, De re coquinaria, O kuvanju/ Apicije . Edited and translated by Svetlana Slapšak. Latina et Graeca, Zagreb, 1989. Cato Agr. Marcus Porcius Cato Censorius, De agricultura, http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cato.html, 20.10. 2018. Columella RR. L. Junius Moderatus Columella, De Re Rustica, http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/columella.html, 14.4.2018.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 62 Dio Cassius. Dio Cassius Cocceianus, Ῥωμαϊκὴ ἱστορία, ŠAŠEL KOS, M. , Zgodovinska podoba prostora med Akvilejo, Jadranom in Sirmijem pri Kasiju Dionu in Herodijanu , Ljubljana, 1986. Oribasius . Oribasius, Collectiones medicae, GRANT, M., A translation of Books 1 and 4 of Oribasius’ Medical Compilations with an introduction and commentary , Leiden – New York – Cologne 1997. Plinius NH. Gaius Plinius Secundus, naturalis Historia , http://la.wikisource.org/wiki/Naturalis_Historia 15.9.2018. Palladius, Op. agric. Rutilius Taurus Aemilianus Palladius, Opus agriculturae, http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/palladius/agr.html, 25.10.2018. Strabo . Strabo. The Geography of Strabo, http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/7E*.html, 11.08.2018. Varro, Vita Populi Romani. Marcus Terentius Varro, De vita populi romani . M. terenti Varronis, De vita populi Romani. Milan: Società Editrice “ Vita e Pensiero”. Varro . 1977–1979, 1 st ed. 1938. Varro RR. Marcus Terentius Varro , Rerum rusticarum de agri cultura. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Varro/de_Re_Rustica/home.html 22.10.2018 References ALFONSO, G., BRUNET-GASTON, V., CABANIS, M., CAILLAT, P., CLÉMENÇON, B., COLOMBIER-GOUGOUZIAN, A., RÉMY, B., WITTMANN, A., 2013. Les Espaces De Cuisine D’un Édifce Public Ou Collectif D’Augustonemetum/Clermont-Ferrand (Puy-De-Dôme). Gallia , 70(1), 71–92.ALVÀS-MARION, S. 2001. Les coquillages. In: F. Tassaux, R. Matijašić, and V. Kovačić, eds. Loron (Croatie): Un grand centre de production d’amphores à huile istriennes (Ier – Ive s. p.c.). Bordeaux: Institut Ausonius, pp. 293–295.ÁRPÁD, K., MÁTÉ, S., and ÁKOS, P., 2015. Archaeobotanical data on the economy of the Roman Villa of Cserdi–Horgas-Dűlő (Baranya County, Hungary). Archeometriai Műhely , 12(3), 205–220.ARTHUR, P., 2007. Pots and boundaries. On cultural and economic areas between late antiquity and the early middle ages. In: M. Bonifay, and J.-Ch. Treglia, eds. Late roman Coarse Wares, Cooking Wares and Amphorae in the Mediterranean: Archaeology and Archaeometry II . Oxford: BAR International Series 1662, pp. 15–28.BARTOSIEWICZ, L., 1990–1991. Animal bones as indicators of continuity at Roman Provincial sites. Antaeus , (1990–91), 103–124.BRAJKOVIĆ, D., and PAUNOVIĆ, M. 2001. La faune des vertébrés du site archéologique de Loron. In: F. Tassaux, R. Matijašić, and V. Kovačić, eds. Loron (Croatie): Un grand centre de production d’amphores à huile istriennes (Ier – Ive s. p.c.). Bordeaux: Institut Ausonius, pp. 279–291.BONINI, P., 2011. Le tracce del sacro. Presenze della religiosita privata nella Grecia Romana. In: F. M. Bassani, and di Ghedini, eds. religionem signifcare: aspetti storico- religiosi, strutturali, iconografci e materiali dei sacra private. A tti dell’incontro di Studi (Padova, 8–9 giugno 2009). Padova: Università di Padova, Edizional Quasar, pp. 205–228.BONINI, P., and DAL PORTO, C., 2003. Le cucine. In: P. Basso, and F. Ghedinj, eds. Subterraneae domus: Ambienti residenziali e di servizio nell’edilizia privata romana . Verona: Cierre, pp. 467–491.BRUSIĆ, Z., 1999. Hellenistic and roman relief Pottery in Liburnia . Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series, 817.BUCHI, E., 1987. Assetto agrario, risorse e attività economiche. In: E. Buchi, ed. Il Veneto nell’età romana. I, Storiografa, organizzazione del territorio, economia e religione . Verona, pp. 103–183.CAMPEDELLI, A. 2007. Relazione della campagna di rilievo e scavo nel castrum Romano di Burnum, Drniš (18–30 agosto 2006) / Izvješće o kampanji izrade arheološke dokumentacije i arheoloških iskopavanja rimskoga vojnoga logora Burnum, Drniš (18.–30. kolovoza 2006.). In: A. Cambi, M. Glavičić, D. Maršić, Ž. Miletić, and J. Zaninović, eds. rimska vojska u Burnumu / L’esercito romano a Burnum. Drniš – Šibenik – Zadar: Gradski muzej Drniš, pp. 50–62.CHOYKE, A., 2003. Animals and Roman Lifeways in Aquincum. In: K. Póczym, and P. Zsidi, eds. Forschungen in Aquincum, 1969–2002 . Aquincum Nostrum II/2. Budapest: Budapesti Torténeti Muzeum, pp. 210–232.CRABTREE, P., 1990. Zooarchaeology and complex societies. In: M.B. Schifer, ed. Advances in Archaeological Method and theory , Volume 2. New York: Academic Press, pp. 155–204.DOBNEY, K., JACQUES, D., and IRVING, B., 2002. Of butchers and breeds: report on vertebrate remains from various sites in the City of Lincoln. Lincoln: City of Lincoln Council.ESSERT, S., KONCANI-UHAČ, I., UHAČ, M., and ŠOŠTARIĆ R., 2018. Plant remains and amphorae from the Roman harbour under Flacius Street in Pula (Istria, Croatia). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10(4), 955–971.ETTLINGER, E., HEDINGER, B., HOFFMANN, B., KENRICK, P.M., PUCCI, G., ROTH-RUBI, K., SCHNEIDER, G., VON SCHNURBEIN, S., WELLS, C.M., ZABEHLICKY-SCHEFFENEGGER, S., 1990. Conspectus formarum terrae sigillatae italico modo confectae . Materialen zur romisch-germanischen Keramik 10. Bonn: Halbelt.FARMER V., 1918 roman farm Management, the treaties of Cato and Varro done into english, with notes of Modern Instances . New York: Dodo Press.FOSS, P., 1994. Kitchens and Dining Rooms at Pompeii: the spatial and social relationship of cooking to eating in the Roman household . Unpublished thesis (PhD), University of Michigan.GLUŠČEVIĆ, S., JURIŠIĆ, M., ŠOŠTARIĆ, R., VUJČIĆ KARLO, S., 2006. Evidence for the Nutrition of Sailors from the Roman Harbour at Zaton near Zadar . Archaeologia Maritima Mediterranea , 3, 147–161.GYULAI, F., 2010. Archaeobotany in Hungary. Seed, fruit, food and Beverages Remains in the Carpathian Basin: an Archaeobotanical Investigation of Plant Cultivation and ecology from the neolithic until the Late Middle Ages . Budapest: Archaeolingua.JELINČIĆ VUČKOVIĆ, K., 2015. Rimsko selo u provinciji Gornjoj Panoniji: Virovitica Kiškorija Jug . Zagreb: Instituta za arheologiju.KEHOE, D., 1997 . Investment, jurists, and tenancy: the jurists and the roman agrarian economy . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.KING, A., 1999. Meat diet in the Roman world: a regional inter-site comparison of the mammal bones. Journal of Roman Archaeology , 12, 168–202.KING, A.C., 2001. The Romanization of diet in the western Empire: comparative archaeozoological studies. In: S. Keay and N. Terrenato, eds. Italy and the West: comparative issues in Romanization . Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 210–223.KOKOTOVIĆ KANAZIR, V., FILIPOVIĆ, M., and PANIĆ, M., 2016. Demographic Characteristics of Lika Region. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic” , 66(1), 45–59.KOLAK, T. 2015, Ribnička villa rustica, In: Arheološko istraživanje 2012–2015. Lička revija, 14, Gospić: Matica hrvatska u Gospiću, pp. 7–15.KOLAK, T., 2013. Antički lokalitet u Ribniku pored Gospića . Zadarska smotra: časopis za kulturu, znanost i umjetnost , 62(3), 162–170.KOVAČEVIĆ, V., and BUZAŠI, I., 2005. Climate and soil limitations for wheat and maize growing in Lika region. traktor I Pogonske Mašine , 10(2), 79–85.LEGUILLOUX, M., 2002. Les salaisons de viande: l’apport de l’archéozoologie. In: A. Curii and D. Vitali, eds. Animali tra uomini e dei. Archeozoologia del mondo preromano . Bologna: Studi e scavi, 14, pp. 139–152.LIGHTFOOT, E., SLAUS, M., and O’CONNELL, T.C., 2012. Changing cultures, changing cuisines: cultural transitions and dietary change in Iron Age, Roman and Early Mediaeval Croatia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 148, 543–556.LYMAN, R.L., 1994. Vertebrate taphonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.MACKINNON, M., 2004. Production and Consumption of Animals in roman Italy: Integrating the Zooarchaeological and textual evidence . Rhode Island: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series, 54.MAKJANIĆ, R., 1982. “Sarius” cups with relief decoration from Osor. Vjesnik Arheološkog muzeja u Zagrebu , 14(1), 49–54.MALTBY, M., 2007. Chop and Change: Specialist Cattle Carcass Processing in Roman Britain.In: B. Croxford, N. Ray, and R. Roth, eds. TRAC 2006: Proceedings of the 16 th Annual theoretical roman Archaeology Conference. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 59–76.MANTOVANI, V., 2011. La terra sigillata decorata dello scarico di via Retratto ad adria. Quaderni friulani di Archeologia , 21, 165–184.
image/svg+xmlIANSA 2019 ● X/1 ● 53–63Kelly Reed, Ivana Ožanić Roguljić, Siniša Radović, Tatjana Kolak: Daily Food Consumption in a Rural Roman Villa: Excavations at Lički Ribnik, Croatia 63 MARION, Y., and STARAC, A., 2001. Les amphores. In: F. Tassaux, R. Matijašić, and V. Kovačić, eds. Un grand centre de production d’amphores à huile istriennes (IER-IVE S. P. C.) . Bordeaux: Pessac, pp. 97–126.MARZANO, A., 2007. roman Villas in Central Italy. A Social and economic History . Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition, 30. Leiden and Boston: Brill.MATIJAŠIĆ, R., 1998. Gospodarstvo antičke Istre . Pula.MAZZEO SARACINO, L., 1985. Terra sigillata nord-italica. In: Atlante Delle Forme Ceramiche, II. Ceramica fne romana nel bacino mediterraneo (tardo ellenismo e primo impero) . Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.MCCALLUM, M., VANDERLEEST, H., VEAL, R., TAYLOR, A., COONEY, L., BROWN, L., MUNRO, M., 2011. The Roman Villa at San Felice: Investigations, 2004–2010. Mouseion 3(11), 25–108.MCKAY, A., 1998. Houses, Villas and Palaces in the roman World . 2 nd ed. Baltimore: MD, Johns Hopkins University Press.MEDER, J., 2003. Podni mozaici u Hrvatskoj, od 1. do 6.stoljeća. Zagreb.MICULINIĆ, K. 2018. Animal exploitation at the Roman site of Crikvenica – Igralište. In: G. Lipovac Vrkljan, and A Konestra, eds. Pottery Production, Landscape and Economy of Roman Dalmatia . Archaeopress Roman Archaeology, 47. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 81–88.MILIĆEVIĆ BRADAČ, M., 1999/2000. Brómos ou Brómios – Bromo, a ne Bromije (Anth. Pal. 9. 368). Opuscula Archaeologica , 23–24, 65–76.MURPHY, C., 2016. Finding Millet in the Roman world. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences , 8(1), 65–78.MUŠIČ, B., 2014. Izvješće o geofzičkim istraživanjima na arheološkom lokalitetu Ribnik kod Gospića . Ljubljana.NYE, S., 1996. The plant remains. In: J. Chapman, R. Shiel, and Š. Batović, eds. the Changing face of Dalmatia . Leicester: Leicester University Press, pp. 240–242.OLIVE, C., 2004. La faune exhumée des mithraea de Martigny (Valais) et d’Orbe-Boscéaz (Vaud) en Suisse. In: M. Martens, and G. De Boe, eds. roman Mithraism: the evidence of the Small finds . Brussels: Vlaams Instituut.OLTEAN, I.A., and HANSON, W.S., 2007. Villa settlements in Roman Transylvania. Journal of Roman Archaeology 20, 113–137.OŽANIĆ ROGULJIĆ, I., 2011. Terra sigillata i keramika tankih stjenki s lokaliteta Crikvenica – Igralište. In: G. Lipovac Vrkljan, B. Šiljeg, I. Ožanić Roguljić, A. Konestra, eds. Rimske Keramičarske I Staklarske radionics . Proizvodnja i trgovina na jadranskom prostoru: zbornik II. međunarodnog arheološkog kolokvija, Crikvenica, 28.–29. listopada 2011. Crikvenica: Institut za arheologiju – Muzej grada Crikvenice, pp. 31–38.OŽANIĆ ROGULJIĆ, I., 2016. Tipologija rimske keramike iz Vinkovaca . Zagreb: Institut za arheologiju.PACKER, J.E., 1971. The Insulae of Imperial Ostia. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, vol. 31. Rome: The American Academy in Rome.PADRÓS, N., and VALENZUELA LAMAS, S., 2010. La Llosa and Els Antigons, an approach to stockbreeding in the villae of the ager Tarraconensis. 3 rd –6 th centuries AD. In: M. Prevosti Monclus, and J. Guitart Duran, eds. Ager tarraconensis . Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans, pp. 200–207.PADULOSI, S., BHAG, M., BALA RAVI, S., GOWDA, J., GOWDA, K.T.K., SHANTHAKUMAR, G., YENAGI N., and DUTTA, M., 2009. Food Security and Climate Change: Role of Plant Genetic Resources of Minor Millets. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources , 22(1), 1–16.PARICA, M., 2008, The eastern Mediterranean pottery from the ancient harbour in Pakoštane. Prilozi Instituta za arheologiju u Zagrebu , 25, 81–96.PEDIŠIĆ, I.S., 2000. Konzervatorski zahvati i najnoviji rezultati zaštitnih arheoloških istraživanja u Danilu, Opvscvla Archaeologica , 23–24, 521–527.PERCIVAL, J., 1976. the roman villa: an historical introduction . London: Batsford.REED, K., 2016. Archaeobotany in Croatia: An overview. Journal of the Archaeological Museum in Zagreb, 49(1), 7–28.REED, K, and LELEKOVIĆ, T., 2019. First evidence of rice (Oryza cf. sativa L.) and black pepper (Piper nigrum) in Roman Mursa, Croatia. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences , 11(1): 271–278. doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0545-yREED, K., SABLJIĆ, S., ŠOŠTARIĆ, R., and ESSERT, S., 2019. Grains from ear to ear: the morphology of spelt and free-threshing wheat from Roman Mursa (Osijek), Croatia. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. doi: 10.1007/s00334-019-00719-4.ROSENSTEIN, N., 2008. Aristocrats and Agriculture in the Middle and Late Republic. Journal of Roman Studies , 98, 1–26.SEETAH, K. 2004. Meat in History – The Butchery trade in the Romano-British period. food and History , 2(2), 19–33.SEETAH, K., 2012. Multidisciplinary approach to Romano-British cattle butchery. In: M. Maltby, ed. Integrating zooarchaeology . Proceedings of the 9 th Icaz Conference. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 109–116.ŠIMIĆ-KANAET, Z., TONČINIĆ, D., RADOVIĆ, S. 2005. Jama sj 55 iz Tilurija. Vjesnik za arheologiju i povijest dalmatinsku , 98, 107–120.SMITH, J.T., 1997 . roman Villas: A Study in Social Structure . London, New York: Routledge.ŠOŠTARIĆ, R., 2003. Vegetacijske promjene u postglacijalu u Hrvatskoj . Unpublished thesis (PhD), Sveučilište u Zagrebu.ŠOŠTARIĆ, R., and KÜSTER, H., 2001. Roman plant remains from Veli Brijun (island of Brioni), Croatia. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 10, 227–233.ŠOŠTARIĆ, R., DIZDAR, M., KUŠAN, D., HRŠAK, V., MAREKOVIĆ, S., 2006. Comparative Analysis of Plant Finds from Early Roman Graves in Ilok (Cuccium) and Šćitarjevo (Andautonia), Croatia – A Contribution to Understanding Burial Rites in Southern Pannonia. Collegium Antropologicum , 30, 429–436.ŠOŠTARIĆ, R., RADOVIĆ, S., JELINČIĆ VUČKOVIĆ, K., OŽANIĆ ROGULJIĆ, I., 2015. Diet at the Roman Village of Virovitica Kiškorija South, Croatia. Collegium Antropologicum , 39(4), 829–842SUIĆ, M., 2003. Antički grad na istočnom Jadranu . Zagreb.TARAS, D., 2015. Aegean coarse ware from the layers of the ancient port of Zaton. Diadora, 28, 191–218.THOMAS, E.B., 1980. Villa Settlements. In: A. Lengyel, and G.T.B. Radan, eds. the archaeology of roman Pannonia . Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, University Press of Kentucky, pp. 275–321.TORRENATO, N., 2001.The Auditorium site in Rome and the origins of the Villa. Journal of Roman Archaeology , 14, 5–32.VUKELIĆ, M., 2002. Pašarenje na Velebitu. Šumarski List , 126(5–6), 299–305.ZEDER, M.A., LAPHAM, H.A., 2010. Assessing the reliability of criteria used to identify postcranial bones in sheep, Ovis, and goats, Capra. Journal of Archaeological Science , 37, 2887–2905.
image/svg+xml